Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other (Nov 13, 2025)

Issued November 13, 2025

Issued

November 13, 2025

Application

Other

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Product may be marketed.

Summary

This is a Complete Response letter from the FDA to Cyclomedica Australia Pty Ltd. regarding their New Drug Application (NDA) for Technegas™ Technetium Tc-99m carbon aerosol. The FDA has determined that the application cannot be approved in its present form due to various deficiencies across product quality (drug substance, drug product, process, device) and clinical aspects, and provides recommendations for addressing these issues.

Key points

  • Develop a quality program to characterize and control the Technegas aerosol drug product, including validating the production method, measuring particle size distribution, radioactivity, and yield, proposing and describing suitable analytical methods with validation, establishing specifications and justifying acceptance criteria, and submitting results from at least three production runs.
  • Provide aerosol batch data from validated analytical methods for at least three registration batches to support commercial aerosol drug production and in-process controls at minimum and maximum crucible load of sodium pertechnetate radioactivity, ensuring batches meet specifications and are produced according to the proposed regulatory commercial production process using approved sodium pertechnetate injection solutions.
  • Revise the regulatory production description to include volume and strength of sodium pertechnetate injection solution loaded, percent yield based on batch data, and remove specific statements as advised.
  • Develop validated analytical methods suitable to characterize the aerosol drug particle size distribution, radioactivity, and aerosol yield, submitting analytical method descriptions and validations for each.
  • Partner with radiopharmaceutical drug development experts to develop and validate new methods and submit necessary documentation.
  • Develop a quality program to characterize and control the crucible, revise crucible specifications, submit crucible release and stability data that meet specifications, and submit a stability protocol for the crucible.
  • Establish and monitor a minimum of environmental controls within the crucible manufacturing suite prior to packaging to meet 21 CFR Part 211.46 requirements.
  • Address gaps in raw data generation, storage, and documentation of regulated data for crucible manufacturing.

Cited reasons

  • Characterization and control of the aerosol drug
  • Validation of the aerosol drug production and documentation
  • Analytical methods to characterize the aerosol particle size distribution, radioactivity and the aerosol yield
  • Control of a Critical Component of the Radioactive Drug Substance (Crucible)
  • Environmental Controls
  • Inadequate manufacturing control strategy for Crucible
  • Shipping
  • Production

Recommended actions

  • Develop a quality program to characterize and control the Technegas aerosol drug product, including validating the production method, measuring particle size distribution, radioactivity, and yield, proposing and describing suitable analytical methods with validation, establishing specifications and justifying acceptance criteria, and submitting results from at least three production runs.
  • Provide aerosol batch data from validated analytical methods for at least three registration batches to support commercial aerosol drug production and in-process controls at minimum and maximum crucible load of sodium pertechnetate radioactivity, ensuring batches meet specifications and are produced according to the proposed regulatory commercial production process using approved sodium pertechnetate injection solutions.
  • Revise the regulatory production description to include volume and strength of sodium pertechnetate injection solution loaded, percent yield based on batch data, and remove specific statements as advised.
  • Develop validated analytical methods suitable to characterize the aerosol drug particle size distribution, radioactivity, and aerosol yield, submitting analytical method descriptions and validations for each.
  • Partner with radiopharmaceutical drug development experts to develop and validate new methods and submit necessary documentation.
  • Develop a quality program to characterize and control the crucible, revise crucible specifications, submit crucible release and stability data that meet specifications, and submit a stability protocol for the crucible.
  • Establish and monitor a minimum of environmental controls within the crucible manufacturing suite prior to packaging to meet 21 CFR Part 211.46 requirements.
  • Address gaps in raw data generation, storage, and documentation of regulated data for crucible manufacturing.

Deficiency summary

The application lacks adequate characterization and control of the Technegas aerosol drug product and its critical components (crucible), insufficient validation of manufacturing processes, inadequate environmental controls, and issues with shipping studies. Clinical deficiencies include risks of dyspnea and hypoxia, and justification for recommended loading ranges in adult and pediatric patients.

Findings

Characterization and control of the aerosol drug

Severity: major

The NDA has not provided adequate characterization of the aerosol, including aerosol composition, batch formula, batch data, stability data, identity, strength, purity, delivered dose, generator yield, generator duty cycle and generator recertification period. Critical quality attributes and specifications have not been established to ensure identity, strength, quality, purity, or potency.

Recommended response: Develop a comprehensive quality program to characterize and control the Technegas aerosol drug product. Validate aerosol production methods, propose and describe suitable analytical methods with validation, and establish justified specifications for critical product quality attributes. Submit results from at least three production runs at minimum and maximum radioactivity loads.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d) (ii)((a))

Validation of the aerosol drug production and documentation

Severity: major

Aerosol batch data from validated analytical methods for at least three registration batches are required to support commercial aerosol drug production and in-process controls. Batches must meet specifications and be produced according to the proposed regulatory commercial production process using sodium pertechnetate injection solution from approved manufacturers.

Recommended response: Provide aerosol batch data from validated analytical methods for at least three registration batches, ensuring they meet specifications and are produced under commercial conditions using sodium pertechnetate from approved US manufacturers. Revise the regulatory production description as previously advised.

Analytical methods to characterize the aerosol particle size distribution, radioactivity and the aerosol yield

Severity: major

Validated analytical methods suitable for characterizing the aerosol drug particle size distribution, radioactivity, and aerosol yield need to be developed. Standard methods may not be suitable due to short expiry and radioactivity.

Recommended response: Develop and validate new analytical methods for aerosol characterization, potentially collaborating with radiopharmaceutical drug development experts. Submit detailed method descriptions and validation data for each method.

Control of a Critical Component of the Radioactive Drug Substance (Crucible)

Severity: major

Inadequate specifications for the crucible (on release or stability) have been provided. Batch data, stability data, and a post-approval stability protocol for the crucibles are missing.

Recommended response: Develop a quality program to characterize and control the crucible. Revise crucible specifications, submit release and stability data that meet specifications, and provide a stability protocol for the crucible.

Environmental Controls

Severity: major

The current environmental controls within the crucible manufacturing suite are inadequate to assure crucible product quality.

Recommended response: Establish and monitor minimum environmental controls in the crucible manufacturing suite prior to packaging to meet the requirements of 21 CFR Part 211.46.

Cited: 21 CFR Part 211.46

Inadequate manufacturing control strategy for Crucible

Severity: major

The NDA has not established adequate controls at each stage of the crucible manufacturing process related to validated operating parameters, in-process controls to support critical quality attributes. Gaps exist in raw data generation, storage, and documentation.

Recommended response: Implement a robust manufacturing control strategy for the crucible, addressing validated operating parameters, in-process controls, raw data generation, storage, and documentation.

Shipping

Severity: major

Adverse test observations noted for the crucible shipping studies have not been addressed. Corrective actions or proposed design changes for primary or secondary packaging are lacking.

Recommended response: Provide updated test reports, address all adverse test observations, detail corrective actions, and propose any necessary packaging design changes for primary and secondary packaging. Any packaging change will require a new shipping study.

Production

Severity: major

Failure to demonstrate consistent and reliable production of the Tc-99m carbon aerosol under good manufacturing conditions and documented registration batches to comply with actual yield and % of theoretical yield requirements. Issues also exist regarding 21 CFR Part 4 and 21 CFR Part 820 if adopting a streamlined approach.

Recommended response: Demonstrate consistent and reliable production of the Tc-99m carbon aerosol under good manufacturing conditions, ensuring compliance with yield requirements and relevant regulations (21 CFR Part 211.103, 21 CFR Part 4, 21 CFR Part 820).

Cited: 21 CFR Part 211.103, 21 CFR Part 4, 21 CFR Part 820

Reliability Assessment

Severity: major

The reliability assessment report for the TechnegasTM system is unacceptable as it is not based on an approved protocol/verification test but exclusively on customer complaints data.

Recommended response: Submit a proper verification protocol, analytical tests/methods, specifications, acceptance criteria, and a final report for the reliability assessment of the TechnegasTM system.

Yield

Severity: major

Proposed procedures for annual recertification do not address ongoing yield monitoring of the final drug product by the TechnegasTM system as approved in drug specification.

Recommended response: Revise the proposed procedures to include ongoing yield monitoring of the final drug product by the TechnegasTM system, aligning with approved drug specifications.

Exposure Dose

Severity: major

Details on the calculations performed in determining exposure doses and threshold values used in calculating margin of safety values for all detected chemicals are missing.

Recommended response: Provide detailed, tabulated information on exposure dose calculations, including justification for selected values, exposure metrics, conversion factors, toxicity thresholds, and uncertainty factors.

Risk of Dyspnea and Hypoxia

Severity: critical

Raw data from the CYC-009 study indicate a high rate of operator intervention for dyspnea/hypoxia. The NDA lacks a clear upper time limit for Technegas administration, instructions for operators on providing room air/supplemental oxygen, and breathing instructions for optimal risk mitigation.

Recommended response: Provide a detailed analysis of patient breathing methods from the CYC-009 study, clarifying relationships to other investigations and discussing advantages/disadvantages for biodistribution and risk mitigation. Add the missing information to instructions for prescribers and device operators, and re-prioritize patient breathing instructions based on this analysis.

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
505(b)(2) NDA

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
228 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The application has significant deficiencies across product quality (CMC, manufacturing, controls, analytical methods, critical components, shipping), device reliability, and clinical aspects (patient safety, dosing justification), indicating a lack of comprehensive characterization, validation, and risk mitigation strategies for this complex radiopharmaceutical product.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…