Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 217202 (Jan 1, 2024)

Issued January 1, 2024

Issued

January 1, 2024

Application

Other • 217202

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due December 31, 2024Product may be marketed.

Summary

The FDA issued a Complete Response letter for NDA 217202 for landiolol injection, indicating that the application cannot be approved in its current form due to deficiencies related to product quality, manufacturing, prescribing information, proprietary name, and safety updates. The letter also outlines a postmarketing requirement to assess drug transporter inhibition.

Key points

  • Address deficiencies related to product quality and manufacturing.
  • Correct formatting errors in the draft labeling using the SRPI checklist.
  • Submit updated content of labeling in structured product labeling (SPL) format.
  • Provide a highlighted/marked-up copy and a clean Word version of the labeling, with annotations for changes.
  • Ensure proposed Prescribing Information (PI) conforms to 21 CFR 201.56(a) and (d) and 201.57.
  • Submit a new proposed proprietary name if desired, as the previous one was unacceptable.
  • Include a safety update as described in 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b) when responding to deficiencies.
  • Describe significant changes or findings in the safety profile in the safety update.

Cited reasons

  • Unspecified Manufacturing Deficiencies
  • Prescribing Information Formatting and Content Deficiencies
  • Unacceptable Proprietary Name
  • Required Comprehensive Safety Update
  • Unaddressed Drug Transporter Inhibition Potential (PMR)
  • The application for landiolol injection cannot be approved in its current form due to unspecified manufacturing deficiencies, significant issues with the formatting and content of the prescribing information, an unacceptable proprietary name, and the lack of an in vitro assessment for drug transporter inhibition potential, which is required as a postmarketing commitment. A comprehensive safety update is also required upon resubmission.

Recommended actions

  • Address deficiencies related to product quality and manufacturing.
  • Correct formatting errors in the draft labeling using the SRPI checklist.
  • Submit updated content of labeling in structured product labeling (SPL) format.
  • Provide a highlighted/marked-up copy and a clean Word version of the labeling, with annotations for changes.
  • Ensure proposed Prescribing Information (PI) conforms to 21 CFR 201.56(a) and (d) and 201.57.
  • Submit a new proposed proprietary name if desired, as the previous one was unacceptable.
  • Include a safety update as described in 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b) when responding to deficiencies.
  • Describe significant changes or findings in the safety profile in the safety update.

Deficiency summary

The application for landiolol injection cannot be approved in its current form due to unspecified manufacturing deficiencies, significant issues with the formatting and content of the prescribing information, an unacceptable proprietary name, and the lack of an in vitro assessment for drug transporter inhibition potential, which is required as a postmarketing commitment. A comprehensive safety update is also required upon resubmission.

Findings

Unspecified Manufacturing Deficiencies

Severity: major

The letter indicates issues under 'PRODUCT QUALITY Drug Product Manufacturing' but does not provide specific details within this complete response letter. It implies that manufacturing issues contribute to the non-approvability of the application.

Recommended response: Address all outstanding manufacturing-related deficiencies, potentially referencing previous communications or requesting clarification from the agency.

Prescribing Information Formatting and Content Deficiencies

Severity: major

The submitted draft labeling contains formatting errors and does not conform to the SRPI checklist. Updated content of labeling must be submitted in Structured Product Labeling (SPL) format. The proposed Prescribing Information (PI) does not conform to content and format regulations found at 21 CFR 201.56(a) and (d) and 201.57.

Recommended response: Revise the Prescribing Information to comply with SRPI checklist, 21 CFR 201.56(a), (d), 201.57, and 21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i). Submit in SPL format with marked-up and clean versions.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i), 21 CFR 201.56(a), 21 CFR 201.56(d), 21 CFR 201.57

Unacceptable Proprietary Name

Severity: major

The proposed proprietary name for landiolol injection was previously deemed unacceptable. A new proposed proprietary name must be submitted upon resubmission if the sponsor wishes to have one for the product.

Recommended response: Propose and submit a new proprietary name that meets FDA's naming conventions and guidelines.

Required Comprehensive Safety Update

Severity: major

A comprehensive safety update is required upon resubmission, as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b). This update must include data from all nonclinical and clinical studies/trials, detailed changes in the safety profile, updated adverse event tabulations, case report forms for deaths/serious adverse events, updated exposure information, and worldwide safety experience.

Recommended response: Compile and submit a complete safety update as per 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), ensuring all specified data points and formats are included.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)

Unaddressed Drug Transporter Inhibition Potential (PMR)

Severity: critical

The application lacks investigation into the inhibitory effect of landiolol and its M1 metabolite on multiple drug transporters (P-glycoprotein, BCRP, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OCT2, MATE1, MATE2-K, OAT1, and OAT3). FDA has determined that an in vitro assessment of this potential is required as a postmarketing requirement under section 505(o)(3) of the FDCA.

Recommended response: Conduct the required in vitro assessment of landiolol and M1 metabolite's drug transporter inhibition potential and submit the results as part of the resubmission or as a commitment for post-approval.

Cited: Section 505(o)(3) of the FDCA

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
365 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The application received a Complete Response Letter primarily due to deficiencies in product quality (manufacturing), significant issues with labeling content and format, an unacceptable proprietary name, and a critical gap in drug interaction assessment requiring a postmarketing commitment. A comprehensive safety update is also mandated for resubmission.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…