Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 761225 (Jan 1, 2024)

Issued January 1, 2024

Issued

January 1, 2024

Application

Other • 761225

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due December 31, 2024Product may be marketed.

Summary

This is a Complete Response Letter from the FDA to Hugel, Inc. regarding their Biologics License Application (BLA) for letibotulinumtoxinA injection. The FDA has determined that the application cannot be approved in its present form due to several deficiencies, including unresolved facility inspection issues, pending labeling comments, and requirements for a comprehensive safety update.

Key points

  • Satisfactorily resolve deficiencies identified during the inspection of the Hugel, Inc. manufacturing and testing facility (FEI 3012163998).
  • Review labeling review resources, including Prescription Drug Labeling Resources, Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule websites, and the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI) checklist.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name (Letybo) when responding to the application deficiencies.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b) when responding to deficiencies.
  • The safety update must describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile.
  • The safety update must incorporate new safety data from studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication, presenting it in the same format as the original submission.
  • The safety update must present tabulations of new safety data combined with the original application data.
  • The safety update must include tables comparing frequencies of adverse events in the original application with retabulated frequencies.

Cited reasons

  • Unresolved Manufacturing Facility Deficiencies
  • Reserved Comment on Proposed Prescribing Information
  • Reserved Comment on Proposed Carton and Container Labeling
  • Resubmission of Proprietary Name
  • Comprehensive Safety Update Required
  • The application cannot be approved in its current form due to unresolved manufacturing facility deficiencies. Additionally, the agency has reserved comments on proposed labeling until other issues are resolved and requires a comprehensive safety update upon resubmission.

Recommended actions

  • Satisfactorily resolve deficiencies identified during the inspection of the Hugel, Inc. manufacturing and testing facility (FEI 3012163998).
  • Review labeling review resources, including Prescription Drug Labeling Resources, Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule websites, and the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI) checklist.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name (Letybo) when responding to the application deficiencies.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b) when responding to deficiencies.
  • The safety update must describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile.
  • The safety update must incorporate new safety data from studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication, presenting it in the same format as the original submission.
  • The safety update must present tabulations of new safety data combined with the original application data.
  • The safety update must include tables comparing frequencies of adverse events in the original application with retabulated frequencies.

Deficiency summary

The application cannot be approved in its current form due to unresolved manufacturing facility deficiencies. Additionally, the agency has reserved comments on proposed labeling until other issues are resolved and requires a comprehensive safety update upon resubmission.

Findings

Unresolved Manufacturing Facility Deficiencies

Severity: critical

During a recent inspection of the Hugel, Inc. manufacturing and testing facility, field investigators conveyed deficiencies. Satisfactory resolution of these deficiencies is required before this application may be approved.

Recommended response: Address all deficiencies identified during the facility inspection and ensure satisfactory resolution. Provide documentation of corrective and preventive actions (CAPAs) and their effectiveness.

Reserved Comment on Proposed Prescribing Information

Severity: major

The agency reserves comment on the proposed labeling until the application is otherwise adequate. The sponsor is encouraged to review labeling review resources, regulations, and related guidance documents, including the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI) checklist.

Recommended response: Proactively review proposed labeling against current FDA regulations and guidance documents, including the SRPI checklist, to anticipate and address potential deficiencies.

Reserved Comment on Proposed Carton and Container Labeling

Severity: major

The agency reserves comment on the proposed carton and container labeling until the application is otherwise adequate.

Recommended response: Proactively review proposed carton and container labeling against current FDA regulations and guidance documents.

Resubmission of Proprietary Name

Severity: minor

The proposed proprietary name, Letybo, was found acceptable pending approval of the application. The sponsor is required to resubmit the proposed proprietary name when responding to the application deficiencies.

Recommended response: Include the previously accepted proprietary name in the resubmission package.

Comprehensive Safety Update Required

Severity: major

A safety update is required upon resubmission, as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b). This update must include data from all nonclinical and clinical studies/trials, detailing significant changes, incorporating new safety data into adverse event sections, presenting combined data, comparing frequencies, and retabulating reasons for premature trial discontinuation.

Recommended response: Compile a comprehensive safety update including all nonclinical and clinical data, presenting new and combined data as specified, and analyzing for new trends or patterns. Ensure compliance with 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b).

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
BLA

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
450 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The primary barrier to approval is unresolved manufacturing facility deficiencies, necessitating a complete resubmission that also includes a comprehensive safety data update and addresses pending labeling comments.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…