Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 209510 (Jan 1, 2020)

Issued January 1, 2020

Issued

January 1, 2020

Application

Other • 209510

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due December 31, 2020Product may be marketed.

Summary

The FDA issued a Complete Response letter for New Drug Application (NDA) 209510 for Barhemsys (amisulpride) injection, indicating that the application cannot be approved in its current form. Deficiencies were identified in product quality/facility inspections, prescribing information, proprietary name, and safety update requirements. The letter outlines specific actions and data submissions required for potential approval, including resolving manufacturing issues, providing comprehensive safety data updates, and addressing labeling concerns.

Key points

  • Satisfactorily resolve deficiencies identified during the manufacturing facility inspection.
  • Review labeling review resources including PLR Requirements for Prescribing Information, Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule websites, regulations, guidance documents, and the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI).
  • If revising labeling, use the SRPI checklist to ensure conformity with format items in regulations and guidances.
  • Include updated content of labeling [21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)] in structured product labeling (SPL) format.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name, Barhemsys, when responding to application deficiencies.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b).
  • Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile.
  • Incorporate new safety data into sections describing discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, and common adverse events by presenting new safety data from studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication using the same format as the original submission, presenting tabulations of the new safety data combined with the original application data, including tables that compare frequencies of adverse events in the original application with the retabulated frequencies, and providing separate tables for the frequencies of adverse events occurring in clinical trials for indications other than the proposed indication.

Cited reasons

  • Manufacturing Facility Deficiencies
  • Prescribing Information (Labeling) Inadequacies
  • Proprietary Name Resubmission Required
  • Inadequate Safety Update and Data Presentation
  • Insufficient Pharmacokinetic Data in Severe Renal Impairment
  • The application cannot be approved in its present form due to unresolved manufacturing facility deficiencies, inadequate prescribing information, and insufficient safety data, particularly regarding the safety update requirements and pharmacokinetic characterization in severe renal impairment. The proprietary name also needs to be resubmitted.

Recommended actions

  • Satisfactorily resolve deficiencies identified during the manufacturing facility inspection.
  • Review labeling review resources including PLR Requirements for Prescribing Information, Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule websites, regulations, guidance documents, and the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI).
  • If revising labeling, use the SRPI checklist to ensure conformity with format items in regulations and guidances.
  • Include updated content of labeling [21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)] in structured product labeling (SPL) format.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name, Barhemsys, when responding to application deficiencies.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b).
  • Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile.
  • Incorporate new safety data into sections describing discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, and common adverse events by presenting new safety data from studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication using the same format as the original submission, presenting tabulations of the new safety data combined with the original application data, including tables that compare frequencies of adverse events in the original application with the retabulated frequencies, and providing separate tables for the frequencies of adverse events occurring in clinical trials for indications other than the proposed indication.

Deficiency summary

The application cannot be approved in its present form due to unresolved manufacturing facility deficiencies, inadequate prescribing information, and insufficient safety data, particularly regarding the safety update requirements and pharmacokinetic characterization in severe renal impairment. The proprietary name also needs to be resubmitted.

Findings

Manufacturing Facility Deficiencies

Severity: critical

Satisfactory resolution of deficiencies observed during a recent inspection of the manufacturing facility is required before this application may be approved.

Recommended response: Address all observations from the facility inspection and provide evidence of satisfactory resolution, including corrective and preventive actions (CAPA).

Cited: Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Finished Pharmaceuticals

Prescribing Information (Labeling) Inadequacies

Severity: major

The proposed labeling is not adequate and requires revision to conform to content and format regulations. The agency reserves full comment until the application is otherwise adequate.

Recommended response: Revise the Prescribing Information (PI) according to the appended version and ensure full compliance with 21 CFR 201.56(a), (d) and 201.57, utilizing FDA labeling resources.

Cited: Content and format of labeling for human prescription drug and biological products, Content and format of labeling for human prescription drug and biological products, Specific requirements on content and format of labeling for human prescription drug and biological products

Proprietary Name Resubmission Required

Severity: minor

The proposed proprietary name 'Barhemsys' was found acceptable pending approval of the application in the current review cycle. It needs to be resubmitted with the response to application deficiencies.

Recommended response: Resubmit the proprietary name with the complete response package.

Inadequate Safety Update and Data Presentation

Severity: major

The safety update is insufficient and requires detailed changes, including describing significant changes in safety profile, presenting new safety data from studies/clinical trials (for proposed and other indications), retabulating reasons for premature trial discontinuation, providing case report forms and narrative summaries for deaths/serious adverse events, describing changes in common adverse events, providing updated exposure information, and summarizing worldwide safety experience with English translations of foreign labeling.

Recommended response: Provide a comprehensive safety update as per 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), including all requested data, analyses, and summaries from clinical and nonclinical studies, worldwide experience, and foreign labeling.

Cited: Safety update requirements for NDAs

Insufficient Pharmacokinetic Data in Severe Renal Impairment

Severity: major

The pharmacokinetics of amisulpride in patients with severe renal impairment is not adequately characterized, leading to unsupported dosing recommendations for this population. A dedicated pharmacokinetic study in severe renal impairment and end-stage renal disease patients is recommended to inform dosing.

Recommended response: Conduct a pharmacokinetic study in patients with severe renal impairment and end-stage renal disease, and healthy controls, to adequately characterize amisulpride pharmacokinetics and support dosing recommendations.

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
505(b)(2) New Drug Application (NDA)

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
365 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The application received a Complete Response due to critical manufacturing deficiencies, significant gaps in safety data presentation and analysis, and inadequate clinical pharmacology characterization for a vulnerable patient population, alongside required labeling updates.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…