Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 209575 (Jan 1, 2020)

Issued January 1, 2020

Issued

January 1, 2020

Application

Other • 209575

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due December 31, 2020Product may be marketed.

Summary

This document is a Complete Response letter from the FDA to Lannett Holdings, Inc. regarding their New Drug Application (NDA) 209575 for Cocaine Hydrochloride Topical Solution, 4% and 10%. The FDA has determined that the application cannot be approved in its present form due to several deficiencies in clinical, nonclinical, and regulatory aspects, and provides recommendations for addressing these issues.

Key points

  • Submit the results of a thorough QT study to characterize the effects of the product on the QTc interval.
  • Conduct a new leachables study under standard storage conditions, evaluating at least three batches of the to-be-marketed topical cocaine solution products for leachables at multiple timepoints over the course of stability studies (beginning, middle, and end of proposed shelf-life).
  • Evaluate all container closure systems intended for market in the leachables study.
  • Clearly delineate how existing extraction studies were leveraged to inform the leachables assessment.
  • Submit a toxicological assessment justifying the safety of the maximum level achieved over the course of stability for any leachable that exceeds 5 mcg/day, considering the maximum daily dose.
  • Submit a discussion of the extractables-leachables correlation of the findings.
  • Revise the final study reports for Study 16-0l138-G2, 16-0l139-G2, and 16-0l140-G2 to include purity information of the test articles evaluated.
  • Submit revised annotated draft labeling and identify the appropriate source(s) of information upon which reliance is proposed.

Cited reasons

  • Inadequate information to characterize effects on QT interval
  • Inadequate leachables evaluation for container closure system safety
  • Final study reports did not report purity of test articles
  • Inadequate sources for proposed labeling language and 505(b)(2) reliance
  • Requirement for updated content of labeling in SPL format
  • Resubmit proposed proprietary name request
  • Comprehensive safety update required upon resubmission
  • The application cannot be approved in its current form due to significant deficiencies across clinical, nonclinical, and regulatory aspects. Key issues include inadequate characterization of the product's effect on the QT interval, insufficient leachables evaluation for the container closure system, missing purity data for nonclinical test articles, and issues with the justification and sourcing of information for the proposed labeling. A comprehensive safety update is also required upon resubmission.

Recommended actions

  • Submit the results of a thorough QT study to characterize the effects of the product on the QTc interval.
  • Conduct a new leachables study under standard storage conditions, evaluating at least three batches of the to-be-marketed topical cocaine solution products for leachables at multiple timepoints over the course of stability studies (beginning, middle, and end of proposed shelf-life).
  • Evaluate all container closure systems intended for market in the leachables study.
  • Clearly delineate how existing extraction studies were leveraged to inform the leachables assessment.
  • Submit a toxicological assessment justifying the safety of the maximum level achieved over the course of stability for any leachable that exceeds 5 mcg/day, considering the maximum daily dose.
  • Submit a discussion of the extractables-leachables correlation of the findings.
  • Revise the final study reports for Study 16-0l138-G2, 16-0l139-G2, and 16-0l140-G2 to include purity information of the test articles evaluated.
  • Submit revised annotated draft labeling and identify the appropriate source(s) of information upon which reliance is proposed.

Deficiency summary

The application cannot be approved in its current form due to significant deficiencies across clinical, nonclinical, and regulatory aspects. Key issues include inadequate characterization of the product's effect on the QT interval, insufficient leachables evaluation for the container closure system, missing purity data for nonclinical test articles, and issues with the justification and sourcing of information for the proposed labeling. A comprehensive safety update is also required upon resubmission.

Findings

Inadequate information to characterize effects on QT interval

Severity: major

You have not provided adequate information to characterize the effects of your product on the QTc interval.

Recommended response: Submit the results of a thorough QT study.

Inadequate leachables evaluation for container closure system safety

Severity: major

You have not provided adequate leachables evaluation to justify the safety of the proposed container closure system. Specifically, your leachables evaluation did not evaluate at least three batches of your to-be-marketed drug product for leachables and include assessments at multiple timepoints over the course of your stability studies as advised at the Pre-NDA meeting and in accordance with best practices per USP <1664>. Further, you have not provided an adequate extractables-leachables correlation.

Recommended response: Conduct a new leachables study under standard storage conditions that evaluates at least three batches of the to-be-marketed topical cocaine solution products for leachables and include assessments at multiple timepoints over the course of your stability studies. Submit a toxicological assessment justifying the safety of the maximum level achieved over the course of stability for any leachable that exceeds 5 mcg/day. Submit a discussion of the extractables leachables correlation of the findings.

Cited: USP <1664>: Assessment of Drug Product Leachables Associated with Pharmaceutical Packaging/Delivery Systems

Final study reports did not report purity of test articles

Severity: minor

Several of your final study reports did not report the purity of the test articles.

Recommended response: Revise the final study reports for Study 16-0l 138-G2, 16-0l 139-G2, and 16-0l 140-G2 to include purity information of the test articles evaluated.

Inadequate sources for proposed labeling language and 505(b)(2) reliance

Severity: major

Your annotated draft labeling did not adequately identify the appropriate source(s) of information upon which you propose to rely. This includes issues with relying on non-US conclusions, identifying listed drugs, and establishing a 'bridge' for 505(b)(2) reliance.

Recommended response: Identify appropriate sources of information, including published literature or listed drugs in accordance with 21 CFR 314.54. Establish a 'bridge' (e.g., via comparative bioavailability data) between your proposed drug product and each listed drug upon which you propose to rely.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.54

Requirement for updated content of labeling in SPL format

Severity: minor

Your response must include updated content of labeling in structured product labeling (SPL) format.

Recommended response: Review labeling review resources and the SRPI checklist. Ensure updated content of labeling is provided in structured product labeling (SPL) format as described at http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/DataStandards/StructuredProductLabeling/default.htm.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)

Resubmit proposed proprietary name request

Severity: info

The proposed proprietary name, NUMBRINO, was found acceptable pending approval of the application. Please resubmit the proposed proprietary name request when you respond to the application deficiencies.

Recommended response: Resubmit the proposed proprietary name request with the complete response to the application deficiencies.

Comprehensive safety update required upon resubmission

Severity: major

A comprehensive safety update, as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), is required upon resubmission. This includes detailing significant changes, new safety data, tabulations, case reports, updated exposure information, and worldwide experience.

Recommended response: Prepare a detailed safety update including all new nonclinical and clinical study data, changes in safety profile, tabulations of adverse events, case report forms for deaths or serious adverse events, updated exposure information, and a summary of worldwide experience and foreign labeling.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

Impact

Impact score
0.75
Estimated delay
365 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The application received a Complete Response Letter due to critical data gaps in clinical safety (QT interval), product quality (container closure leachables), and nonclinical study reporting. Additionally, regulatory compliance for labeling and the 505(b)(2) reliance pathway requires further justification and a comprehensive safety update is mandated for resubmission.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 25%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…