Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 761219 (Jan 1, 2023)

Issued January 1, 2023

Issued

January 1, 2023

Application

Other • 761219

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due January 1, 2024Product may be marketed.

Summary

This document is an 'Other Action Letter' from the FDA regarding Biosimilar License Application (BLA) 761219. It outlines deficiencies related to prescribing information, carton and container labeling, proprietary name, and safety updates, and also includes specific requirements for device testing. The letter instructs the applicant on necessary actions for resubmission to achieve approval.

Key points

  • Review labeling review resources, including Prescription Drug Labeling Resources, Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule websites, and FDA guidance for industry Labeling for Biosimilar Products.
  • If labeling is revised, use the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI) checklist to ensure conformity with format items in regulations and guidances.
  • Include updated content of labeling [21 CFR 601.14(b)] in structured product labeling (SPL) format in the response.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name (Yuflyma) when responding to the application deficiencies.
  • Include a safety update with data from all nonclinical and clinical studies of the product, regardless of indication, dosage form, or dose level.
  • Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile and their relevance to clinically meaningful differences between the proposed biosimilar product and the U.S.-licensed reference product.
  • Present new safety data from clinical studies for the proposed indication using the same format as the original BLA submission.
  • Present tabulations of the new safety data combined with the original BLA data.

Cited reasons

  • Prescribing Information Not Yet Adequate
  • Proprietary Name Resubmission Required
  • Comprehensive Safety Update Required
  • Inadequate Safety Data Presentation and Tabulation
  • Analysis of Premature Study Discontinuation Needed
  • Missing Case Report Forms and Narrative Summaries for Safety Events
  • Analysis of Changes in Common Adverse Event Incidence
  • Updated Clinical Exposure Information Required

Recommended actions

  • Review labeling review resources, including Prescription Drug Labeling Resources, Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule websites, and FDA guidance for industry Labeling for Biosimilar Products.
  • If labeling is revised, use the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI) checklist to ensure conformity with format items in regulations and guidances.
  • Include updated content of labeling [21 CFR 601.14(b)] in structured product labeling (SPL) format in the response.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name (Yuflyma) when responding to the application deficiencies.
  • Include a safety update with data from all nonclinical and clinical studies of the product, regardless of indication, dosage form, or dose level.
  • Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile and their relevance to clinically meaningful differences between the proposed biosimilar product and the U.S.-licensed reference product.
  • Present new safety data from clinical studies for the proposed indication using the same format as the original BLA submission.
  • Present tabulations of the new safety data combined with the original BLA data.

Deficiency summary

The application received a Complete Response Letter primarily due to outstanding safety data requirements, issues with the presentation and completeness of clinical safety information, and unresolved labeling matters including the proprietary name. The agency reserves comment on proposed labeling until other deficiencies are addressed and requires a comprehensive safety update, including worldwide experience and specific data presentations. English translations of foreign labeling are also needed.

Findings

Prescribing Information Not Yet Adequate

Severity: major

The agency reserves comment on the proposed labeling until the application is otherwise adequate. The sponsor is encouraged to review labeling resources, regulations, and guidance documents, including the SRPI checklist. A response must include updated content of labeling [21 CFR 601.14(b)] in structured product labeling (SPL) format.

Recommended response: Revise and resubmit the Prescribing Information, ensuring compliance with all relevant regulations and guidances, and provide it in SPL format.

Cited: 21 CFR 601.14(b)

Proprietary Name Resubmission Required

Severity: major

The proposed proprietary name, Yuflyma, was addressed in prior correspondence (August 11, 2022, and February 22, 2021) and found conditionally acceptable pending approval. The sponsor must resubmit the proposed proprietary name when responding to application deficiencies.

Recommended response: Resubmit the proprietary name, Yuflyma, as part of the complete response to the application deficiencies.

Comprehensive Safety Update Required

Severity: critical

A safety update is required, including data from all nonclinical and clinical studies regardless of indication, dosage form, or dose level. This update must detail significant changes in the safety profile and their relevance to clinically meaningful differences between the biosimilar and reference product.

Recommended response: Provide a detailed and comprehensive safety update, analyzing and describing any significant changes in the safety profile and their implications for biosimilarity.

Inadequate Safety Data Presentation and Tabulation

Severity: critical

New safety data from clinical studies for the proposed indication must be incorporated into sections describing discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, and common adverse events. This includes presenting new safety data in the same format as the original BLA, tabulations of new data combined with original BLA data, and tables comparing frequencies of adverse events.

Recommended response: Re-tabulate and present all safety data, including new clinical study data, combined with original BLA data, and provide comparative analyses of adverse event frequencies.

Analysis of Premature Study Discontinuation Needed

Severity: major

A retabulation of the reasons for premature study discontinuation is required, incorporating drop-outs from newly completed studies. Any new trends or patterns identified must be described.

Recommended response: Update and analyze data on premature study discontinuations, identifying and describing any new trends.

Missing Case Report Forms and Narrative Summaries for Safety Events

Severity: critical

Provide case report forms and narrative summaries for each subject who died during a clinical study or who did not complete a study because of an adverse event. Additionally, narrative summaries for all serious adverse events are required.

Recommended response: Submit all requested case report forms and narrative summaries for deaths, study discontinuations due to AEs, and serious adverse events.

Analysis of Changes in Common Adverse Event Incidence

Severity: major

Describe any information that suggests a substantial change in the incidence of common, but less serious, adverse events between the new data and the original BLA data.

Recommended response: Conduct an analysis to identify and describe any substantial changes in the incidence of common adverse events.

Updated Clinical Exposure Information Required

Severity: major

Provide updated exposure information for the clinical studies (e.g., number of subjects, person time).

Recommended response: Submit updated clinical exposure data, including subject numbers and person-time.

Worldwide Safety Experience and Foreign Labeling Translations Needed

Severity: critical

Provide a summary of worldwide experience on the safety of this product, including adverse events known to be associated with its use and immunogenicity. Include an updated estimate of use for this product marketed in other countries. Additionally, English translations of current approved foreign labeling not previously submitted are required.

Recommended response: Compile and submit a comprehensive summary of worldwide safety data, including immunogenicity and usage estimates, along with English translations of all relevant foreign labeling.

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
Biosimilar Biologics License Application (BLA)

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
365 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The primary themes of the Complete Response Letter are the need for a comprehensive and updated safety data package, including detailed analyses and worldwide experience, and the finalization of labeling, particularly the proprietary name and prescribing information, to ensure regulatory compliance and product safety.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…