Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesALApproval Letter

Approval Letter Other 761365 (Jan 1, 2024)

Issued January 1, 2024

Issued

January 1, 2024

Application

Other • 761365

Review center

Other

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Approval Letter

Response due December 31, 2024Product may be marketed.

Summary

This letter from the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research addresses deficiencies in Biologics License Application (BLA) 761365 for IMAB362 drug product. It outlines specific requirements related to analytical methods, manufacturing, labeling, proprietary name, and a comprehensive safety update, instructing the applicant on necessary actions for potential approval.

Key points

  • Update the method procedure in section 3.2.P.5.2 to reflect that the method is performed according to USP <71> compendial method.
  • Provide complete container closure integrity test (CCIT) method validation results for the proposed dye ingress method, including validation for precision (repeatability, intermediate precision, and reproducibility) and robustness.
  • Provide additional data and/or information to support that the commercial manufacturing process is capable of manufacturing IMAB362 drug product reproducibly.
  • Review labeling review resources on the Prescription Drug Labeling Resources and Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule websites.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name, VYLOY, when all application deficiencies identified in this letter have been addressed.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b) when responding to deficiencies.
  • Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile in the safety update.
  • Present new safety data from studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication using the same format as in the original submission.

Cited reasons

  • Incomplete Container Closure Integrity Test (CCIT) Method Validation
  • Lack of Data for Manufacturing Reproducibility
  • Proprietary Name Resubmission Contingent on Deficiency Resolution
  • Incomplete Safety Update
  • Insufficient Detail in Adverse Event Reporting
  • Outdated Clinical Exposure Information
  • Missing Worldwide Safety Experience Summary
  • The application received a Complete Response Letter due to significant deficiencies in Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) related to container closure integrity test (CCIT) method validation and manufacturing reproducibility. Additionally, extensive requirements for a comprehensive safety update, including detailed adverse event reporting and worldwide safety experience, were identified. The proprietary name is conditionally acceptable pending resolution of all other deficiencies.

Recommended actions

  • Update the method procedure in section 3.2.P.5.2 to reflect that the method is performed according to USP <71> compendial method.
  • Provide complete container closure integrity test (CCIT) method validation results for the proposed dye ingress method, including validation for precision (repeatability, intermediate precision, and reproducibility) and robustness.
  • Provide additional data and/or information to support that the commercial manufacturing process is capable of manufacturing IMAB362 drug product reproducibly.
  • Review labeling review resources on the Prescription Drug Labeling Resources and Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule websites.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name, VYLOY, when all application deficiencies identified in this letter have been addressed.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b) when responding to deficiencies.
  • Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile in the safety update.
  • Present new safety data from studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication using the same format as in the original submission.

Deficiency summary

The application received a Complete Response Letter due to significant deficiencies in Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) related to container closure integrity test (CCIT) method validation and manufacturing reproducibility. Additionally, extensive requirements for a comprehensive safety update, including detailed adverse event reporting and worldwide safety experience, were identified. The proprietary name is conditionally acceptable pending resolution of all other deficiencies.

Findings

Incomplete Container Closure Integrity Test (CCIT) Method Validation

Severity: major

The non-compendial CCIT method used for drug product stability testing was validated for specificity and detection limit but lacks validation for precision (repeatability, intermediate precision, and reproducibility) and robustness. Complete validation results for the proposed dye ingress method are required.

Recommended response: Conduct full validation studies for the CCIT method, including precision and robustness, as per FDA guidance. Update relevant sections of the BLA with complete validation results.

Cited: FDA Guidance for Industry: Analytical Procedures and Methods Validation for Drugs and Biologics, 2015

Lack of Data for Manufacturing Reproducibility

Severity: major

Additional data and/or information are required to support that the manufacturing process is capable of producing IMAB362 drug product reproducibly.

Recommended response: Provide comprehensive data demonstrating manufacturing process reproducibility, potentially including process validation data, batch consistency data, and relevant statistical analyses.

Proprietary Name Resubmission Contingent on Deficiency Resolution

Severity: minor

The proposed proprietary name, VYLOY, was conditionally acceptable pending approval. Resubmission of the proprietary name is required only after all application deficiencies identified in this letter have been addressed.

Recommended response: Focus on resolving all other deficiencies first. Once resolved, resubmit the proprietary name proposal.

Incomplete Safety Update

Severity: major

A comprehensive safety update is required as described in 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), including data from all nonclinical and clinical studies/trials. This involves detailing significant changes, presenting new and combined safety data, comparing frequencies of adverse events, providing separate tables for other indications, narrative summaries for deaths and serious adverse events, updated exposure information, and a summary of worldwide safety experience.

Recommended response: Compile and present a complete safety update following the detailed requirements of 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), ensuring all new and existing safety data are integrated and analyzed.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)

Insufficient Detail in Adverse Event Reporting

Severity: major

Provide case report forms and narrative summaries for each subject who died or discontinued due to an adverse event during clinical trials. Additionally, provide narrative summaries for all serious adverse events.

Recommended response: Extract and compile detailed case report forms and narrative summaries for all specified adverse events and deaths, ensuring thorough documentation.

Outdated Clinical Exposure Information

Severity: minor

Provide updated exposure information for the clinical studies/trials, including details such as the number of subjects and person-time.

Recommended response: Update all relevant clinical study reports and summaries with the most current exposure data.

Missing Worldwide Safety Experience Summary

Severity: major

Provide a summary of worldwide experience on the safety of this drug, including an updated estimate of use for the drug marketed in other countries.

Recommended response: Gather and summarize all available worldwide safety data, including post-marketing experience and usage estimates from other countries.

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
BLA

Impact

Impact score
0.75
Estimated delay
545 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The primary themes are significant CMC deficiencies related to manufacturing reproducibility and method validation, and extensive requirements for a comprehensive safety update, indicating a need for more robust data and analysis across both quality and clinical domains to ensure product quality and patient safety.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 25%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…