Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 206927 (Jan 1, 2019)

Issued January 1, 2019

Issued

January 1, 2019

Application

Other • 206927

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due April 1, 2019Product may be marketed.

Summary

This is a Complete Response letter from the FDA to Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Limited, for New Drug Application (NDA) 206927/Original 1 for bortezomib for injection 3.5 mg/vial. The FDA has determined that the application cannot be approved in its present form and outlines specific deficiencies related to product quality, labeling, facility inspections, and safety updates, along with recommendations for addressing these issues.

Key points

  • Provide additional stability data for batch EH15031 to demonstrate stability trends mimic those of EH12023, EH12024, and EH13001.
  • Provide additional batch data for drug product batches manufactured with the revised batch formula and manufacturing process as filed in the NDA resubmission (23-Nov-15).
  • Justify the apparent changes in reconstitution time seen in recent batches such as EH15031 and the difference in reconstitution time relative to Velcade® with regards to product quality and potential medication errors due to long reconstitution times.
  • Submit a revised manufacturing flow diagram for all steps involved in the manufacturing process, including lyophilization, capping, and packaging steps.
  • Provide a table comparing side-by-side the physico-chemical properties of the exhibit batch(es) produced using the final proposed commercial manufacturing process at the time of batch release and during long-term stability testing versus the Listed Drug (Velcade®).
  • Provide justification for why any observed differences in the physico-chemical characteristics of the final test and the reference products would not impact usability, bioavailability, as well as efficacy of the drug product.
  • Provide the clinical study report of BE study (14-VIN-648) when available, for FDA consideration of PK, PD, and safety findings as supportive evidence for the biowaiver request.
  • Change labels referring to the product as a “single-use vial” to a “single-dose vial”.

Cited reasons

  • Slower Reconstitution Time and Stability Bridging Issues
  • Incomplete Manufacturing Flow Diagram
  • Biowaiver Request and Comparability to Reference Product
  • Clinical Study Report for Biowaiver Support
  • Labeling Revisions for Vial Type and Sterility
  • Unresolved Facility Inspection Deficiencies
  • Comprehensive Safety Update Required
  • Inadequate Drug Master File (DMF) and Biowaiver Denial

Recommended actions

  • Provide additional stability data for batch EH15031 to demonstrate stability trends mimic those of EH12023, EH12024, and EH13001.
  • Provide additional batch data for drug product batches manufactured with the revised batch formula and manufacturing process as filed in the NDA resubmission (23-Nov-15).
  • Justify the apparent changes in reconstitution time seen in recent batches such as EH15031 and the difference in reconstitution time relative to Velcade® with regards to product quality and potential medication errors due to long reconstitution times.
  • Submit a revised manufacturing flow diagram for all steps involved in the manufacturing process, including lyophilization, capping, and packaging steps.
  • Provide a table comparing side-by-side the physico-chemical properties of the exhibit batch(es) produced using the final proposed commercial manufacturing process at the time of batch release and during long-term stability testing versus the Listed Drug (Velcade®).
  • Provide justification for why any observed differences in the physico-chemical characteristics of the final test and the reference products would not impact usability, bioavailability, as well as efficacy of the drug product.
  • Provide the clinical study report of BE study (14-VIN-648) when available, for FDA consideration of PK, PD, and safety findings as supportive evidence for the biowaiver request.
  • Change labels referring to the product as a “single-use vial” to a “single-dose vial”.

Deficiency summary

The application received a Complete Response due to significant product quality and manufacturing control issues, including concerns about stability bridging, an inadequate Drug Master File (DMF), and unresolved facility inspection findings. Additionally, the biowaiver request was denied, and comprehensive safety and labeling updates are required.

Findings

Slower Reconstitution Time and Stability Bridging Issues

Severity: critical

Batch EH15031 shows slower reconstitution time compared to previous registration batches, likely due to changes in batch formula and manufacturing process. Only one month of accelerated stability data is available for EH15031, showing an increase in reconstitution time approaching the specification limit. This raises concerns about bridging stability data from previous batches (EH12023, EH12024, EH13001). The agency requests additional stability data for EH15031, additional batch data for drug product batches manufactured with the revised process, and justification for the observed changes in reconstitution time relative to Velcade®.

Recommended response: Conduct additional stability studies for batch EH15031 and new batches, provide comprehensive batch data for the revised manufacturing process, and submit a detailed justification for the observed changes in reconstitution time, addressing potential impact on product quality and medication errors.

Incomplete Manufacturing Flow Diagram

Severity: minor

The submitted manufacturing flow diagram does not include lyophilization, capping, and packaging steps. The agency requests a revised flow diagram including all steps.

Recommended response: Submit a revised and complete manufacturing flow diagram that clearly depicts all steps, including lyophilization, capping, and packaging.

Biowaiver Request and Comparability to Reference Product

Severity: major

Concerns exist that physico-chemical characteristics (e.g., reconstitution time) of the proposed commercial lyophilized drug product at the end of its shelf-life may not be comparable to the reference drug product (Velcade®). To facilitate review of the biowaiver request for intravenous administration, the agency requests a side-by-side comparison table of physico-chemical properties of exhibit batches (using the final proposed commercial manufacturing process) at release and during long-term stability testing versus the Listed Drug. Justification is needed if differences exist, explaining why they would not impact usability, bioavailability, or efficacy.

Recommended response: Provide a detailed side-by-side comparison of physico-chemical properties between the proposed product and the reference drug (Velcade®) at release and throughout stability. Justify any observed differences regarding their impact on usability, bioavailability, and efficacy to support the biowaiver request.

Clinical Study Report for Biowaiver Support

Severity: major

Exhibit Batch EH15031 is being used in an ongoing BE study (14-VIN-648) in multiple myeloma patients. The agency requests the clinical study report when available, so that PK, PD, and safety findings can be considered as supportive evidence for the biowaiver request for the intravenous route.

Recommended response: Submit the clinical study report for the ongoing BE study (14-VIN-648) once available, to provide supportive PK, PD, and safety data for the intravenous biowaiver request.

Labeling Revisions for Vial Type and Sterility

Severity: minor

The labels refer to the product as a 'single-use vial' and need to be changed to 'single-dose vial'. Additionally, the labels must include a statement indicating the product is sterile. The agency requires updated content of labeling in SPL format, with a marked-up copy and a clean Microsoft Word version.

Recommended response: Revise draft labeling and carton/container labeling to change 'single-use vial' to 'single-dose vial' and add a statement indicating the product is sterile. Provide updated content of labeling in SPL format, with a marked-up copy and a clean Microsoft Word version.

Cited: 21 CFR 201.100

Unresolved Facility Inspection Deficiencies

Severity: critical

During a recent inspection of Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Limited manufacturing facility (FEI 3006549835), deficiencies were conveyed to the facility representative. Satisfactory resolution of these deficiencies is required before this application may be approved.

Recommended response: Address and resolve all deficiencies identified during the recent manufacturing facility inspection. Provide documentation of satisfactory resolution to the agency.

Cited: 21 CFR 211.22

Comprehensive Safety Update Required

Severity: major

A comprehensive safety update is required, including data from all nonclinical and clinical studies/trials regardless of indication, dosage form, or dose level. This includes describing significant changes in the safety profile, presenting new safety data combined with original NDA data, comparing frequencies of adverse events, providing retabulation of premature trial discontinuations, case report forms/narrative summaries for deaths/serious adverse events, information on changes in common adverse events, updated exposure information, worldwide safety experience, and English translations of current approved foreign labeling.

Recommended response: Submit a comprehensive safety update as per 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), incorporating all new nonclinical and clinical safety data, including detailed analyses, comparisons, case reports, and worldwide experience.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)

Inadequate Drug Master File (DMF) and Biowaiver Denial

Severity: critical

The referenced Drug Master File (DMF 23996) was found inadequate, and a deficiency letter was sent to the DMF holder. These deficiencies must be adequately addressed. The biowaiver request for an in vivo bioequivalence study for the intravenous route cannot be granted at this time due to outstanding issues with the identity of the drug substance (referencing DMF) and the identity of the structures in the drug product and reconstituted solution. The applicant may resubmit the biowaiver request or conduct a bioequivalence study.

Recommended response: Ensure the DMF holder addresses all deficiencies in DMF 23996. Resolve outstanding issues regarding drug substance and drug product identity. Resubmit the biowaiver request with adequate supporting data or conduct a bioequivalence study for the intravenous route.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(1)

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
505(b)(2) NDA

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
270 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The application received a complete response primarily due to significant product quality and manufacturing control issues, including concerns about stability bridging, an inadequate Drug Master File, and unresolved facility inspection findings. Additionally, the biowaiver request was denied, and comprehensive safety and labeling updates are required.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…