Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 208969 (Jan 1, 2023)

Issued January 1, 2023

Issued

January 1, 2023

Application

Other • 208969

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due January 1, 2024Product may be marketed.

Summary

The FDA issued a Complete Response letter for Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s New Drug Application (NDA) 208969 for Naloxone Nasal Spray, indicating that the application cannot be approved in its present form due to several deficiencies. These include issues with the human factors validation study, pediatric safety concerns regarding product administration and absorption, unresolved manufacturing facility deficiencies, and the need for a comprehensive safety update. The letter provides recommendations for addressing these issues and outlines the process for resubmission or other actions.

Key points

  • Address deficiencies identified in the human factors (HF) validation study, as the product user interface does not support safe and effective use by all intended users.
  • Address pediatric safety concerns related to potential run-off into the posterior pharynx, aspiration risk, and inadequate absorption in the youngest pediatric patients, and consider reformulating the product for use in all age ranges down to birth.
  • Review labeling review resources (PLR Requirements, Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule, SRPI checklist) and ensure that any revised prescribing information conforms with format items in regulations and guidances, including updated content of labeling in SPL format.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name when responding to the application deficiencies.
  • Ensure satisfactory resolution of device (21 CFR 820) deficiencies identified during the inspection of the International Medication Systems Limited manufacturing facility.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), detailing significant changes or findings in the safety profile, presenting new safety data from studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication, tabulating new safety data combined with original application data, and including tables comparing frequencies of adverse events.
  • Resubmit the application or take other actions available under 21 CFR 314.110 within one year, clearly marking the resubmission as 'RESUBMISSION' and stating it is a complete response to all deficiencies.
  • Based on the results of the human factors (HF) validation study, the product user interface does not support a conclusion that all intended users can use this product safely and effectively.

Cited reasons

  • Human Factors Validation Study Inadequacy
  • Pediatric Safety and Efficacy Concerns
  • Proprietary Name Review Terminated
  • Manufacturing Facility Deficiencies
  • Safety Update Required for Resubmission
  • The application was not approved due to inadequate human factors validation, significant pediatric safety and efficacy concerns (aspiration risk, absorption), unresolved manufacturing facility deficiencies, and pending proprietary name review.

Recommended actions

  • Address deficiencies identified in the human factors (HF) validation study, as the product user interface does not support safe and effective use by all intended users.
  • Address pediatric safety concerns related to potential run-off into the posterior pharynx, aspiration risk, and inadequate absorption in the youngest pediatric patients, and consider reformulating the product for use in all age ranges down to birth.
  • Review labeling review resources (PLR Requirements, Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule, SRPI checklist) and ensure that any revised prescribing information conforms with format items in regulations and guidances, including updated content of labeling in SPL format.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name when responding to the application deficiencies.
  • Ensure satisfactory resolution of device (21 CFR 820) deficiencies identified during the inspection of the International Medication Systems Limited manufacturing facility.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), detailing significant changes or findings in the safety profile, presenting new safety data from studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication, tabulating new safety data combined with original application data, and including tables comparing frequencies of adverse events.
  • Resubmit the application or take other actions available under 21 CFR 314.110 within one year, clearly marking the resubmission as 'RESUBMISSION' and stating it is a complete response to all deficiencies.

Deficiency summary

The application was not approved due to inadequate human factors validation, significant pediatric safety and efficacy concerns (aspiration risk, absorption), unresolved manufacturing facility deficiencies, and pending proprietary name review.

Findings

Human Factors Validation Study Inadequacy

Severity: major

Based on the results of the human factors (HF) validation study, the product user interface does not support a conclusion that all intended users can use this product safely and effectively.

Recommended response: Conduct additional human factors studies to demonstrate safe and effective use by all intended users, addressing identified user interface issues.

Pediatric Safety and Efficacy Concerns

Severity: critical

Administration of the proposed product has the potential to lead to run-off into the posterior pharynx, especially in the youngest pediatric patients, raising safety concerns surrounding respiratory complications due to aspiration and effectiveness concerns due to inadequate absorption of naloxone. The pediatric assessment does not adequately address these concerns to support use of the product down to birth. The application must support the use of the product in all age ranges, including children down to birth. Consider re-formulating your product for use in adults and pediatric patients down to birth.

Recommended response: Provide additional data to address pediatric safety and efficacy, particularly regarding aspiration risk and absorption. Consider product reformulation or alternative delivery methods suitable for all pediatric age groups, including neonates.

Proprietary Name Review Terminated

Severity: minor

The review of your proposed proprietary name has been terminated due to the deficiencies with the application as described in this letter. Please resubmit the proposed proprietary name when you respond to the application deficiencies.

Recommended response: Resubmit the proposed proprietary name once all other application deficiencies have been adequately addressed.

Manufacturing Facility Deficiencies

Severity: major

During a recent inspection of the International Medication Systems Limited (FEI 2016148) manufacturing facility for this application, our field investigator conveyed device (21 CFR 820) deficiencies to the representative of the facility. Satisfactory resolution of these deficiencies is required before this application may be approved.

Recommended response: Address and resolve all deficiencies identified during the facility inspection at International Medication Systems Limited, providing documentation of satisfactory resolution.

Cited: 21 CFR 820

Safety Update Required for Resubmission

Severity: info

When responding to the deficiencies, include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b). The safety update should include data from all nonclinical and clinical studies/trials of the drug under consideration regardless of indication, dosage form, or dose level, detailing any significant changes or findings in the safety profile and presenting new safety data combined with original application data.

Recommended response: Prepare a comprehensive safety update as per 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), incorporating all new nonclinical and clinical safety data, and present it in the required format upon resubmission.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
545 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

Key themes include critical pediatric safety and efficacy gaps, insufficient human factors validation for safe use, and unresolved manufacturing quality system issues, all contributing to the non-approvability of the product.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…