Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesCRLComplete Response Letter

Complete Response Letter BLA 761266 (Jan 3, 2025)

Issued January 3, 2025

Issued

January 3, 2025

Application

BLA • 761266

Review center

CBER

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Complete Response Letter

Response due April 3, 2025Requires resubmission addressing deficiencies.

Summary

This document outlines specific requirements and recommendations for a Biologics License Application (BLA) for a biosimilar product, focusing on the submission of updated safety data, labeling information, and proprietary name details. It emphasizes compliance with FDA regulations and guidance for biosimilar products.

Key points

  • Compare the proposed biosimilar product with the U.S.-licensed reference product.
  • Incorporate new safety data into sections describing discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, and common adverse events.
  • Present new safety data from clinical studies for the proposed indication using the same format as the original BLA submission.
  • Present tabulations of the new safety data combined with the original BLA data.
  • Include tables that compare frequencies of adverse events in the original BLA with the retabulated frequencies.
  • Present a retabulation of the reasons for premature study discontinuation by incorporating drop-outs from newly completed studies.
  • Describe any new trends or patterns identified in premature study discontinuation.
  • Provide case report forms and narrative summaries for each subject who died during a clinical study or who did not complete a study because of an adverse event.

Cited reasons

  • Inadequate Clinical Safety Data Presentation and Retabulation
  • Missing Case Report Forms and Narrative Summaries for Deaths and Serious Adverse Events
  • Insufficient Updated Clinical Exposure Information
  • Incomplete Worldwide Safety Experience Summary
  • Missing English Translations of Approved Foreign Labeling
  • Non-compliant Prescribing Information (PI)
  • Non-compliant Carton and Container Labeling
  • Proprietary Name Requires Resubmission

Recommended actions

  • Compare the proposed biosimilar product with the U.S.-licensed reference product.
  • Incorporate new safety data into sections describing discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, and common adverse events.
  • Present new safety data from clinical studies for the proposed indication using the same format as the original BLA submission.
  • Present tabulations of the new safety data combined with the original BLA data.
  • Include tables that compare frequencies of adverse events in the original BLA with the retabulated frequencies.
  • Present a retabulation of the reasons for premature study discontinuation by incorporating drop-outs from newly completed studies.
  • Describe any new trends or patterns identified in premature study discontinuation.
  • Provide case report forms and narrative summaries for each subject who died during a clinical study or who did not complete a study because of an adverse event.

Deficiency summary

The FDA issued a Complete Response Letter for BLA 761266, citing significant deficiencies primarily related to clinical safety data presentation, comprehensive safety reporting (including worldwide experience and adverse event narratives), and multiple aspects of product labeling (Prescribing Information, carton/container, and proprietary name). The agency requires updated and reformatted clinical safety data, detailed adverse event narratives, English translations of foreign labeling, and revised labeling conforming to regulatory requirements and guidances. The proprietary name is conditionally acceptable pending resolution of all application deficiencies.

Findings

Inadequate Clinical Safety Data Presentation and Retabulation

Severity: major

The submission requires new safety data from clinical studies for the proposed indication to be presented in the same format as the original BLA, combined with original BLA data, and compared in tables. A retabulation of reasons for premature study discontinuation, incorporating new drop-outs, is also required, with new trends identified.

Recommended response: Reformat and retabulate all clinical safety data, ensuring consistency with original BLA format, and provide comparative analyses.

Missing Case Report Forms and Narrative Summaries for Deaths and Serious Adverse Events

Severity: critical

Provide case report forms and narrative summaries for all subjects who died during clinical studies or discontinued due to an adverse event. Additionally, provide narrative summaries for all serious adverse events.

Recommended response: Compile and submit all requested case report forms and detailed narrative summaries for deaths and serious adverse events.

Insufficient Updated Clinical Exposure Information

Severity: major

Provide updated exposure information for the clinical studies, including the number of subjects and person-time.

Recommended response: Update and submit comprehensive clinical exposure data.

Incomplete Worldwide Safety Experience Summary

Severity: major

Provide a summary of worldwide experience on the safety of the product, including known adverse events, immunogenicity, and an updated estimate of use in other countries where marketed.

Recommended response: Compile and submit a comprehensive summary of worldwide safety data and product usage.

Missing English Translations of Approved Foreign Labeling

Severity: major

Provide English translations of current approved foreign labeling not previously submitted.

Recommended response: Obtain and submit certified English translations for all relevant foreign labeling.

Non-compliant Prescribing Information (PI)

Severity: major

Submit draft labeling responsive to previous electronic communication. Correct formatting errors using the SRPI checklist to ensure conformance with regulations and guidances. Submit updated content of labeling in SPL format [21 CFR 601.14(b)]. The proposed PI must conform to 21 CFR 201.56(a) and (d) and 201.57. Provide a highlighted/marked-up copy and a clean Word version.

Recommended response: Revise the Prescribing Information to meet all cited regulatory requirements and formatting guidelines, including SPL format, and provide both marked-up and clean versions.

Cited: 21 CFR 601.14(b), 21 CFR 201.56(a), 21 CFR 201.56(d), 21 CFR 201.57

Non-compliant Carton and Container Labeling

Severity: major

Submit draft carton and container labeling based on the previous submission date.

Recommended response: Revise and submit updated carton and container labeling.

Proprietary Name Requires Resubmission

Severity: minor

The proposed proprietary name was found conditionally acceptable pending approval of the application. It must be resubmitted when all application deficiencies are resolved.

Recommended response: Resubmit the proprietary name proposal after all other deficiencies have been addressed and the application is ready for re-review.

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
BLA

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
180 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The primary themes of the Complete Response Letter are the need for comprehensive and properly formatted clinical safety data, including detailed adverse event reporting and worldwide experience, and significant revisions to all aspects of product labeling to ensure regulatory compliance and clarity.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…