Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other (Nov 13, 2025)

Issued November 13, 2025

Issued

November 13, 2025

Application

Other

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due November 13, 2026Product may be marketed.

Summary

The FDA issued a Complete Response letter for NDA 022561 for cladribine tablets, indicating that the application cannot be approved in its current form. While cladribine was found effective for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), significant safety concerns, particularly an increased risk of malignancy and lymphopenia, outweigh its benefits. The letter details specific deficiencies in clinical safety data, product quality, and labeling, requiring the applicant to provide additional analyses, studies, and information before resubmission.

Key points

  • Provide an improved understanding of the malignancy risk through additional analyses or by conducting additional studies.
  • Provide additional information on the methods used in calculating the standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) described in the Integrated Summary of Safety.
  • Clarify whether risk factors for malignancy were documented in all study subjects and whether an imbalance in pre-existing risk factors has been documented in cladribine-treated subjects as compared to placebo-treated subjects.
  • Provide additional information on the PREMIERE long-term prospective follow-up safety registry, including information to be collected and planned methods for analysis, specifically how expected rates of adverse events will be determined.
  • Ascertain the time to resolution of lymphopenia in cladribine-treated subjects in the CLARITY study.
  • Clarify and justify the intended maximum dosing duration of cladribine in clinical use.
  • Submit analyses of malignancy risk and changes in hematologic laboratory measurements for the subgroup of patients with a history of taking disease-modifying drugs for multiple sclerosis.
  • Submit analyses of malignancy risk stratified by age, especially for subjects over age 40.

Cited reasons

  • Unacceptable Increased Risk of Malignancy
  • Insufficient Understanding of Lymphopenia Resolution
  • Vague Long-term Dosing Plans
  • Need for Additional Safety Analyses for Specific Subgroups
  • Insufficient Information on Additive Lymphocyte Effects with Concomitant Medications
  • Unacceptable Dissolution Specification
  • Carton and Container Labeling Revisions Required
  • The application for cladribine Tablets cannot be approved in its present form due to significant safety concerns, primarily an unacceptable increased risk of malignancy associated with its use, which outweighs its demonstrated effectiveness for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Additional deficiencies include insufficient understanding of lymphopenia resolution, vague long-term dosing plans, the need for further safety analyses in specific subgroups, inadequate information on potential drug-drug interactions affecting lymphocytes, an unacceptable dissolution specification, and required revisions to carton and container labeling.

Recommended actions

  • Provide an improved understanding of the malignancy risk through additional analyses or by conducting additional studies.
  • Provide additional information on the methods used in calculating the standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) described in the Integrated Summary of Safety.
  • Clarify whether risk factors for malignancy were documented in all study subjects and whether an imbalance in pre-existing risk factors has been documented in cladribine-treated subjects as compared to placebo-treated subjects.
  • Provide additional information on the PREMIERE long-term prospective follow-up safety registry, including information to be collected and planned methods for analysis, specifically how expected rates of adverse events will be determined.
  • Ascertain the time to resolution of lymphopenia in cladribine-treated subjects in the CLARITY study.
  • Clarify and justify the intended maximum dosing duration of cladribine in clinical use.
  • Submit analyses of malignancy risk and changes in hematologic laboratory measurements for the subgroup of patients with a history of taking disease-modifying drugs for multiple sclerosis.
  • Submit analyses of malignancy risk stratified by age, especially for subjects over age 40.

Deficiency summary

The application for cladribine Tablets cannot be approved in its present form due to significant safety concerns, primarily an unacceptable increased risk of malignancy associated with its use, which outweighs its demonstrated effectiveness for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Additional deficiencies include insufficient understanding of lymphopenia resolution, vague long-term dosing plans, the need for further safety analyses in specific subgroups, inadequate information on potential drug-drug interactions affecting lymphocytes, an unacceptable dissolution specification, and required revisions to carton and container labeling.

Findings

Unacceptable Increased Risk of Malignancy

Severity: critical

The presence of a disproportionate number of malignancies in cladribine-treated subjects represents an unacceptable risk. The agency found the sponsor's arguments to address this concern unconvincing, including comparisons to general population rates, exclusion of certain cancer types, pre-existing risk factors, long-term data bias, and the proposed PREMIERE registry.

Recommended response: Provide an improved understanding of the malignancy risk through additional analyses or by conducting additional studies. Address specific arguments made regarding malignancy rates, risk factors, and the PREMIERE registry.

Cited: section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

Insufficient Understanding of Lymphopenia Resolution

Severity: major

Cladribine causes a prompt and sustained decrease in absolute lymphocyte count. A clear understanding of the time to resolution of lymphopenia is essential for assessing the safety profile and providing appropriate guidance on hematologic monitoring.

Recommended response: Ascertain the time to resolution of lymphopenia in cladribine-treated subjects in the CLARITY study to inform approvability and guide hematologic monitoring duration.

Vague Long-term Dosing Plans

Severity: major

The submission and proposed labeling lack specific discussion on how dosing should be approached after the initial cycles of treatment.

Recommended response: Clarify and justify the intended maximum dosing duration of cladribine in clinical use.

Need for Additional Safety Analyses for Specific Subgroups

Severity: major

Additional safety issues require further information, including analyses of malignancy risk and changes in hematologic laboratory measurements for patients with a history of taking disease-modifying drugs for multiple sclerosis, and malignancy risk stratified by age (especially for subjects over age 40).

Recommended response: Conduct and submit the requested subgroup analyses for malignancy risk and hematologic changes.

Insufficient Information on Additive Lymphocyte Effects with Concomitant Medications

Severity: major

If cladribine is taken with other agents that affect lymphocytes, additive adverse effects leading to lymphopenia may occur. Insufficient information is provided to guide on cladribine's use in such scenarios.

Recommended response: Provide additional information, including specific medications that may lead to additive effects on lymphocytes, to guide cladribine's use.

Unacceptable Dissolution Specification

Severity: major

The proposed dissolution specification is not acceptable as cladribine dissolution is very rapid, with more than [redacted]% dissolution within 15 minutes.

Recommended response: Tighten the dissolution specification to NLT [redacted]% of labeled amount of cladribine dissolved in 15 minutes (Q).

Carton and Container Labeling Revisions Required

Severity: minor

Specific comments on carton and container labeling require revision. Full labeling comments are reserved until the application is otherwise adequate.

Recommended response: Submit draft carton and container labeling revised according to the specific comments provided, including updated content of labeling in Structured Product Labeling (SPL) format.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
NDA 505(b)

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
730 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The primary theme is the unacceptable safety risk of malignancy associated with cladribine, which outweighs its demonstrated effectiveness for RRMS, necessitating further extensive safety characterization and risk mitigation strategies before approval can be considered. Secondary themes include insufficient data on lymphopenia management, unclear long-term dosing, and minor product quality and labeling issues.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…