Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 202860 (Jan 1, 2019)

Issued January 1, 2019

Issued

January 1, 2019

Application

Other • 202860

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due January 1, 2020Product may be marketed.

Summary

This is a Complete Response letter from the FDA to Vero Biotech, LLC, for their New Drug Application (NDA) 202860 for GeNOsyl® Delivery System (Nitric Oxide). The FDA has determined that the application cannot be approved in its present form due to deficiencies identified during facility inspections, issues related to the device's design and testing (CDRH concerns), and inadequacies in the human factors validation study.

Key points

  • Satisfactorily resolve deficiencies identified during the inspection of the Vero Biotech manufacturing facility (FEI: 3014617112).
  • Provide evidence of conformity to specified clauses of the relevant standard for the device's sensory feedback and controlled outputs, or provide itemized responses with rationale for non-applicability.
  • Provide performance testing to demonstrate that transient specifications are met and the control system remains stable under various disturbances or variabilities, either analytically or experimentally.
  • Provide testing of the physical device to demonstrate delivery shutdown at NO2 levels exceeding 3 ppm.
  • Provide information to assess the safety of the GeNOsyl® Delivery System in electromagnetic environments, including evidence of electrostatic discharge (ESD) immunity.
  • Test the GeNOsyl® Delivery System for immunity to RFID readers according to FDA-recognized AIM standard 7351731 or an equivalent ad hoc testing method, and include specific risks and test results in the Operator's Manual.
  • Provide information on the device's surface temperature in the event of a battery short circuit, conducted when the battery supplies maximum current.
  • Provide information demonstrating that battery manufacturer safety requirements (e.g., environment, electrical, load, venting, air flow, charging speed) are met after the battery is integrated into the system.

Cited reasons

  • Unresolved Manufacturing Facility Deficiencies
  • Insufficient Device Performance and Stability Data
  • Inadequate Physical Device Delivery Shutdown Testing
  • Insufficient Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) and RFID Immunity Testing
  • Inadequate Battery Safety Information
  • Inadequate Evaluation of Critical Alarms in Human Factors Study
  • Confounding Variables in Human Factors Study
  • Unmitigated Use Errors and Difficulties in Human Factors Study

Recommended actions

  • Satisfactorily resolve deficiencies identified during the inspection of the Vero Biotech manufacturing facility (FEI: 3014617112).
  • Provide evidence of conformity to specified clauses of the relevant standard for the device's sensory feedback and controlled outputs, or provide itemized responses with rationale for non-applicability.
  • Provide performance testing to demonstrate that transient specifications are met and the control system remains stable under various disturbances or variabilities, either analytically or experimentally.
  • Provide testing of the physical device to demonstrate delivery shutdown at NO2 levels exceeding 3 ppm.
  • Provide information to assess the safety of the GeNOsyl® Delivery System in electromagnetic environments, including evidence of electrostatic discharge (ESD) immunity.
  • Test the GeNOsyl® Delivery System for immunity to RFID readers according to FDA-recognized AIM standard 7351731 or an equivalent ad hoc testing method, and include specific risks and test results in the Operator's Manual.
  • Provide information on the device's surface temperature in the event of a battery short circuit, conducted when the battery supplies maximum current.
  • Provide information demonstrating that battery manufacturer safety requirements (e.g., environment, electrical, load, venting, air flow, charging speed) are met after the battery is integrated into the system.

Deficiency summary

The application cannot be approved due to unresolved manufacturing facility deficiencies, significant issues with the device's safety and performance testing (including stability, delivery shutdown, electromagnetic compatibility, and battery safety), and inadequate human factors validation study results, particularly regarding critical alarm detection and response, and unvalidated user interface modifications.

Findings

Unresolved Manufacturing Facility Deficiencies

Severity: critical

During a recent inspection of the Vero Biotech manufacturing facility (FEI: 3014617112), field investigators conveyed deficiencies that require satisfactory resolution before the NDA can be considered for approval.

Recommended response: Address all deficiencies identified during the facility inspection and provide evidence of satisfactory resolution to the agency.

Insufficient Device Performance and Stability Data

Severity: major

The device incorporates sensory feedback and closed-loop technology. FDA believes conformance to certain clauses of a standard will provide evidence of safety and adequate performance. Specifically, evidence of conformity to certain clauses/sub-clauses, performance testing to demonstrate transient specifications are met, and control system stability (analytically or experimentally) are required. The current submission's performance testing summary stating analysis is not applicable is insufficient.

Recommended response: Conduct and submit performance testing demonstrating transient specifications and control system stability, providing either analytical or experimental evidence. Justify any non-applicability with robust rationale.

Inadequate Physical Device Delivery Shutdown Testing

Severity: major

The device appears to be tested by software only to demonstrate delivery shutdown at NO2 levels exceeding 3 ppm. Physical device testing is required to demonstrate delivery shutdown.

Recommended response: Perform and submit physical device testing to demonstrate delivery shutdown capabilities.

Insufficient Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) and RFID Immunity Testing

Severity: major

Information is needed to assess the safety of the GeNOsyl in electromagnetic environments. The device needs to be tested for immunity to RFID readers according to FDA-recognized AIM standard 'Medical Electrical Equipment and System Electromagnetic Immunity Test for Exposure to Radio Frequency Identification Readers' (AIM catalog number 7351731) or an equivalent ad hoc testing. Operator's Manual should include risks and test results.

Recommended response: Conduct EMC testing for RFID immunity per AIM 7351731 or equivalent ad hoc testing. Update the Operator's Manual with relevant information.

Cited: Medical Electrical Equipment and System Electromagnetic Immunity Test for Exposure to Radio Frequency Identification Readers

Inadequate Battery Safety Information

Severity: major

The device relies on an internal battery for backup, but insufficient information was provided regarding its safety when integrated with the device. Specific information required includes device's surface temperature in the event of a battery short circuit and demonstration that battery manufacturer safety requirements are met after integration.

Recommended response: Provide comprehensive data on battery safety, including short-circuit temperature and confirmation that manufacturer safety requirements are met post-integration.

Inadequate Evaluation of Critical Alarms in Human Factors Study

Severity: critical

The human factors (HF) validation study did not adequately evaluate participants’ ability to detect, comprehend, and implement appropriate actions in response to critical alarms. None of the scenarios evaluated critical audible and visual alarms within the context of an alarm status, preventing participants from detecting, troubleshooting, and responding to alarms in a timeframe necessary to prevent patient harm.

Recommended response: Redesign and conduct HF study scenarios to specifically evaluate user performance in detecting, interpreting, and responding to critical alarms within clinically relevant timeframes.

Confounding Variables in Human Factors Study

Severity: major

Confounding variables (incorrect system set-up, moderator error, missing device components) occurred during the study, interrupting participant simulation of several critical tasks, which may have confounded the interpretation of study results.

Recommended response: Ensure rigorous study design and execution in future HF studies to eliminate confounding variables and ensure data integrity.

Unmitigated Use Errors and Difficulties in Human Factors Study

Severity: critical

Numerous use errors and difficulties with critical tasks occurred in the study that could result in delay or interruption of therapy, and overdose. While clinical evidence for brief interruptions was provided, the HF study data is inadequate to demonstrate users can detect and respond to critical alarms within the necessary timeframe to avoid patient harm.

Recommended response: Implement additional mitigation strategies for identified use errors and difficulties, and validate their effectiveness in a new HF study.

Unvalidated User Interface Modifications

Severity: major

Acknowledged revisions to the Usability FMEA, Quick References Guide (QRG), Operator's Manual (OM), and Training Program were made to address observed use errors, but these modifications were not validated in a subsequent human factors study. The agency disagrees with the sponsor's assertion that no additional testing is required, citing that these changes constitute alterations to the user interface.

Recommended response: Update the use-related risk analysis and conduct a new HF validation study using the finalized intend-to-market user interface, including all revised QRG, OM, and training program materials. Submit the HF study protocol for agency review.

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
NDA 505(b)(2)

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
365 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The primary themes are manufacturing quality issues, insufficient device performance and safety data, and critical flaws in the human factors validation study, all of which prevent approval.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…