Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 204803 (Jan 1, 2022)

Issued January 1, 2022

Issued

January 1, 2022

Application

Other • 204803

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due January 1, 2023Product may be marketed.

Summary

The FDA issued a Complete Response letter for DURECT Corporation's New Drug Application (NDA) 204803 for POSIMIR (bupivacaine extended-release solution), indicating that the application cannot be approved in its current form. The primary reasons for non-approval are insufficient clinical data to demonstrate the safety of POSIMIR, specifically regarding adverse events related to shoulder joints, skin/underlying tissues (bruising, hematoma, pruritus, dehiscence), and neurologically related adverse events (dizziness, dysgeusia, headache, hypoesthesia, paresthesia, somnolence). The letter outlines specific additional studies required to characterize the risk profile and details requirements for a comprehensive safety update.

Key points

  • Conduct additional studies to adequately characterize the risk profile of SABER-bupivacaine for adverse reactions associated with the shoulder joint and surrounding tissues, including the skin, following arthroscopic subacromial decompression.
  • Ensure safety assessments in the shoulder joint study are performed at appropriate intervals and for an appropriate period to capture onset, duration, and late-onset events.
  • Solicit input from expert consultants for the design of the shoulder joint study, particularly regarding appropriate assessments, frequency, and duration of follow-up.
  • Include SABER-bupivacaine and either bupivacaine HCL or a non-SABER containing placebo (or both) as treatments in the shoulder joint study.
  • Design the shoulder joint study as randomized and double-blinded, including enough subjects to detect reactions with an incidence rate of ≥ 1%.
  • Collect efficacy data during the shoulder joint study to provide clinical context for safety data.
  • Discuss the design of the shoulder joint study with the Division prior to implementation.
  • Conduct a safety study evaluating the occurrence of adverse reactions associated with the skin and underlying tissues.

Cited reasons

  • Insufficient data on shoulder joint and surrounding tissue adverse events
  • Increased risk of skin and underlying tissue adverse events
  • Marked increased risk of neurologically related adverse events
  • Labeling comments reserved until application is adequate
  • Comprehensive safety update required with response
  • The application cannot be approved in its present form due to insufficient clinical safety data. The agency identified significant deficiencies related to the characterization of adverse events associated with SABER-bupivacaine, including those affecting the shoulder joint, skin/tissues, and neurological systems. Additional clinical studies are required to adequately assess the product's risk profile.

Recommended actions

  • Conduct additional studies to adequately characterize the risk profile of SABER-bupivacaine for adverse reactions associated with the shoulder joint and surrounding tissues, including the skin, following arthroscopic subacromial decompression.
  • Ensure safety assessments in the shoulder joint study are performed at appropriate intervals and for an appropriate period to capture onset, duration, and late-onset events.
  • Solicit input from expert consultants for the design of the shoulder joint study, particularly regarding appropriate assessments, frequency, and duration of follow-up.
  • Include SABER-bupivacaine and either bupivacaine HCL or a non-SABER containing placebo (or both) as treatments in the shoulder joint study.
  • Design the shoulder joint study as randomized and double-blinded, including enough subjects to detect reactions with an incidence rate of ≥ 1%.
  • Collect efficacy data during the shoulder joint study to provide clinical context for safety data.
  • Discuss the design of the shoulder joint study with the Division prior to implementation.
  • Conduct a safety study evaluating the occurrence of adverse reactions associated with the skin and underlying tissues.

Deficiency summary

The application cannot be approved in its present form due to insufficient clinical safety data. The agency identified significant deficiencies related to the characterization of adverse events associated with SABER-bupivacaine, including those affecting the shoulder joint, skin/tissues, and neurological systems. Additional clinical studies are required to adequately assess the product's risk profile.

Findings

Insufficient data on shoulder joint and surrounding tissue adverse events

Severity: major

Adverse events related to the shoulder joint and surrounding tissues were observed post-arthroscopic subacromial decompression surgery. Insufficient data (limited subjects, lack of appropriate comparator) prevent determination of whether SABER-bupivacaine causes clinically relevant adverse reactions compared to bupivacaine HCl or non-SABER placebo.

Recommended response: Conduct a randomized, double-blinded safety study evaluating shoulder joint AEs with appropriate comparators, sufficient subjects (to detect ≥1% incidence), and long-term follow-up. Discuss study design with the Division prior to implementation.

Increased risk of skin and underlying tissue adverse events

Severity: major

Increased risk of bruising, hematoma, pruritus, and dehiscence occurred following administration of SABER-containing products compared to bupivacaine HCL. Insufficient data to determine if the risk is greater with SABER-bupivacaine or specific surgical procedures.

Recommended response: Conduct a randomized, double-blinded safety study evaluating skin and underlying tissue AEs, incorporating standardized definitions, across all surgical procedures studied. Discuss study design with the Division prior to implementation.

Marked increased risk of neurologically related adverse events

Severity: major

A marked increased risk of dizziness, dysgeusia, headache, hypoesthesia, paresthesia, and somnolence was observed with SABER-containing products compared to bupivacaine HCl. Insufficient data to determine if the risk is greater with SABER-bupivacaine for specific procedures or the clinical impact (e.g., delayed discharge).

Recommended response: Conduct a randomized, double-blinded safety study evaluating neurotoxicity AEs, capturing clinical impact and duration of systemic exposure, across all surgical procedures studied. Discuss study design with the Division prior to implementation.

Labeling comments reserved until application is adequate

Severity: info

The agency reserves comment on the proposed labeling until the application is otherwise adequate. Any revised labeling must include updated content of labeling in Structured Product Labeling (SPL) format.

Recommended response: Revise labeling in SPL format once all clinical deficiencies are resolved and the application is deemed otherwise adequate.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)

Comprehensive safety update required with response

Severity: major

A comprehensive safety update, as described in 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), is required when responding to the deficiencies. This includes data from all nonclinical and clinical studies, significant changes in safety profile, new data tabulations, case report forms for deaths/SAEs, updated exposure information, and worldwide experience.

Recommended response: Prepare a detailed safety update for resubmission, incorporating all requested data and analyses according to regulatory requirements.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
505(b)(2) New Drug Application

Impact

Impact score
0.75
Estimated delay
730 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The primary theme is the critical need for additional clinical safety studies to adequately characterize the risk profile of SABER-bupivacaine, particularly concerning adverse events affecting various body systems. The current data is insufficient to demonstrate safety as described in the proposed label, necessitating new trials before approval can be considered.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 25%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…