Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 761166 (Jan 1, 2021)

Issued January 1, 2021

Issued

January 1, 2021

Application

Other • 761166

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due January 1, 2022Product may be marketed.

Summary

This is a Complete Response Letter from the FDA to PharmaEssentia Corporation regarding Biologics License Application (BLA) 761166 for P1101, indicating that the application cannot be approved in its current form due to several deficiencies.

Key points

  • Implement Human Factors (HF) protocol recommendations stated in the HF validation study protocol advice letter dated February 26, 2021.
  • Consider additional design modifications and labeling changes for the product.
  • Submit the results of another HF validation study to demonstrate safe and effective product use.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name (Besremi) when responding to the application deficiencies.
  • Ensure required FDA facility inspections of PharmaEssentia Corporation (FEI 2000012832 and FEI 3005182038) are conducted and findings assessed before application approval.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d) when responding to deficiencies.
  • Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile within the safety update.
  • Present new safety data from studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication using the same format as the original submission.

Cited reasons

  • Inadequate Human Factors Validation Study
  • Required Facility Inspections Not Conducted
  • Comprehensive Safety Update Required
  • Proprietary Name Resubmission
  • Bioburden and Sterility Test Method Suitability Data
  • The application cannot be approved in its present form due to an inadequate human factors validation study, uncompleted facility inspections, and the need for a comprehensive safety update. Additional recommendations were provided for proprietary name resubmission and test method suitability.

Recommended actions

  • Implement Human Factors (HF) protocol recommendations stated in the HF validation study protocol advice letter dated February 26, 2021.
  • Consider additional design modifications and labeling changes for the product.
  • Submit the results of another HF validation study to demonstrate safe and effective product use.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name (Besremi) when responding to the application deficiencies.
  • Ensure required FDA facility inspections of PharmaEssentia Corporation (FEI 2000012832 and FEI 3005182038) are conducted and findings assessed before application approval.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d) when responding to deficiencies.
  • Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile within the safety update.
  • Present new safety data from studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication using the same format as the original submission.

Deficiency summary

The application cannot be approved in its present form due to an inadequate human factors validation study, uncompleted facility inspections, and the need for a comprehensive safety update. Additional recommendations were provided for proprietary name resubmission and test method suitability.

Findings

Inadequate Human Factors Validation Study

Severity: critical

Based on the results of the human factors (HF) validation study data, root cause analysis, and participants’ subjective feedback, the proposed product design and user interface do not support safe and effective use of the product. The agency previously communicated concerns regarding the HF study results report.

Recommended response: Implement HF protocol recommendations stated in the HF validation study protocol advice letter dated February 26, 2021, consider additional design modifications and labeling changes, and submit the results of another HF validation study to demonstrate safe and effective use.

Required Facility Inspections Not Conducted

Severity: critical

Inspections of PharmaEssentia Corporation facilities (FEI 2000012832, Taichung, Taiwan and FEI 3005182038, Taipei, Taiwan) are required to assess compliance with CGMP before the application can be approved. Due to travel restrictions, these inspections could not be conducted during the current review cycle.

Recommended response: Address other deficiencies while awaiting the FDA's ability to conduct required facility inspections once travel restrictions are lifted and based on public health need.

Comprehensive Safety Update Required

Severity: major

A comprehensive safety update is required as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d). This update must include data from all nonclinical and clinical studies/trials, describe significant changes in the safety profile, present new and combined safety data, provide comparative tables of adverse event frequencies, retabulate premature trial discontinuations, provide case report forms and narrative summaries for deaths and serious adverse events, describe changes in common adverse events, provide updated exposure information, and summarize worldwide experience including foreign labeling translations.

Recommended response: Compile and submit a comprehensive safety update including all new nonclinical and clinical data, detailed analyses, and worldwide experience, following the specific requirements outlined in the letter, particularly 21 CFR 314.50(d).

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)

Proprietary Name Resubmission

Severity: info

The proposed proprietary name, Besremi, was found acceptable pending approval of the application in the current review cycle. It needs to be resubmitted when responding to the application deficiencies.

Recommended response: Resubmit the proposed proprietary name 'Besremi' with the complete response to the application deficiencies.

Bioburden and Sterility Test Method Suitability Data

Severity: minor

Additional data is needed for in-process bioburden and sterility test method suitability. Three batches should be used for testing method suitability in the bacteriostasis/fungistasis assay, but only two batches were provided for bioburden and one for sterility. Provide results from one additional batch for in-process bioburden and two additional batches for sterility test method suitability.

Recommended response: Provide bioburden and sterility test method suitability results for the required number of additional batches as recommended by the agency.

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
BLA

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
365 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The application received a Complete Response Letter primarily due to critical deficiencies in human factors validation, inability to conduct required facility inspections, and the need for a comprehensive safety update. Several other minor issues and recommendations were also noted.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…