Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other (Nov 13, 2025)

Issued November 13, 2025

Issued

November 13, 2025

Application

Other

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due November 13, 2026Product may be marketed.

Summary

This is a Complete Response letter from the FDA to Eli Lilly and Company regarding their Biologics License Application (BLA) 761215/Original 2 for Rezvoglar (insulin glargine-aglr) injection, seeking interchangeability with U.S.-licensed Lantus. The FDA has determined that the application cannot be approved in its present form, primarily due to the unexpired exclusivity period for a prior interchangeable biological product. The letter outlines regulatory reasons for non-approval, reserves comment on labeling, and details requirements for a safety update if the application is resubmitted.

Key points

  • The applicant must understand that a determination of interchangeability cannot be made for their 351(k) application at this time due to the unexpired exclusivity period described in section 351(k)(6) of the Public Health Service Act.
  • All future submissions to BLA 761215/Original 2 must specify the BLA number and the Original number to which each submission pertains.
  • If labeling is revised, the applicant must use the SRPI checklist to ensure Prescribing Information conforms with format items in regulations and guidances.
  • A response must include updated content of labeling in structured product labeling (SPL) format as described at FDA.gov if labeling is revised.
  • When responding to deficiencies, the applicant must include a safety update.
  • The safety update must include data from all nonclinical and clinical studies of the product under consideration regardless of indication, dosage form, or dose level.
  • The safety update must describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile and their relevance to clinically meaningful differences between the proposed biosimilar product and the U.S.-licensed reference product.
  • The safety update must present new safety data from clinical studies for the proposed indication using the same format as the original BLA submission.

Cited reasons

  • Interchangeability Exclusivity Period Not Expired
  • Comprehensive Safety Update Required
  • Significant Safety Profile Changes and Clinical Meaningfulness
  • Incorporation of New Safety Data
  • Retabulation of Premature Study Discontinuations
  • Case Report Forms and Narrative Summaries for Deaths/SAEs
  • Changes in Incidence of Common Adverse Events
  • Updated Clinical Study Exposure Information

Recommended actions

  • The applicant must understand that a determination of interchangeability cannot be made for their 351(k) application at this time due to the unexpired exclusivity period described in section 351(k)(6) of the Public Health Service Act.
  • All future submissions to BLA 761215/Original 2 must specify the BLA number and the Original number to which each submission pertains.
  • If labeling is revised, the applicant must use the SRPI checklist to ensure Prescribing Information conforms with format items in regulations and guidances.
  • A response must include updated content of labeling in structured product labeling (SPL) format as described at FDA.gov if labeling is revised.
  • When responding to deficiencies, the applicant must include a safety update.
  • The safety update must include data from all nonclinical and clinical studies of the product under consideration regardless of indication, dosage form, or dose level.
  • The safety update must describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile and their relevance to clinically meaningful differences between the proposed biosimilar product and the U.S.-licensed reference product.
  • The safety update must present new safety data from clinical studies for the proposed indication using the same format as the original BLA submission.

Deficiency summary

The application for interchangeable biosimilar approval cannot be approved due to an unexpired exclusivity period for the reference product's prior interchangeable determination. Additionally, the submission requires a comprehensive safety update, including detailed analysis of safety profile changes, incorporation of new clinical data, updated exposure information, worldwide safety experience, and English translations of foreign labeling.

Findings

Interchangeability Exclusivity Period Not Expired

Severity: critical

The application relies on a reference product for which a prior biological product received a determination of interchangeability on July 28, 2021. As a second or subsequent biological product, a determination of interchangeability cannot be made until the exclusivity period described in section 351(k)(6)(A)-(C) of the Public Health Service Act has expired.

Recommended response: Monitor the exclusivity period of the first interchangeable biosimilar and resubmit the application once the exclusivity period has expired, as per section 351(k)(6) of the PHS Act.

Cited: section 351(k) of the Public Health Service Act, section 351(k)(6), section 351(k)(4)

Comprehensive Safety Update Required

Severity: major

A comprehensive safety update must be included with the response, encompassing data from all nonclinical and clinical studies of the product, regardless of indication, dosage form, or dose level.

Recommended response: Prepare a comprehensive safety update incorporating all nonclinical and clinical study data, ensuring it covers all indications, dosage forms, and dose levels.

Significant Safety Profile Changes and Clinical Meaningfulness

Severity: major

Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile and their relevance, if any, to whether there may be clinically meaningful differences between the proposed biosimilar product and the U.S.-licensed reference product.

Recommended response: Analyze and describe any significant changes in the safety profile, specifically addressing their clinical meaningfulness in comparison to the reference product.

Incorporation of New Safety Data

Severity: major

Incorporate new safety data into sections describing discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, and common adverse events. This includes presenting new data in the same format as the original BLA, tabulating new data combined with original BLA data, and comparing frequencies of adverse events.

Recommended response: Integrate new safety data into existing sections for discontinuations, SAEs, and common AEs, ensuring consistent formatting and comparative tabulations with original BLA data.

Retabulation of Premature Study Discontinuations

Severity: major

Present a retabulation of the reasons for premature study discontinuation by incorporating drop-outs from newly completed studies and describe any new trends or patterns identified.

Recommended response: Update the tabulation of premature study discontinuations with data from newly completed studies and identify any emerging trends.

Case Report Forms and Narrative Summaries for Deaths/SAEs

Severity: major

Provide case report forms and narrative summaries for each patient who died during a clinical study or who did not complete a study because of an adverse event. Additionally, provide narrative summaries for serious adverse events.

Recommended response: Compile and submit all required case report forms and narrative summaries for patient deaths and serious adverse events from clinical studies.

Changes in Incidence of Common Adverse Events

Severity: major

Describe any information that suggests a substantial change in the incidence of common, but less serious, adverse events between the new data and the original BLA data.

Recommended response: Analyze and report any substantial changes in the incidence of common, less serious adverse events when comparing new and original BLA data.

Updated Clinical Study Exposure Information

Severity: major

Provide updated exposure information for the clinical studies (e.g., number of subjects, person time).

Recommended response: Submit updated exposure information for all clinical studies, including metrics like number of subjects and person-time.

Summary of Worldwide Safety Experience

Severity: major

Provide a summary of worldwide experience on the safety of this product, including adverse events known to be associated with the use of the product and immunogenicity. Include an updated estimate of use for this product marketed in other countries.

Recommended response: Compile a comprehensive summary of worldwide safety experience, including adverse events, immunogenicity, and updated usage estimates from other countries.

English Translations of Foreign Labeling

Severity: minor

Provide English translations of current approved foreign labeling not previously submitted.

Recommended response: Submit English translations for all current approved foreign labeling that has not yet been provided.

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
351(k) Biologics License Application (interchangeable biosimilar)

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
365 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The primary obstacle to approval is the unexpired exclusivity period for the reference product's interchangeable biosimilar designation. Additionally, the application requires a thorough and updated safety data package, including detailed clinical analyses, worldwide experience, and complete documentation.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…