Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 214520 (Jan 1, 2023)

Issued January 1, 2023

Issued

January 1, 2023

Application

Other • 214520

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due January 1, 2024Product may be marketed.

Summary

The FDA issued a Complete Response Letter for CorMedix Inc.'s New Drug Application (NDA) 214520 for taurolidine/heparin catheter lock solution. The application cannot be approved in its current form due to deficiencies related to product quality/facility inspections, prescribing information, carton/container labeling, and the proposed proprietary name. The letter outlines specific requirements and recommendations for addressing these issues in a resubmission.

Key points

  • Resolve deficiencies identified during inspections of manufacturing facilities (e.g., Rovi Pharma Industrial Services S.A.).
  • Submit draft labeling responsive to a separate FDA communication upon resubmission.
  • Correct formatting errors in labeling using the SRPI checklist.
  • Submit updated content of labeling in Structured Product Labeling (SPL) format as described at FDA.gov (21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)).
  • Provide highlighted or marked-up and clean Word versions of labeling with annotations.
  • Ensure proposed Prescribing Information (PI) conforms to 21 CFR 201.56(a), (d) and 201.57.
  • Submit draft carton and container labeling responsive to a separate FDA communication upon resubmission.
  • Submit a new request for proprietary name review for an alternate name, or indicate 'Defencath' remains the preferred name.

Cited reasons

  • Manufacturing Facility Deficiencies
  • Draft Prescribing Information Issues
  • Draft Carton and Container Labeling Issues
  • Unacceptable Proprietary Name
  • The application cannot be approved in its present form due to unresolved manufacturing facility deficiencies, significant issues with draft prescribing information and carton/container labeling requiring further agency communication, and an unacceptable proposed proprietary name due to potential confusion with another product.

Recommended actions

  • Resolve deficiencies identified during inspections of manufacturing facilities (e.g., Rovi Pharma Industrial Services S.A.).
  • Submit draft labeling responsive to a separate FDA communication upon resubmission.
  • Correct formatting errors in labeling using the SRPI checklist.
  • Submit updated content of labeling in Structured Product Labeling (SPL) format as described at FDA.gov (21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)).
  • Provide highlighted or marked-up and clean Word versions of labeling with annotations.
  • Ensure proposed Prescribing Information (PI) conforms to 21 CFR 201.56(a), (d) and 201.57.
  • Submit draft carton and container labeling responsive to a separate FDA communication upon resubmission.
  • Submit a new request for proprietary name review for an alternate name, or indicate 'Defencath' remains the preferred name.

Deficiency summary

The application cannot be approved in its present form due to unresolved manufacturing facility deficiencies, significant issues with draft prescribing information and carton/container labeling requiring further agency communication, and an unacceptable proposed proprietary name due to potential confusion with another product.

Findings

Manufacturing Facility Deficiencies

Severity: critical

During a recent inspection of manufacturing facilities (including Rovi Pharma Industrial Services S.A.), field investigators conveyed deficiencies or noted objectionable conditions during a records review. Satisfactory resolution of these deficiencies/conditions is required before approval.

Recommended response: Address all deficiencies identified during the facility inspection and ensure satisfactory resolution. This may involve corrective actions, re-inspections, or providing adequate responses to the agency's findings.

Draft Prescribing Information Issues

Severity: major

Draft labeling will be provided in a separate communication. Upon resubmission, submit draft labeling responsive to that communication, ensuring conformance with the SRPI checklist, regulations (21 CFR 201.56(a), 201.57), and guidances. Submit updated content of labeling (21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)) in Structured Product Labeling (SPL) format, with marked-up and clean Word versions.

Recommended response: Await separate communication for draft labeling. Revise proposed Prescribing Information to comply with all content and format regulations and guidances, using the SRPI checklist. Submit updated content in SPL format with marked-up and clean versions.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i), 21 CFR 201.56(a), 21 CFR 201.57

Draft Carton and Container Labeling Issues

Severity: major

Draft carton and container labeling will be provided in a separate communication. Upon resubmission, submit draft labeling responsive to that communication.

Recommended response: Await separate communication for draft carton and container labeling. Revise and submit responsive labeling upon resubmission.

Unacceptable Proprietary Name

Severity: major

The proposed proprietary name, Defencath, is unacceptable due to potential confusion with another product currently under review. Its ultimate acceptability is dependent upon which application is approved first. A new request for proprietary name review is needed for any alternate proposed names.

Recommended response: Submit a new request for proprietary name review for any alternate name. If Defencath is still preferred, indicate this in the cover letter, understanding its acceptability is contingent on prior approval of the other product.

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
NDA 505(b)

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
545 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The application received a Complete Response due to critical manufacturing facility issues, significant deficiencies in both prescribing information and carton/container labeling requiring further agency communication, and an unacceptable proposed proprietary name due to potential confusion with another product.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…