Clinical Data Insufficiency for Instructions for Use and Adverse Events
Severity: majorInsufficient information on instructions for use (particularly dose) and expected rates for adverse events. A proposed postmarketing study design was received but needs to be initiated.
Recommended response: Initiate the proposed postmarketing registry while addressing other issues.
Drug Product Specification - Analytical Methods
Severity: majorProvide CMC information concerning the validated analytical methods to be included in the revised drug product specification.
Recommended response: Provide validated analytical methods for the revised drug product specification.
Drug Product Stability Data Inadequacy
Severity: majorInadequate drug product stability data due to the absence of quantitative analytical methods for monitoring product attributes. New stability data using the revised product specification and validated quantitative analytical methods are required.
Recommended response: Generate new stability data using the revised product specification, including validated quantitative analytical methods for critical quality attributes.
Microbiological Aspects - Testing and Validation
Severity: majorInadequate specification of the number and types of tests for the revalidation/requalification program. Inadequate validation information for the chromogenic kinetic endotoxin testing method.
Recommended response: Adequately specify microbiological tests for revalidation/requalification and provide adequate validation for endotoxin testing.
Carton and Container Label Revision
Severity: minorRevise the carton and container labels using the approved trade name.
Recommended response: Update carton and container labels with the approved trade name.
Prescribing Information Content and Format Non-conformance
Severity: majorProposed prescribing information (PI) must conform to content and format regulations (21 CFR 201.56(a) and (d) and 201.57). Formatting errors need correction using SRPI checklist. Updated content of labeling (21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)) in SPL format is required.
Recommended response: Revise PI to conform to regulations, use SRPI checklist, and submit updated content in SPL format.
Cited: 21 CFR 201.56(a), 21 CFR 201.56(d), 21 CFR 201.57, 21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)
Proprietary Name Resubmission
Severity: infoThe proposed proprietary name was found acceptable pending approval, but needs to be resubmitted with the response to application deficiencies.
Recommended response: Resubmit the proposed proprietary name with the complete response.
Manufacturing Facility Not Ready for Inspection
Severity: criticalThe manufacturing facility was not ready for inspection, which is a prerequisite for application approval.
Recommended response: Notify the agency in writing when the facility is ready for inspection.
Safety Update Required for Resubmission
Severity: majorA comprehensive safety update is required upon resubmission, including significant changes, new safety data, retabulations, case reports for deaths/serious AEs, updated exposure, worldwide experience, and foreign labeling translations.
Recommended response: Prepare a detailed safety update as per 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b) for resubmission.
Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)
Postmarketing Study Requirement for Safety Assessment
Severity: criticalA registry of patients undergoing PTSMA with Ablysinol is required under Section 505(o)(3) of the FDCA to assess known serious risks (heart block, cardiac arrhythmias, MI, coronary artery dissection) due to limited safety information in the application and insufficiency of spontaneous reporting.
Recommended response: Establish a prospective registry of patients undergoing PTSMA with Ablysinol to collect peri/post-procedural adverse event data.
Cited: Section 505(o)(3)