21 CFR Part 11 Compliance: Complete Guide to Electronic Records and Signatures
21 CFR Part 11 is the FDA regulation establishing that electronic records and electronic signatures are legally equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures when proper controls are in place. It applies to any FDA-regulated company that maintains electronic records required by FDA predicate rules (such as manufacturing records, clinical trial data, or regulatory submissions). Part 11 requires system validation, secure audit trails, access controls, and electronic signature certification. Organizations that fail to comply face FDA enforcement actions including warning letters, product delays, and application refusals.
21 CFR Part 11 is the FDA regulation that establishes criteria for accepting electronic records and electronic signatures as equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures. Enacted in 1997 and clarified through FDA guidance in 2003, Part 11 applies to any FDA-regulated company that creates, modifies, maintains, archives, retrieves, or transmits electronic records in any format.
Non-compliance with 21 CFR Part 11 can trigger FDA warning letters, 483 observations, product delays, and significant remediation costs. For pharmaceutical and biotech companies, Part 11 compliance is a foundational requirement for regulatory submissions, clinical trials, and manufacturing operations.
In this guide, you will learn:
- The complete structure and requirements of 21 CFR Part 11 (all three subparts)
- How to implement Part 11 compliance for electronic records and electronic signatures
- The difference between closed systems and open systems under Part 11
- Specific audit trail requirements and system validation approaches
- A comprehensive Part 11 compliance checklist for your organization
What Is 21 CFR Part 11?
21 CFR Part 11 is the federal regulation that establishes technical and procedural requirements for using electronic records and electronic signatures in FDA-regulated companies. It defines criteria under which electronic records and signatures are considered trustworthy, reliable, and legally equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures when organizations implement required controls including system validation, audit trails, access controls, and written policies.
21 CFR Part 11 is a federal regulation issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that defines the criteria under which electronic records and electronic signatures are considered trustworthy, reliable, and equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures. The regulation is codified in Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 11.
Key characteristics of 21 CFR Part 11:
- Applies to records required by FDA predicate rules (existing regulations)
- Covers both electronic records and electronic signatures
- Establishes technical and procedural controls for electronic systems
- Requires documented validation of computer systems
21 CFR Part 11 became effective on August 20, 1997, making it over 28 years old. The FDA issued clarifying guidance in 2003 (Scope and Application) that remains the primary interpretive document today.
The regulation consists of three subparts:
- Subpart A - General Provisions (scope, definitions, implementation)
- Subpart B - Electronic Records (controls, validation, audit trails)
- Subpart C - Electronic Signatures (uniqueness, controls, certification)
Part 11 History and Evolution
Understanding the history of 21 CFR Part 11 provides context for its current interpretation:
| Year | Event | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| 1991 | FDA begins developing electronic records policy | Response to industry computerization |
| 1997 | Part 11 final rule published | Effective August 20, 1997 |
| 1999 | Early FDA enforcement begins | Strict interpretation period |
| 2003 | FDA issues Scope and Application guidance | Risk-based enforcement approach |
| 2007 | FDA withdraws several Part 11 draft guidance documents | Reliance on 2003 Scope and Application guidance reinforced |
| 2018 | Data Integrity guidance published | Reinforces Part 11 principles |
| 2022 | FDA publishes Computer Software Assurance (CSA) final guidance | Modern risk-based validation framework |
Over 28 years since implementation, 21 CFR Part 11 remains the cornerstone of FDA electronic records policy, with Part 11 deficiencies consistently appearing in FDA 483 observations during inspections.
21 CFR Part 11 Compliance: Understanding the Scope
Before implementing Part 11 compliance, organizations must understand what falls within the regulation's scope. Not all electronic records require Part 11 controls.
When Part 11 Applies
Part 11 compliance is required when:
- Records are required by predicate rules - The underlying FDA regulation (21 CFR Parts 210, 211, 820, etc.) requires the record
- Electronic format is chosen - You elect to maintain records electronically instead of on paper
- Electronic signatures are used - You use electronic signatures instead of handwritten signatures
When Part 11 Does NOT Apply
According to FDA guidance on Part 11 scope and application:
- Records not required by predicate rules
- Paper records that are merely stored electronically (scanned images for archival)
- Electronic records created before August 20, 1997 (grandfather clause)
| Scenario | Part 11 Applies? | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Electronic batch records | Yes | Required by 21 CFR 211 |
| Electronic laboratory notebooks | Yes | Required by 21 CFR 58 (GLP) |
| Marketing emails | No | Not required by predicate rules |
| Scanned paper records (archival only) | No | Original was paper |
| Electronic signatures on submissions | Yes | Replacing handwritten signatures |
| eCTD submissions to FDA | Yes | Required by 21 CFR 314 and 601 |
| LIMS data in drug manufacturing | Yes | Required by 21 CFR 211.180 |
Create a system inventory that documents which records are subject to Part 11, whether they are electronic or paper, and whether you have implemented Part 11 controls. This inventory becomes your roadmap for compliance prioritization and serves as evidence during FDA inspections that you have thoughtfully assessed the regulation's applicability.
The FDA's 2003 guidance clarified Part 11's scope, reducing strict enforcement and introducing risk-based approaches. Organizations that have adopted risk-based validation strategies report significantly faster compliance timelines than those using rigid, box-checking approaches.
“Important: The FDA takes a risk-based approach to Part 11 enforcement. Focus compliance efforts on records that directly impact product quality and patient safety.
Electronic Records Electronic Signatures: Part 11 Subpart A
Subpart A of 21 CFR Part 11 establishes the general provisions, including scope, definitions, and implementation requirements for electronic records electronic signatures.
Key Definitions Under Part 11
| Term | Definition per 11.3 |
|---|---|
| Electronic record | Any combination of text, graphics, data, audio, pictorial, or other information representation in digital form that is created, modified, maintained, archived, retrieved, or distributed by a computer system |
| Electronic signature | A computer data compilation of any symbol or series of symbols executed, adopted, or authorized by an individual to be the legally binding equivalent of the individual's handwritten signature |
| Digital signature | An electronic signature based upon cryptographic methods of originator authentication |
| Closed system | An environment in which system access is controlled by persons responsible for the content of electronic records |
| Open system | An environment in which system access is not controlled by persons responsible for the content of electronic records |
| Biometric | A method of verifying an individual's identity based on measurement of the individual's physical feature(s) or repeatable action(s) where those features and/or actions are both unique to that individual and measurable |
Closed System vs Open System
The distinction between closed and open systems is critical for determining Part 11 requirements:
Closed System (11.10):
- Access controlled by the organization responsible for the records
- Examples: Internal LIMS, validated ERP systems, local document management systems
- Requires baseline Part 11 controls
Open System (11.30):
- Access NOT controlled by the organization responsible for the records
- Examples: Cloud-based systems where vendor controls access, internet-based submissions
- Requires additional controls: encryption, digital signatures, additional security measures
| Requirement | Closed System | Open System |
|---|---|---|
| Access controls | Required | Required + enhanced |
| Audit trails | Required | Required |
| Encryption | Recommended | Required |
| Digital signatures | Optional | Often required |
| Operational controls | Standard | Enhanced |
| Document encryption | Optional | Required per 11.30 |
Cloud Systems and Part 11 Classification
A common question is whether cloud-based systems are closed or open. The answer depends on control relationships:
| Cloud Scenario | Classification | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Private cloud (company-owned) | Closed | Organization controls all access |
| SaaS with contractual controls | Can be closed | If adequate agreements establish control |
| Public cloud with no agreements | Open | No contractual control over access |
| Hybrid arrangements | Evaluate case-by-case | Depends on specific controls |
“Best Practice: When using SaaS or cloud systems, establish written agreements that clearly define access controls, making the system functionally closed.
Part 11 Compliance Requirements: Subpart B Electronic Records
Subpart B (11.10 for closed systems, 11.30 for open systems) establishes the specific requirements for electronic records under FDA 21 CFR Part 11.
11.10 - Controls for Closed Systems
Organizations using closed systems must employ procedures and controls that include:
1. System Validation (11.10(a))
- Validation to ensure accuracy, reliability, consistent intended performance, and ability to discern invalid or altered records
- Documentation of validation activities
- Ongoing validation maintenance
2. Record Generation and Storage (11.10(b))
- Ability to generate accurate and complete copies of records in both human-readable and electronic form
- Protection of records throughout the retention period
3. Record Protection (11.10(c))
- Protection of records to enable accurate and ready retrieval
- Throughout the records retention period
4. System Access Controls (11.10(d))
- Limiting system access to authorized individuals
- Role-based access controls
- Documented access procedures
5. Audit Trails (11.10(e))
- Secure, computer-generated, time-stamped audit trails
- Record the date and time of operator entries and actions
- Must not obscure previously recorded information
- Audit trail documentation must be retained for at least as long as the subject electronic records
“Critical Requirement: Audit trails must be independently reviewed. FDA expects audit trail review to be part of your routine quality processes, not just during inspections.
6. Operational System Checks (11.10(f))
- Use of operational system checks to enforce permitted sequencing of steps and events
7. Authority Checks (11.10(g))
- Use of authority checks to ensure only authorized individuals can use the system, electronically sign, access the operation, or alter a record
8. Device Checks (11.10(h))
- Use of device checks to determine validity of source of data input or operational instruction
9. Training (11.10(i))
- Determination that persons who develop, maintain, or use electronic record/signature systems have the education, training, and experience to perform their assigned tasks
10. Written Policies (11.10(j))
- Establishment and adherence to written policies holding individuals accountable for actions initiated under their electronic signatures
11. System Documentation Controls (11.10(k))
- Adequate controls over systems documentation including distribution, access, and use
- Revision and change control procedures
11.10 Requirements Summary Table
| Section | Requirement | Key Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| 11.10(a) | Validation | Documented IQ/OQ/PQ, risk-based approach |
| 11.10(b) | Accurate copies | Export capability, format preservation |
| 11.10(c) | Record protection | Backup, disaster recovery, retention |
| 11.10(d) | Access controls | Unique IDs, role-based permissions |
| 11.10(e) | Audit trails | Secure, timestamped, reviewed |
| 11.10(f) | Operational checks | Workflow enforcement |
| 11.10(g) | Authority checks | Permission verification |
| 11.10(h) | Device checks | Input validation |
| 11.10(i) | Training | Documented competency |
| 11.10(j) | Written policies | Accountability procedures |
| 11.10(k) | Documentation | Change control, access control |
11.30 - Controls for Open Systems
Open systems require all the controls listed in 11.10 PLUS additional measures:
- Document encryption
- Use of appropriate digital signature standards
- Additional operational controls to ensure record authenticity, integrity, and confidentiality
FDA 21 CFR Part 11: Subpart C Electronic Signatures
Subpart C establishes requirements for electronic signatures that are intended to be the legally binding equivalent of handwritten signatures.
11.50 - Signature Manifestations
Each electronic signature must include:
- Printed name of the signer
- Date and time the signature was executed
- Meaning of the signature (e.g., review, approval, responsibility, authorship)
This information must be displayed clearly and must be part of any human-readable form of the electronic record.
11.70 - Signature/Record Linking
Electronic signatures must be linked to their respective electronic records to ensure signatures cannot be:
- Excised (cut out)
- Copied
- Transferred to falsify an electronic record by ordinary means
11.100 - General Requirements
| Requirement | Description |
|---|---|
| Uniqueness | Each electronic signature must be unique to one individual and not reused or reassigned |
| Identity verification | Organization must verify identity of individual before assigning their electronic signature |
| Certification | Organization must certify to FDA that electronic signatures are intended to be legally binding equivalents |
11.200 - Electronic Signature Components and Controls
Electronic signatures not based on biometrics must employ at least two distinct identification components:
For signatures executed during a single continuous session:
- Both components (user ID + password) required at first signing
- At least one component required for subsequent signings during session
For signatures executed during non-continuous sessions:
- Both components required for EACH signing event
Signature Component Requirements
| Scenario | User ID Required | Password Required |
|---|---|---|
| First signing in session | Yes | Yes |
| Subsequent signing (same session) | At least one component | At least one component |
| New session signing | Yes | Yes |
| Biometric signature | Not applicable | Not applicable |
11.300 - Controls for Identification Codes/Passwords
| Control | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Uniqueness | Codes must be unique to individual users |
| Periodic revision | Codes must be periodically checked, recalled, or revised |
| Loss management | Procedures to deauthorize lost, stolen, or compromised tokens/codes |
| Transaction safeguards | Prevent unauthorized use and detect attempts at unauthorized use |
| Testing | Initial and periodic testing of devices that bear or generate codes |
CFR Part 11 Requirements: Audit Trail Deep Dive
The audit trail is one of the most scrutinized aspects of Part 11 compliance during FDA inspections. Understanding audit trail requirements is essential for Part 11 compliance.
What Must Be Captured in Audit Trails
Per 11.10(e), audit trails must capture:
- Date and time of entries and actions (computer-generated, time-stamped)
- Operator identification (who made the change)
- Previous values (what was there before the change)
- New values (what it was changed to)
- Reason for change (when required by predicate rules)
Audit Trail Technical Requirements
| Requirement | Implementation |
|---|---|
| Computer-generated | System creates entries automatically, not manually |
| Time-stamped | Uses synchronized, reliable time source |
| Secure | Cannot be modified or deleted by ordinary means |
| Independent | Stored separately or protected from modification |
| Complete | Captures all changes to subject electronic records |
| Retained | Kept for at least as long as subject records |
Common Audit Trail Failures
FDA commonly cites these audit trail deficiencies in 483 observations:
- Insufficient detail - Not capturing what specific data changed
- Missing timestamps - Entries without date/time stamps
- Modifiable trails - Users can delete or alter audit trail entries
- No review process - Audit trails exist but are never reviewed
- Retention gaps - Audit trails not retained as long as records
- Inconsistent coverage - Some fields audited, others not
- Time synchronization issues - Multiple systems with different timestamps
Audit trail deficiencies are among the most commonly cited FDA 483 observations related to data integrity and Part 11 compliance. Organizations with documented, routine audit trail review processes are significantly less likely to receive audit trail citations.
Establish a monthly audit trail review schedule for each Part 11 system. Document which fields require detailed review (e.g., batch record temperature data vs. administrative fields), who conducts the review, and what constitutes a reportable discrepancy. This proactive approach prevents audit trail problems from festering until FDA inspection, and demonstrates your organization's commitment to data integrity.
“Best Practice: Implement routine audit trail review as part of your quality system. FDA expects organizations to proactively review audit trails, not just generate them.
Audit Trail Review Frequency
| Record Type | Recommended Review Frequency |
|---|---|
| Batch records | Each batch release |
| Laboratory data | Before data approval |
| Stability data | Before trend reporting |
| Complaints | As part of investigation |
| CAPA records | At CAPA closure |
| Deviation records | At deviation closure |
Computer System Validation for Part 11 Compliance
System validation is the cornerstone of Part 11 compliance. Without documented validation, electronic records cannot be considered trustworthy and reliable.
Validation Requirements Under 11.10(a)
The regulation requires validation to ensure:
- Accuracy - System produces correct results
- Reliability - System performs consistently over time
- Consistent intended performance - System does what it is designed to do
- Ability to discern invalid or altered records - System can detect tampering
Risk-Based Validation Approach
FDA guidance supports a risk-based approach to validation:
| System Risk Level | Validation Extent | Example Systems |
|---|---|---|
| High | Full validation (IQ, OQ, PQ) | LIMS, MES, eCTD publishing, clinical data systems |
| Medium | Focused validation | Document management systems, training databases |
| Low | Configuration verification | Standard office software, email (when Part 11 applicable) |
GAMP 5 Categories and Validation
The GAMP 5 framework provides industry-standard guidance for computer system validation:
| GAMP Category | Description | Validation Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Category 1 | Infrastructure software | Qualification within higher category systems |
| Category 3 | Non-configured products | Installation and operational testing |
| Category 4 | Configured products | Configuration testing plus functional testing |
| Category 5 | Custom applications | Full lifecycle validation |
Validation Documentation Requirements
| Document | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Validation Plan | Defines scope, approach, responsibilities |
| User Requirements Specification (URS) | Documents what system must do |
| Functional Specification | Documents how system will meet requirements |
| Design Specification | Documents technical design |
| Installation Qualification (IQ) | Verifies correct installation |
| Operational Qualification (OQ) | Verifies system operates as designed |
| Performance Qualification (PQ) | Verifies system performs in production environment |
| Validation Summary Report | Documents validation conclusion |
| Traceability Matrix | Links requirements to test cases |
Ongoing Validation Maintenance
Validation is not a one-time event. Part 11 requires:
- Change control - All changes assessed for validation impact
- Periodic review - Regular assessment of system compliance
- Revalidation - When significant changes occur
- Incident management - Tracking and resolving system issues
Systems with documented change control procedures experience significantly fewer validation gaps during FDA inspections compared to organizations without formal change control. The investment in change control documentation pays substantial compliance dividends.
For legacy systems where full retrospective validation may be prohibitively expensive, conduct a risk-based current-state assessment documenting what Part 11 controls are in place and what gaps exist. Then implement compensating procedural controls for identified gaps (e.g., manual audit trail review, manual access control verification) while planning for system replacement. This pragmatic approach is FDA-acceptable and more cost-effective than abandoning the system immediately.
Part 11 Compliance Checklist
Use this comprehensive checklist to assess your organization's 21 CFR Part 11 compliance status:
Administrative Controls Checklist
| Requirement | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Written Part 11 compliance policy | [ ] | Policy document number |
| Electronic signature certification on file | [ ] | Certification letter to FDA |
| Roles and responsibilities defined | [ ] | SOPs, job descriptions |
| Training program implemented | [ ] | Training records |
| Periodic compliance assessments | [ ] | Assessment reports |
| Data integrity policy in place | [ ] | Policy document |
System Controls Checklist
| Requirement | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Systems inventoried and categorized | [ ] | System inventory list |
| Validation documentation complete | [ ] | Validation packages |
| User access controls implemented | [ ] | Access control procedures |
| Unique user IDs assigned | [ ] | User account records |
| Password policies enforced | [ ] | System configuration |
| Audit trails enabled and configured | [ ] | System settings, audit trail samples |
| Audit trail review process defined | [ ] | Review SOPs, review records |
| System change control implemented | [ ] | Change control procedures |
| Backup and recovery procedures | [ ] | Backup logs, recovery tests |
| System security measures | [ ] | Security assessment |
| Time synchronization verified | [ ] | NTP configuration records |
Electronic Signature Controls Checklist
| Requirement | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Two-component signatures implemented | [ ] | System configuration |
| Signature manifestations displayed | [ ] | System screenshots |
| Signature/record linking enforced | [ ] | System design documentation |
| Identity verification before assignment | [ ] | Verification procedures |
| Lost/compromised credential procedures | [ ] | Deauthorization SOP |
| Signature meaning captured | [ ] | System configuration |
Record Controls Checklist
| Requirement | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Records retention policy defined | [ ] | Retention schedule |
| Records accessible throughout retention | [ ] | Access verification |
| Records can be rendered human-readable | [ ] | Export capability |
| Records protected from alteration | [ ] | Access controls, audit trails |
| Record copies accurate and complete | [ ] | Copy verification |
| Migration procedures documented | [ ] | Migration protocols |
Common Part 11 Compliance Gaps and Solutions
Gap 1: Inadequate Audit Trails
Problem: Systems generate basic audit trails but do not capture sufficient detail or are modifiable.
Solution:
- Configure systems to capture before/after values
- Enable reason-for-change fields where required
- Ensure audit trails are stored in write-once format
- Implement regular audit trail review
When evaluating your current audit trail capabilities, prioritize critical data fields (batch temperatures, concentrations, test results) for detailed audit trail coverage before attempting comprehensive system-wide audit trails. This tiered approach accelerates compliance while focusing limited resources on the fields that matter most to product quality.
Gap 2: Shared User Accounts
Problem: Multiple users share login credentials, making accountability impossible.
Solution:
- Assign unique user IDs to every individual
- Implement role-based access controls
- Disable generic and shared accounts
- Document in policy that account sharing is prohibited
Gap 3: Missing Validation Documentation
Problem: Systems are in use but lack documented validation.
Solution:
- Conduct retrospective validation where possible
- Implement risk-based prioritization
- Document current-state assessment
- Create remediation plan with timelines
Gap 4: No Electronic Signature Certification
Problem: Organization uses electronic signatures but has not certified to FDA.
Solution:
- Submit certification letter to appropriate FDA center
- Maintain copy of certification in quality records
- Update certification as needed for new product types
Gap 5: Inadequate Training Documentation
Problem: Personnel use systems but training records are incomplete or missing.
Solution:
- Create training matrix for all Part 11 systems
- Document initial and ongoing training
- Include Part 11 awareness in training curriculum
- Maintain training records per retention requirements
Gap 6: Legacy System Non-Compliance
Problem: Older systems lack Part 11 controls and cannot be easily upgraded.
Solution:
- Conduct risk assessment of legacy systems
- Implement compensating procedural controls
- Plan for system replacement or upgrade
- Document gap analysis and remediation timeline
Part 11 and Other FDA Regulations
21 CFR Part 11 does not exist in isolation. It works in conjunction with predicate rules:
| Predicate Rule | Application | Part 11 Interaction |
|---|---|---|
| 21 CFR 211 | Drug cGMP | Batch records, laboratory records |
| 21 CFR 820 | Device QSR | Design history file, device master record |
| 21 CFR 58 | GLP | Study data, laboratory notebooks |
| 21 CFR 312 | IND | Clinical trial records, submissions |
| 21 CFR 314 | NDA | Submission records, correspondence |
| 21 CFR 601 | BLA | Biologics submission records |
| ICH E6(R2) | GCP | Clinical trial data, electronic source |
“Key Point: Part 11 requirements apply ON TOP OF predicate rule requirements. You must comply with both the underlying regulation AND Part 11 when using electronic records.
Part 11 and Data Integrity
The FDA's 2018 Data Integrity guidance reinforces Part 11 principles. ALCOA+ criteria align with Part 11 requirements:
| ALCOA+ Principle | Part 11 Alignment |
|---|---|
| Attributable | User identification, electronic signatures |
| Legible | Human-readable copies, record protection |
| Contemporaneous | Timestamping, audit trails |
| Original | Record protection, audit trails |
| Accurate | System validation, device checks |
| Complete | Audit trails, record protection |
| Consistent | Validation, operational checks |
| Enduring | Retention, record protection |
| Available | Accessibility throughout retention |
Key Takeaways
21 CFR Part 11 is the FDA regulation that establishes requirements for electronic records and electronic signatures in FDA-regulated industries. It defines the criteria under which electronic records and signatures are considered trustworthy, reliable, and equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures. The regulation became effective on August 20, 1997.
Key Takeaways
- 21 CFR Part 11 establishes FDA requirements: The regulation defines how electronic records and electronic signatures can be equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures in FDA-regulated industries.
- Scope determination is critical: Part 11 applies only to records required by predicate rules where electronic format is chosen. Not all electronic records require Part 11 controls.
- Audit trails are non-negotiable: Secure, computer-generated, time-stamped audit trails that record operator entries and do not obscure previous information are a core requirement under 11.10(e).
- Validation establishes trustworthiness: Without documented computer system validation per 11.10(a), electronic records cannot be considered reliable.
- Electronic signatures require certification: Organizations must certify to FDA that electronic signatures are the legally binding equivalent of handwritten signatures.
- Take action now: Assess your current systems against Part 11 requirements, prioritize gaps by risk, and implement a remediation plan.
- ---
Next Steps
Understanding 21 CFR Part 11 requirements is the first step toward compliance. Implementing those requirements across your electronic systems, including eCTD publishing, LIMS, and clinical trial databases, requires systematic assessment and remediation.
Organizations managing regulatory submissions benefit from automated validation tools that catch errors before gateway rejection. Assyro's AI-powered platform validates eCTD submissions against FDA, EMA, and Health Canada requirements, providing detailed error reports and remediation guidance before submission.
Sources
Sources
- 21 CFR Part 11 - Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures
- FDA Guidance for Industry: Part 11, Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures - Scope and Application (2003)
- FDA Data Integrity and Compliance With Drug CGMP Guidance (2018)
- 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Finished Pharmaceuticals
- ISPE GAMP 5: A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerized Systems
