Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 210063 (Jan 1, 2019)

Issued January 1, 2019

Issued

January 1, 2019

Application

Other • 210063

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due January 1, 2020Product may be marketed.

Summary

This document is a Complete Response letter from the FDA to Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. regarding their New Drug Application (NDA) 210063 for Fulvestrant Injection, 250 mg/5 mL. The FDA has determined that the application cannot be approved in its present form due to various deficiencies in nonclinical data, product quality, combination product (device) requirements, and labeling.

Key points

  • Provide an adequate justification for the safety of the proposed levels of medium chain triglycerides (MCT) in the drug product administered by intramuscular injection.
  • Submit a final report from a GLP nonclinical bridging toxicology study in a single species comparing Fulvestrant Injection formulation to the listed drug product (Faslodex) at a clinically relevant dose, including assessment of local tissue effects and toxicokinetics following repeated intramuscular injections.
  • Provide long term leachability data, including the safety evaluation report of the leachable from the syringe components, to cover the shelf life period, or include data from accelerated leachable studies.
  • Adopt specifications for tensile and elongation of the plunger rod covering the shelf life as a part of quality control.
  • Provide extractables/leachables study reports with data.
  • Include design requirements and/or specifications for the prefilled syringe within the NDA, covering essential performance requirements such as expelled volume (accuracy), breakloose force, and glide.
  • Submit a letter of authorization (LOA) to review information within the 510(k) (K951254) to support the NDA.
  • Include a clinical use study in the 510(k) for the sharps injury prevention feature, or provide documentation of a clinical use study per FDA guidance 'Medical devices with Sharps Injury Prevention Features' if the 510(k) does not provide one.

Cited reasons

  • Inadequate justification for excipient safety (MCT)
  • Missing long-term leachability data for syringe components
  • Missing specification for plunger rod tensile and elongation
  • Missing extractables/leachables study reports
  • Incomplete design requirements/specifications for prefilled syringe
  • Missing Letter of Authorization (LOA) for referenced 510(k)
  • Inadequate clinical use study for sharps injury prevention feature
  • Incomplete biocompatibility evaluation for needle component

Recommended actions

  • Provide an adequate justification for the safety of the proposed levels of medium chain triglycerides (MCT) in the drug product administered by intramuscular injection.
  • Submit a final report from a GLP nonclinical bridging toxicology study in a single species comparing Fulvestrant Injection formulation to the listed drug product (Faslodex) at a clinically relevant dose, including assessment of local tissue effects and toxicokinetics following repeated intramuscular injections.
  • Provide long term leachability data, including the safety evaluation report of the leachable from the syringe components, to cover the shelf life period, or include data from accelerated leachable studies.
  • Adopt specifications for tensile and elongation of the plunger rod covering the shelf life as a part of quality control.
  • Provide extractables/leachables study reports with data.
  • Include design requirements and/or specifications for the prefilled syringe within the NDA, covering essential performance requirements such as expelled volume (accuracy), breakloose force, and glide.
  • Submit a letter of authorization (LOA) to review information within the 510(k) (K951254) to support the NDA.
  • Include a clinical use study in the 510(k) for the sharps injury prevention feature, or provide documentation of a clinical use study per FDA guidance 'Medical devices with Sharps Injury Prevention Features' if the 510(k) does not provide one.

Deficiency summary

The application for Fulvestrant Injection, 250 mg/5 mL, was not approved due to inadequate justification for the safety of an excipient (MCT) in nonclinical studies, lack of long-term leachability data for syringe components, missing study reports for extractables/leachables, and several deficiencies related to the prefilled syringe device component, including lack of design requirements, missing performance specifications, and an incomplete risk assessment. Labeling comments were reserved pending resolution of other issues.

Findings

Inadequate justification for excipient safety (MCT)

Severity: major

The safety of the proposed levels of medium chain triglycerides (MCT) excipient in the drug product to be administered by intramuscular injection was not adequately justified. The potential impact of this excipient on local tissue toxicities as it compares to the listed drug was not adequately addressed. MCT were not listed as a component of the vehicle or in the Certificate of Analysis in the reports for the rat and rabbit toxicology studies, and their levels and fatty acid composition were not provided, rendering these studies inadequate.

Recommended response: Provide an adequate justification for the safety of the proposed levels of MCT in your drug product administered by intramuscular injection. Submit a final report from a GLP nonclinical bridging toxicology study in a single species comparing your Fulvestrant Injection formulation to the listed drug product (Faslodex) at a clinically relevant dose, including assessment of local tissue effects and toxicokinetics.

Missing long-term leachability data for syringe components

Severity: major

Long-term leachability data, including the safety evaluation report of the leachable from the syringe components, is required to cover the shelf life period. Alternatively, data from accelerated leachable studies may be included.

Recommended response: Provide long term leachability data including the safety evaluation report of the leachable from the syringe components to cover the shelf life period, or include data from accelerated leachable studies.

Missing specification for plunger rod tensile and elongation

Severity: minor

Adopt specifications for tensile and elongation of the plunger rod covering the shelf life as a part of quality control.

Recommended response: Adopt specification for tensile and elongation of the plunger rod covering the shelf life as a part of quality control.

Missing extractables/leachables study reports

Severity: major

The extractables/leachables study protocol was provided, but the study reports with data are missing.

Recommended response: Provide the extractables/leachables study reports with data.

Incomplete design requirements/specifications for prefilled syringe

Severity: major

The NDA does not include any design requirements and/or specifications for your prefilled syringe. Essential performance requirements, including expelled volume (accuracy), breakloose force, and glide force, should be included within the NDA.

Recommended response: Include essential performance requirements and specifications for the prefilled syringe, such as expelled volume (accuracy), breakloose force, and glide force, within the NDA.

Missing Letter of Authorization (LOA) for referenced 510(k)

Severity: minor

To review the information within the referenced 510(k) (K951254) for verification testing, a Letter of Authorization (LOA) needs to be submitted.

Recommended response: Submit a letter of authorization (LOA) to review the information within the 510(k) (K951254) to support the NDA.

Inadequate clinical use study for sharps injury prevention feature

Severity: major

The 510(k) should include a clinical use study that mimics actual clinical use by patient substitutes to evaluate the sharps injury prevention feature. If the 510(k) does not provide such a study, documentation of a clinical use study per FDA guidance is required, recommending a sample size of 500 with zero failures.

Recommended response: If the 510(k) does not provide a simulated use study, provide documentation of a clinical use study per FDA guidance document 'Medical devices with Sharps Injury Prevention Features,' dated August 9, 2005.

Incomplete biocompatibility evaluation for needle component

Severity: major

The 510(k) should include a biocompatibility evaluation of the final finished needle component of the pre-filled syringe per ISO 10993-1 guidance. Recommended endpoints for systemic contact include cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, acute systemic toxicity, hemolysis, and material-mediated pyrogenicity.

Recommended response: Ensure the 510(k) includes a biocompatibility evaluation of the final finished needle component per ISO 10993-1, addressing the recommended endpoints based on the type and duration of contact.

Missing breakloose and glide force in release specifications

Severity: minor

The release specifications submitted under section 3.2.P.5.1 do not include the breakloose and glide force. These specifications should be included in the release testing for the combination product.

Recommended response: Update your release specifications to include the breakloose and glide force.

Missing stability data for device essential performance requirements

Severity: major

Stability testing does not include the testing of the essential performance requirements of the device constituent of the combination product. Stability data supporting the proposed shelf-life, including expelled volume (dose accuracy), breakloose, and glide force, is required.

Recommended response: Provide stability data supporting the proposed shelf-life of the combination product, including testing of the expelled volume (i.e., dose accuracy), breakloose, and glide force of the combination product.

Missing risk assessment for combination product

Severity: critical

The Agency was unable to locate a risk assessment of the combination product. A risk analysis characterizing and evaluating the risks to the user or patient during normal use, reasonably foreseeable misuse, and potential system failure states, including planned mitigations and acceptability of remaining risks, is needed.

Recommended response: Provide the risk analysis information which characterizes and evaluates the risks to the user or patient both during normal use, reasonable foreseeable misuse, and potential system failure states, including planned mitigations, verification of risk mitigations, as well as the acceptability of remaining risks.

Missing material description for combination product components

Severity: major

A description of materials, including the material composition (trade name and common name), material supplier, and whether the material is drug and/or patient contacting, was not provided. This should include any additives, processing agents, colorants, etc.

Recommended response: Provide a description of materials including the material composition (trade name and common name), material supplier, and whether the material is drug and/or patient contacting, including any additives, processing agents, colorants, etc.

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
365 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The application received a Complete Response due to significant deficiencies across nonclinical safety (excipient justification), product quality (leachables/extractables, specifications), and particularly the combination product's device component, which lacked adequate design requirements, performance testing, stability data, and a comprehensive risk assessment. Labeling review is pending resolution of these core issues.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…