Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 209191 (Jan 1, 2018)

Issued January 1, 2018

Issued

January 1, 2018

Application

Other • 209191

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due January 1, 2019Product may be marketed.

Summary

This document contains two Complete Response letters from the FDA to Hospira, Inc. regarding their New Drug Application (NDA) 209191 for Bortezomib for Injection. Both letters state that the application cannot be approved in its current form and outline deficiencies that need to be addressed for resubmission. The first letter (dated February 22, 2018) primarily focuses on product quality (elemental impurities), labeling, and safety update requirements. The second letter (dated November 3, 2017, though appearing later in the text) highlights deficiencies found during a manufacturing facility inspection, in addition to similar labeling and safety update requirements.

Key points

  • Establish a validated test method for elemental impurities as part of the drug product specification consistent with ICH Q3D and USP <232/233>.
  • Update the drug product specifications with controls for elemental impurities, if necessary.
  • Satisfactorily resolve deficiencies identified during the manufacturing facility inspection.
  • Review labeling review resources on PLR Requirements for Prescribing Information and Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule websites.
  • Use the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI) checklist to ensure prescribing information conforms with format items in regulations and guidances.
  • Include updated content of labeling [21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)] in structured product labeling (SPL) format.
  • Submit draft carton and container labeling that are identical to previously submitted versions.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b).

Cited reasons

  • Failure to establish validated test method for elemental impurities
  • Inadequate prescribing information content and format
  • Inadequate carton and container labeling
  • Incomplete and inadequate safety update
  • Missing English translations of foreign labeling
  • Unresolved manufacturing facility inspection deficiencies
  • The application received a Complete Response Letter due to unresolved issues in product quality (elemental impurities), comprehensive labeling updates (prescribing information, carton/container), and a requirement for a thorough safety update including clinical data re-analysis and worldwide experience. Additionally, manufacturing facility inspection deficiencies remain unresolved.

Recommended actions

  • Establish a validated test method for elemental impurities as part of the drug product specification consistent with ICH Q3D and USP <232/233>.
  • Update the drug product specifications with controls for elemental impurities, if necessary.
  • Satisfactorily resolve deficiencies identified during the manufacturing facility inspection.
  • Review labeling review resources on PLR Requirements for Prescribing Information and Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule websites.
  • Use the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI) checklist to ensure prescribing information conforms with format items in regulations and guidances.
  • Include updated content of labeling [21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)] in structured product labeling (SPL) format.
  • Submit draft carton and container labeling that are identical to previously submitted versions.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b).

Deficiency summary

The application received a Complete Response Letter due to unresolved issues in product quality (elemental impurities), comprehensive labeling updates (prescribing information, carton/container), and a requirement for a thorough safety update including clinical data re-analysis and worldwide experience. Additionally, manufacturing facility inspection deficiencies remain unresolved.

Findings

Failure to establish validated test method for elemental impurities

Severity: major

Establish a validated test method for elemental impurities as part of the drug product specification consistent with ICH Q3D and USP <232/233>. Update the drug product specifications accordingly with controls for elemental impurities, if necessary.

Recommended response: Develop and validate a test method for elemental impurities, update drug product specifications, and provide supporting data demonstrating compliance with ICH Q3D and USP <232/233>.

Cited: ICH Q3D, USP <232/233>

Inadequate prescribing information content and format

Severity: major

The proposed labeling is not adequate. Review the labeling review resources on the PLR Requirements for Prescribing Information and Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule websites, including regulations and related guidance documents and the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI) − a checklist of important format items from labeling regulations and guidances. If you revise labeling, use the SRPI checklist to ensure that the prescribing information conforms with format items in regulations and guidances. Your response must include updated content of labeling [21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)] in structured product labeling (SPL) format.

Recommended response: Revise prescribing information to comply with PLR requirements, Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule, and SRPI checklist. Submit updated content in SPL format.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)

Inadequate carton and container labeling

Severity: major

Submit draft carton and container labeling that are identical to the carton and immediate container labels submitted on December 22, 2017 (or October 18, 2017, as referenced in a prior letter).

Recommended response: Ensure carton and container labeling are consistent with the final approved prescribing information and resubmit updated drafts.

Incomplete and inadequate safety update

Severity: critical

Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b). The safety update should include data from all nonclinical and clinical studies/trials of the drug under consideration regardless of indication, dosage form, or dose level. Specific requirements include: describing significant changes in safety profile, presenting new safety data (tabulations, comparisons), retabulating premature discontinuations, providing case report forms/narrative summaries for deaths/serious adverse events, describing changes in common adverse events, providing updated exposure information, and summarizing worldwide experience.

Recommended response: Provide a comprehensive safety update incorporating all new nonclinical and clinical data, detailed analyses of adverse events, patient narratives, exposure data, and worldwide experience, adhering to 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b).

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)

Missing English translations of foreign labeling

Severity: minor

Provide English translations of current approved foreign labeling not previously submitted.

Recommended response: Submit English translations for all current approved foreign labeling that has not yet been provided.

Unresolved manufacturing facility inspection deficiencies

Severity: critical

During a recent inspection of the manufacturing facility for this NDA, our field investigator conveyed deficiencies to the representative of the facility. Satisfactory resolution of these deficiencies is required before this NDA may be approved.

Recommended response: Address and resolve all deficiencies identified during the manufacturing facility inspection and provide documentation of satisfactory resolution to the agency.

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA)

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
365 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The primary themes for non-approval are deficiencies in product quality control, inadequate and non-compliant labeling, and insufficient safety data presentation and analysis. Resolution of manufacturing site inspection findings is also critical for approval.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…