Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 207987 (Jan 1, 2018)

Issued January 1, 2018

Issued

January 1, 2018

Application

Other • 207987

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due January 1, 2019Product may be marketed.

Summary

This is a Complete Response Letter from the FDA to Belcher Pharmaceuticals, LLC, for their New Drug Application (NDA) 207987 for Ablysinol (Dehydrated Alcohol Injection, USP). The FDA has determined that the application cannot be approved at the present time due to various deficiencies related to clinical data, product quality (CMC), prescribing information, proprietary name, and facility inspections. The letter outlines specific issues and provides suggestions for addressing them, including a mandatory postmarketing study.

Key points

  • Initiate a postmarketing registry to gather information on instructions for use (particularly dose) and expected rates for adverse events for Ablysinol.
  • Resolve all unresolved Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) deficiencies, including the 'withhold' recommendation for the drug substance manufacturing facility.
  • Provide CMC information concerning validated analytical methods for inclusion in the revised drug product specification.
  • Generate product stability data using the revised product specification, which must include monitoring product critical quality attributes using validated quantitative analytical methods.
  • Adequately specify the number and types of microbiological tests to be performed as part of the revalidation/requalification program for the manufacturing process.
  • Provide adequate validation information regarding the chromogenic kinetic method for endotoxin testing.
  • Revise the carton and container labels using the approved trade name.
  • Ensure the proposed prescribing information (PI) conforms to the content and format regulations at 21 CFR 201.56(a) and (d) and 201.57.

Cited reasons

  • Clinical Data Insufficiency for Instructions for Use and Adverse Events
  • Drug Product Specification - Analytical Methods
  • Drug Product Stability Data Inadequacy
  • Microbiological Aspects - Testing and Validation
  • Carton and Container Label Revision
  • Prescribing Information Content and Format Non-conformance
  • Proprietary Name Resubmission
  • Manufacturing Facility Not Ready for Inspection

Recommended actions

  • Initiate a postmarketing registry to gather information on instructions for use (particularly dose) and expected rates for adverse events for Ablysinol.
  • Resolve all unresolved Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) deficiencies, including the 'withhold' recommendation for the drug substance manufacturing facility.
  • Provide CMC information concerning validated analytical methods for inclusion in the revised drug product specification.
  • Generate product stability data using the revised product specification, which must include monitoring product critical quality attributes using validated quantitative analytical methods.
  • Adequately specify the number and types of microbiological tests to be performed as part of the revalidation/requalification program for the manufacturing process.
  • Provide adequate validation information regarding the chromogenic kinetic method for endotoxin testing.
  • Revise the carton and container labels using the approved trade name.
  • Ensure the proposed prescribing information (PI) conforms to the content and format regulations at 21 CFR 201.56(a) and (d) and 201.57.

Deficiency summary

The application cannot be approved due to significant deficiencies across Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC), inadequate clinical safety data requiring a postmarketing study, non-conformance of labeling to regulatory requirements, and the manufacturing facility not being ready for inspection. A comprehensive safety update is also required upon resubmission.

Findings

Clinical Data Insufficiency for Instructions for Use and Adverse Events

Severity: major

Insufficient information on instructions for use (particularly dose) and expected rates for adverse events. A proposed postmarketing study design was received but needs to be initiated.

Recommended response: Initiate the proposed postmarketing registry while addressing other issues.

Drug Product Specification - Analytical Methods

Severity: major

Provide CMC information concerning the validated analytical methods to be included in the revised drug product specification.

Recommended response: Provide validated analytical methods for the revised drug product specification.

Drug Product Stability Data Inadequacy

Severity: major

Inadequate drug product stability data due to the absence of quantitative analytical methods for monitoring product attributes. New stability data using the revised product specification and validated quantitative analytical methods are required.

Recommended response: Generate new stability data using the revised product specification, including validated quantitative analytical methods for critical quality attributes.

Microbiological Aspects - Testing and Validation

Severity: major

Inadequate specification of the number and types of tests for the revalidation/requalification program. Inadequate validation information for the chromogenic kinetic endotoxin testing method.

Recommended response: Adequately specify microbiological tests for revalidation/requalification and provide adequate validation for endotoxin testing.

Carton and Container Label Revision

Severity: minor

Revise the carton and container labels using the approved trade name.

Recommended response: Update carton and container labels with the approved trade name.

Prescribing Information Content and Format Non-conformance

Severity: major

Proposed prescribing information (PI) must conform to content and format regulations (21 CFR 201.56(a) and (d) and 201.57). Formatting errors need correction using SRPI checklist. Updated content of labeling (21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)) in SPL format is required.

Recommended response: Revise PI to conform to regulations, use SRPI checklist, and submit updated content in SPL format.

Cited: 21 CFR 201.56(a), 21 CFR 201.56(d), 21 CFR 201.57, 21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)

Proprietary Name Resubmission

Severity: info

The proposed proprietary name was found acceptable pending approval, but needs to be resubmitted with the response to application deficiencies.

Recommended response: Resubmit the proposed proprietary name with the complete response.

Manufacturing Facility Not Ready for Inspection

Severity: critical

The manufacturing facility was not ready for inspection, which is a prerequisite for application approval.

Recommended response: Notify the agency in writing when the facility is ready for inspection.

Safety Update Required for Resubmission

Severity: major

A comprehensive safety update is required upon resubmission, including significant changes, new safety data, retabulations, case reports for deaths/serious AEs, updated exposure, worldwide experience, and foreign labeling translations.

Recommended response: Prepare a detailed safety update as per 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b) for resubmission.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)

Postmarketing Study Requirement for Safety Assessment

Severity: critical

A registry of patients undergoing PTSMA with Ablysinol is required under Section 505(o)(3) of the FDCA to assess known serious risks (heart block, cardiac arrhythmias, MI, coronary artery dissection) due to limited safety information in the application and insufficiency of spontaneous reporting.

Recommended response: Establish a prospective registry of patients undergoing PTSMA with Ablysinol to collect peri/post-procedural adverse event data.

Cited: Section 505(o)(3)

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
505(b)(2) NDA

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
545 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The application for Ablysinol faces significant hurdles to approval, primarily stemming from unresolved CMC issues, inadequate clinical safety data requiring a postmarketing study, non-compliant labeling, and a manufacturing facility not ready for inspection. The agency emphasizes the need for robust data, validated methods, and full regulatory compliance before approval can be granted.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…