Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 761306 (Jan 1, 2024)

Issued January 1, 2024

Issued

January 1, 2024

Application

Other • 761306

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Product may be marketed.

Summary

This is a Complete Response Letter from the FDA to Eli Lilly and Company regarding their Biologics License Application (BLA) for lebrikizumab injection. The FDA has determined that the application cannot be approved in its present form due to unresolved product quality issues related to manufacturing facility deficiencies, data reliability concerns, and pending labeling and proprietary name reviews. The letter outlines specific deficiencies and provides recommendations for resolution, including a comprehensive safety update.

Key points

  • Satisfactorily resolve all deficiencies identified during the Remote Regulatory Assessment (RRA) and pre-license inspection (PLI) of the drug substance manufacturing facility, providing responses to the inspection team prior to submitting the complete response.
  • Include the date of the facility's response to the FDA Form 483 in the complete response.
  • Address concerns regarding the reliability of data generated at the manufacturing facility by engaging an independent third party to develop and conduct a comprehensive assessment on the impacted information and data.
  • Confirm with the FDA that the protocol for the independent assessment is adequate to cover identified data reliability concerns.
  • Provide additional reliable and accurate information and data (e.g., testing results from repeated studies) if impacted data are removed or changes are made to the control strategy to support consistent process performance and product quality.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name (Ebglyss) after all application deficiencies have been resolved.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b) when responding to deficiencies, detailing significant changes or findings in the safety profile.
  • Present new safety data from studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication in the same format as the original submission, combined with original application data, and include tables comparing frequencies of adverse events.

Cited reasons

  • Unresolved Manufacturing Facility Deficiencies
  • Data Reliability Concerns and Comparability Issues
  • Prescribing Information and Carton/Container Labeling Comments Reserved
  • Proprietary Name Resubmission Required
  • Comprehensive Safety Update Required
  • Process Validation Data for Pre-filled Syringe Needle Safety Device
  • The Biologics License Application for lebrikizumab injection cannot be approved in its present form due to significant unresolved manufacturing facility deficiencies, concerns regarding data reliability impacting product comparability and the overall control strategy, and the need for a comprehensive safety update. Labeling and proprietary name issues are contingent on resolving these primary deficiencies.

Recommended actions

  • Satisfactorily resolve all deficiencies identified during the Remote Regulatory Assessment (RRA) and pre-license inspection (PLI) of the drug substance manufacturing facility, providing responses to the inspection team prior to submitting the complete response.
  • Include the date of the facility's response to the FDA Form 483 in the complete response.
  • Address concerns regarding the reliability of data generated at the manufacturing facility by engaging an independent third party to develop and conduct a comprehensive assessment on the impacted information and data.
  • Confirm with the FDA that the protocol for the independent assessment is adequate to cover identified data reliability concerns.
  • Provide additional reliable and accurate information and data (e.g., testing results from repeated studies) if impacted data are removed or changes are made to the control strategy to support consistent process performance and product quality.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name (Ebglyss) after all application deficiencies have been resolved.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b) when responding to deficiencies, detailing significant changes or findings in the safety profile.
  • Present new safety data from studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication in the same format as the original submission, combined with original application data, and include tables comparing frequencies of adverse events.

Deficiency summary

The Biologics License Application for lebrikizumab injection cannot be approved in its present form due to significant unresolved manufacturing facility deficiencies, concerns regarding data reliability impacting product comparability and the overall control strategy, and the need for a comprehensive safety update. Labeling and proprietary name issues are contingent on resolving these primary deficiencies.

Findings

Unresolved Manufacturing Facility Deficiencies

Severity: major

Issues identified during a Remote Regulatory Assessment (RRA) and pre-license inspection (PLI) at the drug substance manufacturing facility remain unsatisfactorily resolved. Satisfactory responses are required prior to submitting a complete response, and a re-inspection may be necessary.

Recommended response: Work closely with the manufacturing facility to address and resolve all identified deficiencies. Provide comprehensive and satisfactory responses to the inspection team, including the date of the facility’s response to the FDA Form 483, before resubmitting the application.

Data Reliability Concerns and Comparability Issues

Severity: critical

Concerns exist regarding the reliability of data generated at the manufacturing facility, which impacts the comparability between commercial and clinical materials. This prevents determination of the adequacy of the proposed drug substance manufacturing process and overall control strategy.

Recommended response: Engage an independent third party to develop a protocol for, and conduct, a comprehensive assessment of the impacted information and data. Confirm the protocol's adequacy with FDA. If data are removed or control strategy changes are made, provide reliable and accurate additional information and data (e.g., testing results from repeated studies).

Prescribing Information and Carton/Container Labeling Comments Reserved

Severity: minor

FDA reserves comment on the proposed prescribing information and carton/container labeling until the application is otherwise adequate. The sponsor is encouraged to review available labeling resources.

Recommended response: Review FDA's Prescription Drug Labeling Resources and Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule websites to prepare for future labeling negotiations once other critical deficiencies are resolved.

Proprietary Name Resubmission Required

Severity: info

The proposed proprietary name, Ebglyss, was conditionally acceptable. However, it must be resubmitted once all other application deficiencies identified in this letter have been addressed.

Recommended response: Resubmit the proposed proprietary name request only after all other deficiencies outlined in this Complete Response Letter have been fully resolved and addressed.

Comprehensive Safety Update Required

Severity: major

A comprehensive safety update, as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), is required when responding to the deficiencies. This includes specific requirements for presenting new safety data, tabulations, comparisons, case report forms for deaths/discontinuations, summaries of serious adverse events, updated exposure information, and worldwide safety experience.

Recommended response: Prepare a detailed safety update strictly adhering to the requirements of 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), ensuring all specified data presentations, summaries, and analyses are included.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)

Process Validation Data for Pre-filled Syringe Needle Safety Device

Severity: major

A re-evaluation of the process validation data for the pre-filled syringe needle safety device (PFS-NSD) drug product manufacturing process is required.

Recommended response: Conduct a thorough re-evaluation of the process validation data for the PFS-NSD manufacturing process and submit the updated information.

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
BLA (351a)

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
365 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The primary themes for this Complete Response Letter are significant manufacturing quality system deficiencies, unresolved data integrity concerns impacting product comparability and the overall control strategy, and the necessity for a comprehensive safety update. Labeling and proprietary name issues are secondary and contingent upon the resolution of these critical manufacturing and data-related deficiencies.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…