Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 761279 (Jan 1, 2023)

Issued January 1, 2023

Issued

January 1, 2023

Application

Other • 761279

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due January 1, 2024Product may be marketed.

Summary

This is a Complete Response Letter from the FDA to Eli Lilly and Company regarding their Biologics License Application (BLA) 761279 for LY3074828 injection for ulcerative colitis. The FDA has determined that the application cannot be approved in its current form due to deficiencies related to facility inspections, prescribing information, and the need for a comprehensive safety update.

Key points

  • Achieve satisfactory resolution of deficiencies identified during the pre-license inspection of the ELI LILLY AND COMPANY manufacturing facility in Indianapolis, Indiana (FEI 1819470).
  • Submit draft labeling that is responsive to electronic communications dated March 15, 2023 (for Prescribing Information and Medication Guide) and March 2, 2023 (for Instructions for Use).
  • Use the SRPI checklist to correct any formatting errors in the labeling to ensure conformance with regulations and guidances.
  • Submit updated content of labeling in Structured Product Labeling (SPL) format as described at FDA.gov.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name when responding to the application deficiencies.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b) when responding to deficiencies.
  • Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile within the safety update.
  • Incorporate new safety data from studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication into sections describing discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, and common adverse events, using the same format as the original submission.

Cited reasons

  • Unresolved Manufacturing Facility Inspection Deficiencies
  • Inadequate Prescribing Information and Formatting
  • Proprietary Name Resubmission Required
  • Incomplete Safety Update
  • The application cannot be approved in its present form due to unresolved manufacturing facility inspection deficiencies, inadequate prescribing information and formatting, and an incomplete safety update requiring significant additional data and analysis.

Recommended actions

  • Achieve satisfactory resolution of deficiencies identified during the pre-license inspection of the ELI LILLY AND COMPANY manufacturing facility in Indianapolis, Indiana (FEI 1819470).
  • Submit draft labeling that is responsive to electronic communications dated March 15, 2023 (for Prescribing Information and Medication Guide) and March 2, 2023 (for Instructions for Use).
  • Use the SRPI checklist to correct any formatting errors in the labeling to ensure conformance with regulations and guidances.
  • Submit updated content of labeling in Structured Product Labeling (SPL) format as described at FDA.gov.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name when responding to the application deficiencies.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b) when responding to deficiencies.
  • Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile within the safety update.
  • Incorporate new safety data from studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication into sections describing discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, and common adverse events, using the same format as the original submission.

Deficiency summary

The application cannot be approved in its present form due to unresolved manufacturing facility inspection deficiencies, inadequate prescribing information and formatting, and an incomplete safety update requiring significant additional data and analysis.

Findings

Unresolved Manufacturing Facility Inspection Deficiencies

Severity: critical

Satisfactory resolution of deficiencies identified during the pre-license inspection of the ELI LILLY AND COMPANY manufacturing facility (FEI 1819470) in Indianapolis, Indiana, is required before approval.

Recommended response: Address all outstanding deficiencies identified during the pre-license inspection of the manufacturing facility to ensure compliance with GMP regulations and facilitate approval.

Inadequate Prescribing Information and Formatting

Severity: major

Submit revised draft labeling responsive to previous electronic communications for the Prescribing Information, Medication Guide, and Instructions for Use. Correct formatting errors using the SRPI checklist and submit updated content of labeling in Structured Product Labeling (SPL) format.

Recommended response: Revise all labeling documents (Prescribing Information, Medication Guide, Instructions for Use) to address previous communications, ensure compliance with SRPI checklist formatting, and submit updated content in SPL format.

Cited: 21 CFR 601.14(b)

Proprietary Name Resubmission Required

Severity: minor

The proposed proprietary name must be resubmitted when responding to the application deficiencies.

Recommended response: Resubmit the proposed proprietary name along with the response to other deficiencies.

Incomplete Safety Update

Severity: major

Provide a comprehensive safety update as described in 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), including data from all nonclinical and clinical studies/trials. This includes detailed changes in safety profile, new safety data tabulations, comparison tables of adverse event frequencies, case report forms and narrative summaries for deaths/serious adverse events, updated exposure information, worldwide experience summary, and English translations of foreign labeling.

Recommended response: Provide a comprehensive safety update addressing all specified requirements, including detailed data analysis, narrative summaries, worldwide experience, and updated exposure information, in accordance with 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b).

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
BLA 351(a)

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
270 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The application received a Complete Response due to critical manufacturing site deficiencies, non-compliant labeling, and insufficient safety data updates, necessitating a comprehensive resubmission.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…