Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 213135 (Jan 1, 2020)

Issued January 1, 2020

Issued

January 1, 2020

Application

Other • 213135

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due December 31, 2020Product may be marketed.

Summary

This document is a Complete Response Letter from the FDA to Braintree Laboratories, Inc. regarding their New Drug Application (NDA) 213135 for SUTAB (sodium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, and potassium chloride) tablets. The FDA has determined that the application cannot be approved in its present form due to product quality/facility inspection deficiencies, and provides recommendations for addressing these issues, including requirements for labeling, proprietary name resubmission, and a comprehensive safety update.

Key points

  • Satisfactorily resolve product quality and facility inspection deficiencies identified at the Braintree Laboratories, Inc., MA manufacturing facility.
  • Review labeling review resources on PLR Requirements for Prescribing Information and Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule websites, including regulations, guidance documents, and the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI) checklist.
  • If labeling is revised, use the SRPI checklist to ensure conformity with format items in regulations and guidances.
  • Submit updated content of labeling [21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)] in structured product labeling (SPL) format.
  • Submit draft carton and container labeling based on previous submissions.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name, SUTAB, when responding to application deficiencies.
  • Include a safety update as described in 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b) when responding to deficiencies.
  • Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile within the safety update.

Cited reasons

  • Unresolved Manufacturing Facility Deficiencies
  • Inadequate Prescribing Information and SPL Format
  • Submission of Draft Carton and Container Labeling
  • Resubmission of Proprietary Name
  • Comprehensive Safety Update Required
  • The New Drug Application for SUTAB tablets cannot be approved in its present form due to unresolved manufacturing facility deficiencies, inadequate prescribing information and SPL format, outstanding carton and container labeling, the need for proprietary name resubmission, and an incomplete safety update requiring extensive data and specific presentation formats.

Recommended actions

  • Satisfactorily resolve product quality and facility inspection deficiencies identified at the Braintree Laboratories, Inc., MA manufacturing facility.
  • Review labeling review resources on PLR Requirements for Prescribing Information and Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule websites, including regulations, guidance documents, and the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI) checklist.
  • If labeling is revised, use the SRPI checklist to ensure conformity with format items in regulations and guidances.
  • Submit updated content of labeling [21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)] in structured product labeling (SPL) format.
  • Submit draft carton and container labeling based on previous submissions.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name, SUTAB, when responding to application deficiencies.
  • Include a safety update as described in 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b) when responding to deficiencies.
  • Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile within the safety update.

Deficiency summary

The New Drug Application for SUTAB tablets cannot be approved in its present form due to unresolved manufacturing facility deficiencies, inadequate prescribing information and SPL format, outstanding carton and container labeling, the need for proprietary name resubmission, and an incomplete safety update requiring extensive data and specific presentation formats.

Findings

Unresolved Manufacturing Facility Deficiencies

Severity: critical

During a recent inspection of the Braintree Laboratories, Inc. manufacturing facility, field investigators conveyed deficiencies. Satisfactory resolution of these deficiencies is required before this NDA may be approved.

Recommended response: Address and resolve all deficiencies identified during the manufacturing facility inspection to ensure compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP).

Inadequate Prescribing Information and SPL Format

Severity: major

The proposed labeling is not yet adequate. If revised, it must conform with format items in regulations and guidances, and the response must include updated content of labeling in structured product labeling (SPL) format.

Recommended response: Review and revise prescribing information to ensure compliance with PLR requirements, Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule, and SRPI checklist. Submit updated content in SPL format.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)

Submission of Draft Carton and Container Labeling

Severity: minor

Submit draft carton and container labeling based on previously submitted display panels (March 3, 2020) and the kit carton layout (March 11, 2020).

Recommended response: Prepare and submit draft carton and container labeling as requested, incorporating previous submissions.

Resubmission of Proprietary Name

Severity: minor

The proposed proprietary name, SUTAB, was found acceptable pending approval of the application. It needs to be resubmitted when responding to the application deficiencies.

Recommended response: Resubmit the proposed proprietary name, SUTAB, with the complete response.

Comprehensive Safety Update Required

Severity: major

A comprehensive safety update is required as described in 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b). This includes detailed changes in safety profile, incorporation of new safety data (tabulated with original data and comparative tables), separate tables for other indications, retabulation of premature trial discontinuations, case report forms and narrative summaries for deaths/serious adverse events, information on changes in common adverse events, updated exposure information, worldwide safety experience summary, and English translations of foreign labeling.

Recommended response: Compile and submit a comprehensive safety update addressing all specified data requirements, including new data, comparative analyses, case reports, and worldwide experience, formatted as requested.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
505(b)(2)

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
665 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The application received a Complete Response Letter primarily due to critical manufacturing facility deficiencies and significant outstanding issues related to the comprehensive safety data update. Additional administrative and labeling updates are also required.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…