Manufacturing Facility Deficiencies
Severity: criticalDuring a recent inspection of manufacturing facilities (including Rovi Pharma Industrial Services S.A.), field investigators conveyed deficiencies or noted objectionable conditions during a records review. Satisfactory resolution of these deficiencies/conditions is required before approval.
Recommended response: Address all deficiencies identified during the facility inspection and ensure satisfactory resolution. This may involve corrective actions, re-inspections, or providing adequate responses to the agency's findings.
Draft Prescribing Information Issues
Severity: majorDraft labeling will be provided in a separate communication. Upon resubmission, submit draft labeling responsive to that communication, ensuring conformance with the SRPI checklist, regulations (21 CFR 201.56(a), 201.57), and guidances. Submit updated content of labeling (21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)) in Structured Product Labeling (SPL) format, with marked-up and clean Word versions.
Recommended response: Await separate communication for draft labeling. Revise proposed Prescribing Information to comply with all content and format regulations and guidances, using the SRPI checklist. Submit updated content in SPL format with marked-up and clean versions.
Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i), 21 CFR 201.56(a), 21 CFR 201.57
Draft Carton and Container Labeling Issues
Severity: majorDraft carton and container labeling will be provided in a separate communication. Upon resubmission, submit draft labeling responsive to that communication.
Recommended response: Await separate communication for draft carton and container labeling. Revise and submit responsive labeling upon resubmission.
Unacceptable Proprietary Name
Severity: majorThe proposed proprietary name, Defencath, is unacceptable due to potential confusion with another product currently under review. Its ultimate acceptability is dependent upon which application is approved first. A new request for proprietary name review is needed for any alternate proposed names.
Recommended response: Submit a new request for proprietary name review for any alternate name. If Defencath is still preferred, indicate this in the cover letter, understanding its acceptability is contingent on prior approval of the other product.