Insufficient Clinical Efficacy for Accelerated Approval
Severity: criticalCurrent results of Study AK105-202 in patients with metastatic non-keratinizing NPC do not provide a meaningful advantage over currently available therapy, failing to meet requirements for accelerated approval.
Recommended response: Conduct a multiregional randomized clinical trial comparing penpulimab-kcqx to an acceptable control in patients with metastatic NPC, utilizing PFS and OS endpoints, and enrolling an adequate representation of U.S. patients.
Cited: Section 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 601.41 Subpart E
Inadequate Suitability of Quality Control Methods
Severity: majorThe totality of information and data provided is inadequate to support the suitability of specified quality control methods for their intended use.
Recommended response: Optimize and validate the identified quality control methods for their intended use. Provide updated method procedures and validation/revalidation results to support their suitability for routine process and product control.
Insufficient Data for Process Control Ranges
Severity: majorInformation provided is insufficient to support the proposed process control ranges for the penpulimab-kcqx drug product manufacturing process.
Recommended response: Provide additional information and data from appropriate process validation and stability studies to support the proposed process control ranges for routine manufacture.
Missing Medication Guide Statement on Labeling
Severity: minorRequired bolded statement for Medication Guide ("ATTENTION PHARMACIST: Each patient is required to receive the enclosed Medication Guide.") is missing from carton and container labeling.
Recommended response: Add the specified bolded statement or an appropriate alternative to the carton and container labeling.
Cited: 21 CFR 208.24(d)
Unresolved Manufacturing Facility Inspection Deficiencies
Severity: criticalDeficiencies identified during the pre-license inspection of Akeso Biopharma, Co., Ltd. (Guangdong, China) manufacturing facility have not been satisfactorily resolved.
Recommended response: Provide satisfactory responses to the facility deficiencies to the email address provided on the Form FDA 483 Inspectional Observations, prior to submitting the complete response. Include the date of the facility’s response in the complete response.
Incomplete Safety Update Requirements for Complete Response
Severity: majorA comprehensive safety update is required with the complete response, encompassing all nonclinical and clinical studies/trials. Specific requirements include describing significant changes, presenting new and combined safety data in tabulations, comparing frequencies, providing separate tables for other indications, retabulating reasons for premature discontinuation, providing case reports/narrative summaries for deaths/SAEs, describing changes in common AE incidence, updating exposure information, providing worldwide safety experience, and English translations of foreign labeling.
Recommended response: Prepare a detailed safety update addressing all points (7-14) as specified in the letter, ensuring all new and existing safety data are comprehensively presented and analyzed.