Insufficient Comparative Dose Accuracy Data
Severity: majorInformation and data of comparative dose accuracy testing between the proposed product and the relied-upon listed drug are lacking, specifically concerning complete dose delivered of glucagon without submicron particle formation events prior to administration as provided in the labeling.
Recommended response: Conduct comparative dose accuracy testing using glucagon content assay and dynamic light scattering analysis to assess submicron particles, as described in the letter.
Inadequate IV Administration Compatibility and Stability Data
Severity: majorThe data provided do not support the compatibility and stability of the proposed IV administration for the Gvoke vial formulation. Compatibility studies were provided for the XP-9164 formulation (under IND 156281) but not for the currently proposed Gvoke vial formulation.
Recommended response: Provide admixture studies using the proposed Gvoke vial formulation to inform drug product compatibility and stability for the proposed dosing and administration technique, including comparative gelling and agglomeration studies.
Comprehensive Safety Update Required
Severity: majorA safety update is required as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b). This includes detailing significant changes or findings in the safety profile, presenting new safety data from studies/clinical trials, providing comparative tables of adverse event frequencies, submitting case report forms and narrative summaries for deaths or discontinuations due to adverse events, updating exposure information, summarizing worldwide safety experience, and providing English translations of current approved foreign labeling.
Recommended response: Submit a complete safety update addressing all specified requirements, including new clinical data, comparative analyses, case reports, exposure data, and worldwide experience.
Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)
Proprietary Name Resubmission Pending Approval
Severity: minorThe proposed proprietary name, Gvoke VialDx, was found conditionally acceptable pending approval of the application. It must be resubmitted when all application deficiencies identified in this letter have been addressed.
Recommended response: Resubmit the proposed proprietary name along with the complete response to all other deficiencies.