Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 761258 (Jan 1, 2025)

Issued January 1, 2025

Issued

January 1, 2025

Application

Other • 761258

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due January 1, 2026Product may be marketed.

Summary

This is a Complete Response letter from the FDA to Akeso Biopharma Co., Ltd. regarding their Biologics License Application (BLA) for AK105 (penpulimab-kcqx). The FDA has determined that the application cannot be approved in its present form due to clinical, quality, labeling, and facility inspection deficiencies, and provides recommendations for addressing these issues.

Key points

  • Conduct a multiregional randomized clinical trial comparing penpulimab-kcqx to an acceptable control in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), utilizing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) endpoints, and enrolling an adequate representation of U.S. patients.
  • Provide additional data to support the suitability of new cell bank(s) for manufacturing, including growth data, drug substance (DS) release data, and extended analytical characterization data.
  • Optimize and validate quality control methods for their intended use, and provide updated method procedures and validation/revalidation results.
  • Provide additional information and data from appropriate process validation and stability studies to support proposed process control ranges for routine manufacture of the drug product (DP).
  • Review labeling review resources, use the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI) checklist, and include updated content of labeling in structured product labeling (SPL) format if labeling is revised.
  • Add the bolded statement 'ATTENTION PHARMACIST: Each patient is required to receive the enclosed Medication Guide' or an appropriate alternative to the carton and container labeling per 21 CFR 208.24(d).
  • Provide satisfactory responses to all deficiencies conveyed by the FDA following the pre-license inspection (PLI) of the manufacturing facility.
  • Include a safety update with data from all nonclinical and clinical studies/trials of the product, describing any significant changes or findings in the safety profile.

Cited reasons

  • Insufficient Clinical Efficacy for Accelerated Approval
  • Inadequate Suitability of Quality Control Methods
  • Insufficient Data for Process Control Ranges
  • Missing Medication Guide Statement on Labeling
  • Unresolved Manufacturing Facility Inspection Deficiencies
  • Incomplete Safety Update Requirements for Complete Response
  • The FDA issued a Complete Response Letter for AK105, citing several deficiencies across clinical, quality, and manufacturing aspects. Key issues include insufficient clinical efficacy data to demonstrate a meaningful advantage for accelerated approval in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, inadequate suitability of quality control methods, insufficient data to support process control ranges, unresolved manufacturing facility inspection findings, and a missing Medication Guide statement on labeling. A comprehensive safety update is also required for resubmission.

Recommended actions

  • Conduct a multiregional randomized clinical trial comparing penpulimab-kcqx to an acceptable control in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), utilizing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) endpoints, and enrolling an adequate representation of U.S. patients.
  • Provide additional data to support the suitability of new cell bank(s) for manufacturing, including growth data, drug substance (DS) release data, and extended analytical characterization data.
  • Optimize and validate quality control methods for their intended use, and provide updated method procedures and validation/revalidation results.
  • Provide additional information and data from appropriate process validation and stability studies to support proposed process control ranges for routine manufacture of the drug product (DP).
  • Review labeling review resources, use the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI) checklist, and include updated content of labeling in structured product labeling (SPL) format if labeling is revised.
  • Add the bolded statement 'ATTENTION PHARMACIST: Each patient is required to receive the enclosed Medication Guide' or an appropriate alternative to the carton and container labeling per 21 CFR 208.24(d).
  • Provide satisfactory responses to all deficiencies conveyed by the FDA following the pre-license inspection (PLI) of the manufacturing facility.
  • Include a safety update with data from all nonclinical and clinical studies/trials of the product, describing any significant changes or findings in the safety profile.

Deficiency summary

The FDA issued a Complete Response Letter for AK105, citing several deficiencies across clinical, quality, and manufacturing aspects. Key issues include insufficient clinical efficacy data to demonstrate a meaningful advantage for accelerated approval in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, inadequate suitability of quality control methods, insufficient data to support process control ranges, unresolved manufacturing facility inspection findings, and a missing Medication Guide statement on labeling. A comprehensive safety update is also required for resubmission.

Findings

Insufficient Clinical Efficacy for Accelerated Approval

Severity: critical

Current results of Study AK105-202 in patients with metastatic non-keratinizing NPC do not provide a meaningful advantage over currently available therapy, failing to meet requirements for accelerated approval.

Recommended response: Conduct a multiregional randomized clinical trial comparing penpulimab-kcqx to an acceptable control in patients with metastatic NPC, utilizing PFS and OS endpoints, and enrolling an adequate representation of U.S. patients.

Cited: Section 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 601.41 Subpart E

Inadequate Suitability of Quality Control Methods

Severity: major

The totality of information and data provided is inadequate to support the suitability of specified quality control methods for their intended use.

Recommended response: Optimize and validate the identified quality control methods for their intended use. Provide updated method procedures and validation/revalidation results to support their suitability for routine process and product control.

Insufficient Data for Process Control Ranges

Severity: major

Information provided is insufficient to support the proposed process control ranges for the penpulimab-kcqx drug product manufacturing process.

Recommended response: Provide additional information and data from appropriate process validation and stability studies to support the proposed process control ranges for routine manufacture.

Missing Medication Guide Statement on Labeling

Severity: minor

Required bolded statement for Medication Guide ("ATTENTION PHARMACIST: Each patient is required to receive the enclosed Medication Guide.") is missing from carton and container labeling.

Recommended response: Add the specified bolded statement or an appropriate alternative to the carton and container labeling.

Cited: 21 CFR 208.24(d)

Unresolved Manufacturing Facility Inspection Deficiencies

Severity: critical

Deficiencies identified during the pre-license inspection of Akeso Biopharma, Co., Ltd. (Guangdong, China) manufacturing facility have not been satisfactorily resolved.

Recommended response: Provide satisfactory responses to the facility deficiencies to the email address provided on the Form FDA 483 Inspectional Observations, prior to submitting the complete response. Include the date of the facility’s response in the complete response.

Incomplete Safety Update Requirements for Complete Response

Severity: major

A comprehensive safety update is required with the complete response, encompassing all nonclinical and clinical studies/trials. Specific requirements include describing significant changes, presenting new and combined safety data in tabulations, comparing frequencies, providing separate tables for other indications, retabulating reasons for premature discontinuation, providing case reports/narrative summaries for deaths/SAEs, describing changes in common AE incidence, updating exposure information, providing worldwide safety experience, and English translations of foreign labeling.

Recommended response: Prepare a detailed safety update addressing all points (7-14) as specified in the letter, ensuring all new and existing safety data are comprehensively presented and analyzed.

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
BLA (351(a))

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
365 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The application was not approved due to a combination of insufficient clinical evidence for accelerated approval, unresolved CMC/quality control issues, outstanding manufacturing facility inspection deficiencies, and minor labeling non-compliance. A comprehensive safety update is also mandated for resubmission.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…