Inadequate In-Process Adhesion and Tack Tests
Severity: majorThe in-process adhesion and tack tests have not been demonstrated to be suitable for ensuring the quality and in vivo adhesion of the commercial-scale product. There was a high frequency of invalid results and non-comparable profiles between batches.
Recommended response: Develop and validate in-process tests for tack and adhesion, justifying acceptable ranges using results obtained during the manufacture of drug product batches with acceptable in vivo adhesion properties.
Inadequate Finished Drug Product Specification for Adhesion
Severity: criticalThe proposed finished product specification lacks a validated test and appropriate acceptance criteria for Part Tack. The current adhesion test (TP074) is highly variable, subjective, and does not ensure adequate in vivo adhesion properties requisite for safe and efficacious use.
Recommended response: Develop and validate tests for part tack and adhesion for release and stability on the finished drug product, justifying acceptable ranges using results obtained from finished drug product batches with acceptable in vivo adhesion properties.
Manufacturing Facility Inspection Findings
Severity: criticalDuring a recent inspection of the Corium International Inc. (FEI 3003693015) manufacturing facility, objectionable conditions were observed by the field investigator.
Recommended response: Satisfactorily resolve the objectionable conditions observed at the manufacturing facility (FEI 3003693015).
Clinical Efficacy and Adhesion Performance
Severity: criticalClinical trial (ATI-CL23) showed 11.3% of patches with less than 75% adherence and over half of subjects reported complete patch detachment. The Pearl Index was higher than expected (5.83), with significant on-treatment pregnancies, high withdrawal/dropout rates (>50%), and unscheduled bleeding (>40%). The extent to which adhesion issues affected efficacy, bleeding, and discontinuation is unclear, and the reduced efficacy is not deemed to outweigh risks and uncertainties.
Recommended response: Assess whether unacceptable in vivo adhesion properties are due to product design/formulation or other factors, and how this impacts efficacy, cycle control, and safety. Address implications of delayed patch application, high withdrawal, and dropout rates. If due to design/formulation, design a new transdermal system and conduct a new clinical trial in the US population.
Initial Pediatric Study Plan (iPSP) Submission
Severity: minorAn Initial Pediatric Study Plan (iPSP) must be submitted within 60 days of an End-of-Phase-2 (EOP2) meeting, or as per guidance, outlining planned pediatric studies or requesting waivers/deferrals. Failure to include an Agreed iPSP with a marketing application could result in a refuse to file action.
Recommended response: Submit an Initial Pediatric Study Plan (iPSP) within 60 days of an End-of-Phase-2 (EOP2) meeting, or as per guidance, in PDF and Word format, outlining planned pediatric studies or requesting waivers/deferrals.
Cited: 21 U.S.C. 355c
Updated Content of Labeling (SPL Format)
Severity: minorThe response must include updated content of labeling in structured product labeling (SPL) format.
Recommended response: Include updated content of labeling in Structured Product Labeling (SPL) format with the response to deficiencies.
Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)
Proprietary Name Resubmission
Severity: infoThe proposed proprietary name, Twirla, was found acceptable pending approval of the application. It needs to be resubmitted when responding to the application deficiencies.
Recommended response: Resubmit the proposed proprietary name, Twirla, with the response to application deficiencies.
Comprehensive Safety Update
Severity: majorA comprehensive safety update is required as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), including all new nonclinical and clinical safety data, detailed changes in safety profile, comparative tabulations of adverse events, reasons for discontinuations, case report forms for deaths/serious adverse events, and updated exposure information.
Recommended response: Provide a comprehensive safety update as per 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), including all new nonclinical and clinical safety data, detailed changes in safety profile, comparative tabulations of adverse events, reasons for discontinuations, case report forms for deaths/serious adverse events, and updated exposure information.
Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)