Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesCRLComplete Response Letter

Complete Response Letter BLA 761147 (Aug 5, 2025)

Issued August 5, 2025

Issued

August 5, 2025

Application

BLA • 761147

Review center

CBER

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Complete Response Letter

Response due August 5, 2026Requires resubmission addressing deficiencies.

Summary

This document is a letter from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to an applicant regarding Biologics License Application (BLA) 761147. It outlines deficiencies in the application, provides guidance on labeling resources, addresses the proprietary name, and details extensive requirements for a safety update that must be included in the resubmission.

Key points

  • Review FDA Prescription Drug Labeling Resources, Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule websites, and the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI) checklist.
  • Review the FDA guidance for industry Labeling for Biosimilar Products.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name when responding to all application deficiencies.
  • Include a safety update when responding to deficiencies.
  • The safety update must include data from all nonclinical and clinical studies of the product, regardless of indication, dosage form, or dose level.
  • Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile and their relevance to clinically meaningful differences between the proposed biosimilar product and the U.S.-licensed reference product.
  • Incorporate new safety data into sections describing discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, and common adverse events.
  • Present new safety data from clinical studies for the proposed indication using the same format as the original BLA submission.

Cited reasons

  • Proprietary Name Resubmission Contingent on Application Approval
  • Inadequate Comprehensive Safety Update Submission
  • Insufficient Integration and Presentation of New Safety Data
  • Incomplete Retabulation of Study Discontinuations
  • Missing Case Report Forms and Narrative Summaries for Deaths and Serious Adverse Events
  • Insufficient Analysis of Changes in Common Adverse Events
  • Outdated Clinical Study Exposure Information
  • Lack of Comprehensive Worldwide Safety Experience Summary

Recommended actions

  • Review FDA Prescription Drug Labeling Resources, Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule websites, and the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI) checklist.
  • Review the FDA guidance for industry Labeling for Biosimilar Products.
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name when responding to all application deficiencies.
  • Include a safety update when responding to deficiencies.
  • The safety update must include data from all nonclinical and clinical studies of the product, regardless of indication, dosage form, or dose level.
  • Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile and their relevance to clinically meaningful differences between the proposed biosimilar product and the U.S.-licensed reference product.
  • Incorporate new safety data into sections describing discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, and common adverse events.
  • Present new safety data from clinical studies for the proposed indication using the same format as the original BLA submission.

Deficiency summary

The application received a Complete Response Letter primarily due to significant deficiencies in the clinical safety data update, including inadequate integration and presentation of new safety information, missing case report forms and narrative summaries for serious adverse events and deaths, and a lack of comprehensive worldwide safety experience. Additionally, updated exposure information and English translations of foreign labeling are required. The proprietary name resubmission is contingent upon addressing all other deficiencies.

Findings

Proprietary Name Resubmission Contingent on Application Approval

Severity: info

The proposed proprietary name was found conditionally acceptable but requires resubmission after all application deficiencies are addressed.

Recommended response: Resubmit the proprietary name application once all other deficiencies are fully resolved and the application is ready for re-submission.

Inadequate Comprehensive Safety Update Submission

Severity: major

A comprehensive safety update is required, including data from all nonclinical and clinical studies, regardless of indication, dosage, or dose level. This update must describe significant changes in the safety profile and their relevance, if any, to whether there may be clinically meaningful differences between the proposed biosimilar product and the U.S.-licensed reference product.

Recommended response: Compile and submit a complete safety update, ensuring all relevant nonclinical and clinical data are included and analyzed for significant changes and biosimilarity relevance.

Insufficient Integration and Presentation of New Safety Data

Severity: major

New safety data from clinical studies must be incorporated into sections describing discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, and common adverse events. This includes presenting new data in the same format as the original BLA, tabulating new data combined with original BLA data, and comparing frequencies of adverse events.

Recommended response: Re-analyze and re-present all safety data, ensuring new clinical study data is fully integrated, tabulated, and compared with original BLA data according to specified formats.

Incomplete Retabulation of Study Discontinuations

Severity: major

A retabulation of reasons for premature study discontinuation, incorporating drop-outs from newly completed studies, is required. Any new trends or patterns identified must be described.

Recommended response: Update the analysis of premature study discontinuations, including all new data, and provide a detailed description of any emerging trends.

Missing Case Report Forms and Narrative Summaries for Deaths and Serious Adverse Events

Severity: critical

Case report forms and narrative summaries are required for each subject who died during a clinical study or discontinued due to an adverse event. Narrative summaries for all serious adverse events are also needed.

Recommended response: Immediately compile and submit all missing case report forms and narrative summaries for deaths and serious adverse events, ensuring completeness and accuracy.

Insufficient Analysis of Changes in Common Adverse Events

Severity: major

Information suggesting a substantial change in the incidence of common, but less serious, adverse events between new data and original BLA data must be described.

Recommended response: Conduct a thorough comparative analysis of common adverse event incidence between new and original data, highlighting and explaining any substantial changes.

Outdated Clinical Study Exposure Information

Severity: major

Updated exposure information for the clinical studies (e.g., number of subjects, person time) is required.

Recommended response: Provide a complete and updated summary of clinical study exposure data, including all relevant metrics.

Lack of Comprehensive Worldwide Safety Experience Summary

Severity: major

A summary of worldwide experience on the safety of this product, including known adverse events and immunogenicity, is required. An updated estimate of use for the product marketed in other countries must also be included.

Recommended response: Compile and submit a comprehensive summary of worldwide safety data, including adverse events, immunogenicity, and updated usage estimates from all countries where the product is marketed.

Missing English Translations of Approved Foreign Labeling

Severity: major

English translations of current approved foreign labeling not previously submitted are required.

Recommended response: Provide certified English translations for all approved foreign labeling that has not yet been submitted to the agency.

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
BLA

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
365 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The application's primary hurdle is the inadequacy and incompleteness of clinical safety data, particularly regarding updates, detailed adverse event reporting, and global safety experience. Labeling compliance with foreign translations is also a key issue.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…