Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 761091 (Jan 1, 2018)

Issued January 1, 2018

Issued

January 1, 2018

Application

Other • 761091

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due January 1, 2019Product may be marketed.

Summary

This document is a Complete Response letter from the FDA to CELLTRION, Inc. regarding their Biologics License Application (BLA) for CT-P6. The FDA has determined that the application cannot be approved in its present form due to deficiencies related to facility inspections, product quality, and the need for an updated safety profile.

Key points

  • Satisfactorily resolve deficiencies identified during the inspection of the Celltrion, Inc. manufacturing facility.
  • Adjust the Drug Product (DP) release specification of mg/ml to ensure that the recoverable protein content at the lower limit of the acceptance criterion will consistently meet the label claim of 420 mg.
  • Ensure the CT-P6 DP manufacturing process and controls are set to ensure the appropriate deliverable volume and protein concentration after reconstitution in each DP vial to meet the label claim.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name (Herzuma) when responding to the application deficiencies.
  • Include a safety update with data from all nonclinical and clinical studies, describing significant changes or findings in the safety profile.
  • Present new safety data from clinical studies for the proposed indication using the same format as the original BLA submission.
  • Present tabulations of new safety data combined with original BLA data.
  • Include tables comparing frequencies of adverse events in the original BLA with retabulated frequencies.

Cited reasons

  • Unresolved Manufacturing Facility Inspection Deficiencies
  • Product Quality - Insufficient Deliverable Volume and Protein Concentration
  • Product Quality - Insufficient Data for Overfill Volume Justification
  • Proprietary Name Resubmission Required
  • Comprehensive Safety Update Required
  • Describe Significant Safety Profile Changes
  • Incorporate and Present New Safety Data
  • Retabulate Reasons for Premature Study Discontinuation

Recommended actions

  • Satisfactorily resolve deficiencies identified during the inspection of the Celltrion, Inc. manufacturing facility.
  • Adjust the Drug Product (DP) release specification of mg/ml to ensure that the recoverable protein content at the lower limit of the acceptance criterion will consistently meet the label claim of 420 mg.
  • Ensure the CT-P6 DP manufacturing process and controls are set to ensure the appropriate deliverable volume and protein concentration after reconstitution in each DP vial to meet the label claim.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name (Herzuma) when responding to the application deficiencies.
  • Include a safety update with data from all nonclinical and clinical studies, describing significant changes or findings in the safety profile.
  • Present new safety data from clinical studies for the proposed indication using the same format as the original BLA submission.
  • Present tabulations of new safety data combined with original BLA data.
  • Include tables comparing frequencies of adverse events in the original BLA with retabulated frequencies.

Deficiency summary

The application cannot be approved in its present form due to unresolved manufacturing facility inspection deficiencies, product quality issues related to deliverable volume and protein concentration, and a need for a comprehensive safety update including detailed clinical study data, worldwide experience, and updated labeling.

Findings

Unresolved Manufacturing Facility Inspection Deficiencies

Severity: critical

During a recent inspection of the Celltrion, Inc. (FEI 3005241015) manufacturing facility, the field investigator conveyed deficiencies to the representative of the facility. Satisfactory resolution of the deficiencies is required before this BLA may be approved.

Recommended response: Address all outstanding observations from the manufacturing facility inspection and provide evidence of satisfactory resolution.

Product Quality - Insufficient Deliverable Volume and Protein Concentration

Severity: major

Per the “Guidance for Industry: Allowable Excess Volume and Labeled Vial Fill Size in Injectable Drug and Biological Products”, the product should be designed to meet the label claim and acceptable overfill, and allow for correct dosing. Adjust the Drug Product (DP) release specification of mg/ml to ensure that the recoverable protein content at the lower limit of the acceptance criterion will consistently meet the label claim of 420 mg.

Recommended response: Revise DP release specifications and provide data demonstrating consistent deliverable volume and protein concentration to meet label claim, referencing the FDA guidance on allowable excess volume.

Product Quality - Insufficient Data for Overfill Volume Justification

Severity: major

To support the licensure of CT-P6 420 mg/vial, the CT-P6 DP manufacturing process and controls should be set to ensure the appropriate deliverable volume and protein concentration after reconstitution in each DP vial to meet the label claim. Insufficient information and data on the approach and method used to derive the overfill volume.

Recommended response: Provide comprehensive data and justification for the derived overfill volume to ensure consistent deliverable volume and protein concentration.

Proprietary Name Resubmission Required

Severity: info

Please refer to correspondence dated February 14, 2018, which addresses the proposed proprietary name, Herzuma. This name was found acceptable pending approval of the application in the current review cycle. Please resubmit the proposed proprietary name when you respond to the application deficiencies.

Recommended response: Resubmit the proposed proprietary name 'Herzuma' with the complete response.

Comprehensive Safety Update Required

Severity: major

When you respond to the above deficiencies, include a safety update. The safety update should include data from all nonclinical and clinical studies of the product under consideration regardless of indication, dosage form, or dose level.

Recommended response: Prepare a comprehensive safety update incorporating all nonclinical and clinical study data, regardless of indication or dosage, as part of the complete response.

Describe Significant Safety Profile Changes

Severity: major

Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile and their relevance, if any, to whether there may be clinically meaningful differences between the proposed biosimilar product and the U.S.-licensed reference product.

Recommended response: Analyze and describe any significant changes in the safety profile, specifically addressing potential clinically meaningful differences from the reference product.

Incorporate and Present New Safety Data

Severity: major

When assembling the sections describing discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, and common adverse events, incorporate new safety data as follows: Present new safety data from the clinical studies for the proposed indication using the same format as the original BLA submission. Present tabulations of the new safety data combined with the original BLA data. Include tables that compare frequencies of adverse events in the original BLA with the retabulated frequencies described in the bullet above.

Recommended response: Integrate and present new safety data from clinical studies, including discontinuations and adverse events, in a consistent format, combining with original BLA data and providing comparative tables.

Retabulate Reasons for Premature Study Discontinuation

Severity: major

Present a retabulation of the reasons for premature study discontinuation by incorporating the drop-outs from the newly completed studies. Describe any new trends or patterns identified.

Recommended response: Retabulate and analyze reasons for premature study discontinuations, including new study data, and identify any emerging trends.

Provide Case Report Forms and Narrative Summaries for Deaths/Serious AEs

Severity: major

Provide case report forms and narrative summaries for each patient who died during a clinical study or who did not complete a study because of an adverse event. In addition, provide narrative summaries for serious adverse events.

Recommended response: Submit all requested case report forms and narrative summaries for patient deaths and serious adverse events.

Describe Changes in Common Adverse Events

Severity: major

Describe any information that suggests a substantial change in the incidence of common, but less serious, adverse events between the new data and the original BLA data.

Recommended response: Analyze and describe any substantial changes in the incidence of common adverse events between new and original BLA data.

Provide Updated Clinical Exposure Information

Severity: major

Provide updated exposure information for the clinical studies (e.g., number of subjects, person time).

Recommended response: Submit updated clinical study exposure information, including subject numbers and person-time data.

Summary of Worldwide Safety Experience

Severity: major

Provide a summary of worldwide experience on the safety of this product, including adverse events known to be associated with the use of the product and immunogenicity. Include an updated estimate of use for this product marketed in other countries.

Recommended response: Compile and submit a comprehensive summary of worldwide safety experience, including adverse events, immunogenicity, and updated usage estimates from other countries.

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
351(k) BLA

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
270 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The application requires significant updates across manufacturing quality systems, product quality specifications, and a comprehensive re-evaluation and presentation of safety data from both clinical studies and worldwide experience, in addition to resolving facility inspection findings, before it can be approved.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…