Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 761180 (Jan 1, 2022)

Issued January 1, 2022

Issued

January 1, 2022

Application

Other • 761180

Review center

Other

Stage

Late Cycle

Letter type

Approval Letter

Product may be marketed.

Summary

This letter from the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research addresses deficiencies in Biologics License Application (BLA) 761180, specifically requesting a resubmission of the proposed proprietary name and a comprehensive safety update.

Key points

  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name when responding to application deficiencies.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b) when responding to deficiencies.
  • The safety update must include data from all nonclinical and clinical studies/trials of the drug under consideration, regardless of indication, dosage form, or dose level.
  • Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile.
  • Incorporate new safety data when assembling sections describing discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, and common adverse events.
  • Present new safety data from studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication using the same format as in the original submission.
  • Present tabulations of the new safety data combined with the original application data.
  • Include tables that compare frequencies of adverse events in the original application with the retabulated frequencies.

Cited reasons

  • Proprietary Name Resubmission
  • Comprehensive Safety Update Required
  • Revised Safety Data Presentation and Tabulation
  • Case Report Forms and Narrative Summaries for Safety Events
  • Analysis of Common Adverse Event Incidence Changes
  • The agency requires a comprehensive safety update, including detailed patient-level data for serious adverse events and deaths, revised safety data presentations, and an analysis of common adverse event incidence. Additionally, the proposed proprietary name needs to be resubmitted.

Recommended actions

  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name when responding to application deficiencies.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b) when responding to deficiencies.
  • The safety update must include data from all nonclinical and clinical studies/trials of the drug under consideration, regardless of indication, dosage form, or dose level.
  • Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile.
  • Incorporate new safety data when assembling sections describing discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, and common adverse events.
  • Present new safety data from studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication using the same format as in the original submission.
  • Present tabulations of the new safety data combined with the original application data.
  • Include tables that compare frequencies of adverse events in the original application with the retabulated frequencies.

Deficiency summary

The agency requires a comprehensive safety update, including detailed patient-level data for serious adverse events and deaths, revised safety data presentations, and an analysis of common adverse event incidence. Additionally, the proposed proprietary name needs to be resubmitted.

Findings

Proprietary Name Resubmission

Severity: minor

Resubmit the proposed proprietary name when responding to application deficiencies. The name was previously found acceptable pending approval of the application in the current review cycle.

Recommended response: Ensure the proprietary name submission package is complete and aligns with previous agreements, confirming no new issues have arisen since the prior acceptance.

Comprehensive Safety Update Required

Severity: major

Provide a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b). This update should include data from all nonclinical and clinical studies/trials of the drug under consideration, regardless of indication, dosage form, or dose level. Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile.

Recommended response: Compile all relevant safety data from both nonclinical and clinical studies, ensuring comprehensive coverage across all indications and dose levels. Clearly articulate any new or significant safety findings.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)

Revised Safety Data Presentation and Tabulation

Severity: major

Incorporate new safety data into sections describing discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, and common adverse events. Present new safety data from studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication using the same format as the original submission. Present tabulations of the new safety data combined with the original application data. Include tables comparing frequencies of adverse events in the original application with the retabulated frequencies. For indications other than the proposed indication, provide separate tables for adverse event frequencies.

Recommended response: Re-analyze and re-present all safety data according to the specified formats, ensuring clear comparisons between original and new data, and separate presentations for different indications. Focus on consistency with the original submission format where applicable.

Case Report Forms and Narrative Summaries for Safety Events

Severity: critical

Provide case report forms and narrative summaries for each patient who died during a clinical trial or who did not complete a trial because of an adverse event. In addition, provide narrative summaries for all serious adverse events.

Recommended response: Expedite the collection and submission of all requested case report forms and detailed narrative summaries for critical safety events, ensuring accuracy and completeness for each patient.

Analysis of Common Adverse Event Incidence Changes

Severity: major

Describe any information that suggests a substantial change in the incidence of common, but less serious, adverse events between the new data and the original application data.

Recommended response: Perform a thorough comparative analysis of common adverse event incidence, highlighting any significant shifts or trends between the original and new datasets.

Regulatory context

Submission stage
late cycle
Regulatory pathway
BLA

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
180 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The primary theme is the critical need for a comprehensive and meticulously organized update of all safety data, including detailed patient-level information for serious events, and a re-submission of the proprietary name to address significant deficiencies before approval can be considered.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…