Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 209529 (Jan 1, 2020)

Issued January 1, 2020

Issued

January 1, 2020

Application

Other • 209529

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due December 31, 2020Product may be marketed.

Summary

The FDA issued a Complete Response letter for NDA 209529 for solifenacin succinate oral suspension, indicating that the application cannot be approved in its current form due to manufacturing facility deficiencies, inadequate control of raw material quality, and insufficient drug product specifications and stability programs regarding objectionable microorganisms. The letter outlines specific actions required for resubmission.

Key points

  • Satisfactorily resolve objectionable conditions observed during the manufacturing facility inspection.
  • Submit results from ongoing characterization studies, including a summary of investigations and corrective/preventive actions taken to address the root cause of raw material quality issues.
  • Establish and validate additional tests and acceptance criteria for the raw material.
  • Submit batch analyses from three verification/validation batches demonstrating that drug product manufactured with the raw material meeting NF and additional quality requirements has the requisite quality (e.g., viscosity), including executed batch records, validation protocol, and final summary report.
  • If suitable additional controls for the raw material cannot be identified and validated, or if the supplier cannot provide raw material meeting enhanced specifications, propose a revision of acceptance criteria for drug product viscosity, with justification and release/stability data confirming no adverse impact on quality and performance.
  • Revise the drug product specification to include test method(s) and acceptance criteria to assure the product is free of objectionable microorganisms.
  • Update relevant sections of the application to reflect revised drug product specifications.
  • Revise the post-approval stability program to include testing to confirm the absence of objectionable microorganisms.

Cited reasons

  • Unresolved Manufacturing Facility Inspection Observations
  • Inadequate Control of Raw Material Quality
  • Insufficient Microbial Control in Drug Product Specification and Stability Program
  • Prescribing Information and Carton/Container Labeling Deficiencies
  • Required Safety Update for Resubmission
  • The application cannot be approved due to unresolved objectionable conditions at the manufacturing facility, inadequate control over raw material quality leading to out-of-specification drug product, and insufficient drug product specifications and stability program to ensure freedom from objectionable microorganisms. Additionally, the proposed prescribing information and carton/container labeling require revisions to comply with regulatory requirements, and a comprehensive safety update is needed for resubmission.

Recommended actions

  • Satisfactorily resolve objectionable conditions observed during the manufacturing facility inspection.
  • Submit results from ongoing characterization studies, including a summary of investigations and corrective/preventive actions taken to address the root cause of raw material quality issues.
  • Establish and validate additional tests and acceptance criteria for the raw material.
  • Submit batch analyses from three verification/validation batches demonstrating that drug product manufactured with the raw material meeting NF and additional quality requirements has the requisite quality (e.g., viscosity), including executed batch records, validation protocol, and final summary report.
  • If suitable additional controls for the raw material cannot be identified and validated, or if the supplier cannot provide raw material meeting enhanced specifications, propose a revision of acceptance criteria for drug product viscosity, with justification and release/stability data confirming no adverse impact on quality and performance.
  • Revise the drug product specification to include test method(s) and acceptance criteria to assure the product is free of objectionable microorganisms.
  • Update relevant sections of the application to reflect revised drug product specifications.
  • Revise the post-approval stability program to include testing to confirm the absence of objectionable microorganisms.

Deficiency summary

The application cannot be approved due to unresolved objectionable conditions at the manufacturing facility, inadequate control over raw material quality leading to out-of-specification drug product, and insufficient drug product specifications and stability program to ensure freedom from objectionable microorganisms. Additionally, the proposed prescribing information and carton/container labeling require revisions to comply with regulatory requirements, and a comprehensive safety update is needed for resubmission.

Findings

Unresolved Manufacturing Facility Inspection Observations

Severity: critical

During a recent inspection of the manufacturing facility, objectionable conditions were observed, and satisfactory resolution of these observations is required before this NDA may be approved.

Recommended response: Satisfactorily resolve all observations noted during the manufacturing facility inspection.

Inadequate Control of Raw Material Quality

Severity: major

The quality of a specific raw material is not adequately controlled, resulting in drug product batches that do not meet the proposed drug product specification.

Recommended response: Submit results from ongoing characterization studies, including a summary of investigations and corrective/preventive actions. Establish and validate additional tests and acceptance criteria for the raw material. Provide batch analyses from three verification/validation batches demonstrating requisite drug product quality. Consider revising drug product viscosity acceptance criteria with justification and supporting data if enhanced raw material specifications cannot be met.

Insufficient Microbial Control in Drug Product Specification and Stability Program

Severity: critical

The drug product specification and post-approval stability program do not include the necessary test methods and acceptance criteria to demonstrate that the product is free, and remains free, of objectionable microorganisms.

Recommended response: Revise the drug product specification to include test method(s) and acceptance criteria to assure the product is free of objectionable microorganisms. Update relevant sections of the application and revise the post-approval stability program to include testing to confirm the absence of objectionable microorganisms.

Prescribing Information and Carton/Container Labeling Deficiencies

Severity: major

The proposed prescribing information (PI) must conform to content and format regulations (21 CFR 201.56(a) and (d), 201.57). The SRPI checklist should be used to correct formatting errors. Updated content of labeling (21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)) in structured product labeling (SPL) format is required. Draft carton and container labeling also needs to be submitted based on proposed revisions.

Recommended response: Submit draft labeling addressing proposed revisions, use the SRPI checklist for formatting, and submit updated content of labeling in SPL format. Provide a highlighted/marked-up copy and a clean Word version. Submit revised carton and container labeling.

Cited: 21 CFR 201.56(a), 21 CFR 201.56(d), 201.57, 21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)

Required Safety Update for Resubmission

Severity: minor

A comprehensive safety update, as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), is required with the resubmission. This includes data from all nonclinical and clinical studies, detailed changes in the safety profile, updated tabulations of adverse events, reasons for premature trial discontinuation, case reports for deaths/serious AEs, updated exposure information, and worldwide safety experience.

Recommended response: Provide a complete safety update in accordance with 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b) as part of the resubmission.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
NDA 505(b)

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
600 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The primary concerns revolve around fundamental manufacturing quality control, raw material specifications, and microbial contamination risk, indicating significant product quality and safety issues. Additionally, the application requires substantial updates to labeling for regulatory compliance and a comprehensive safety update for resubmission.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…