Insufficient data on shoulder joint and surrounding tissue adverse events
Severity: majorAdverse events related to the shoulder joint and surrounding tissues were observed post-arthroscopic subacromial decompression surgery. Insufficient data (limited subjects, lack of appropriate comparator) prevent determination of whether SABER-bupivacaine causes clinically relevant adverse reactions compared to bupivacaine HCl or non-SABER placebo.
Recommended response: Conduct a randomized, double-blinded safety study evaluating shoulder joint AEs with appropriate comparators, sufficient subjects (to detect ≥1% incidence), and long-term follow-up. Discuss study design with the Division prior to implementation.
Increased risk of skin and underlying tissue adverse events
Severity: majorIncreased risk of bruising, hematoma, pruritus, and dehiscence occurred following administration of SABER-containing products compared to bupivacaine HCL. Insufficient data to determine if the risk is greater with SABER-bupivacaine or specific surgical procedures.
Recommended response: Conduct a randomized, double-blinded safety study evaluating skin and underlying tissue AEs, incorporating standardized definitions, across all surgical procedures studied. Discuss study design with the Division prior to implementation.
Marked increased risk of neurologically related adverse events
Severity: majorA marked increased risk of dizziness, dysgeusia, headache, hypoesthesia, paresthesia, and somnolence was observed with SABER-containing products compared to bupivacaine HCl. Insufficient data to determine if the risk is greater with SABER-bupivacaine for specific procedures or the clinical impact (e.g., delayed discharge).
Recommended response: Conduct a randomized, double-blinded safety study evaluating neurotoxicity AEs, capturing clinical impact and duration of systemic exposure, across all surgical procedures studied. Discuss study design with the Division prior to implementation.
Labeling comments reserved until application is adequate
Severity: infoThe agency reserves comment on the proposed labeling until the application is otherwise adequate. Any revised labeling must include updated content of labeling in Structured Product Labeling (SPL) format.
Recommended response: Revise labeling in SPL format once all clinical deficiencies are resolved and the application is deemed otherwise adequate.
Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)
Comprehensive safety update required with response
Severity: majorA comprehensive safety update, as described in 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), is required when responding to the deficiencies. This includes data from all nonclinical and clinical studies, significant changes in safety profile, new data tabulations, case report forms for deaths/SAEs, updated exposure information, and worldwide experience.
Recommended response: Prepare a detailed safety update for resubmission, incorporating all requested data and analyses according to regulatory requirements.
Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)