Lack of Substantial Evidence for Effectiveness in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Severity: criticalThe application failed to provide substantial evidence for the effectiveness of gepirone ER in the short-term or longer-term treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Only two out of twelve studies showed a significant effect, while the remaining ten studies did not show evidence of an antidepressant effect or even favorable trends. Three trials showed active comparators were statistically superior to gepirone ER, and in two trials, active comparators were superior to placebo while gepirone ER was not. A meta-analysis of the ten failed studies showed an effect size of essentially zero. The negative outcome of the longer-term maintenance efficacy trial (study 28709) further casts doubt on the drug's effectiveness, and the post hoc attempt to repair the study by eliminating patients was deemed not credible or valid. The agency expressed low optimism for a path forward for this drug as an antidepressant.
Recommended response: Conduct additional well-designed, adequately powered clinical trials to demonstrate substantial evidence of effectiveness for gepirone ER in MDD, addressing the issues of effect size, comparison to active controls, and consistency across studies. Re-evaluate meta-analysis methodology and consider dose-ranging studies if an inadequate dose is suspected. A new clinical development program may be necessary.
Cited: 21 CFR 314.125(b), section 505(d) of the Act
