Inadequate Scientific Bridge and Clinical Literature Justification
Severity: majorThe application failed to establish an adequate scientific bridge between Nutrilipid 20% and Intralipid 20% to justify reliance on published literature for LAST treatment, citing statistically significant physicochemical differences and insufficient justification for their in vivo performance impact. The clinical summaries also lacked detailed methodology for literature search strategies and justification for the applicability of external data.
Recommended response: Provide additional comparative data (e.g., drug capture capability) and robust justification for physicochemical differences not affecting in vivo performance. Detail the clinical literature search methodology, including databases, search strings, terms, dates, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and rationale for applicability of external data.
Human Factors Deficiencies and Risk of Medication Errors
Severity: majorThe human factors validation study revealed several use errors and difficulties with critical tasks, indicating the proposed user interface does not support safe and effective use. Root causes included issues with infusion pump experience, dose calculation, high cognitive load, and confusion with Instructions for Use (IFU) and LAST Management Flow Process, necessitating additional risk controls.
Recommended response: Develop and implement additional risk controls, including device design modifications and relevant labels/labeling changes, to address identified use issues and reduce the risk of associated medication errors.
Deficiencies in Clinical Safety Data Presentation
Severity: majorThe submission requires comprehensive updates and retabulations of safety data from new studies, combined with original application data. Specific requests include separate tables for adverse events for indications other than the proposed one, case report forms and narrative summaries for deaths and serious adverse events, and updated exposure information for clinical studies.
Recommended response: Provide comprehensive, updated safety data presentations, including combined tabulations, separate AE tables for other indications, and detailed case report forms/narrative summaries for critical safety events.
Insufficient Benefit-Risk Justification for LAST Treatment, especially in Pediatric Patients
Severity: majorAdditional data and justification are required to support the benefit-risk profile of the therapy for non-life-threatening signs and symptoms of LAST, particularly in pediatric patients. The adequacy of published literature to support safety and effectiveness for pediatric LAST treatment is deferred until the scientific bridge is established, and current evidence is limited for non-life-threatening cases.
Recommended response: Provide additional data and robust justification for the benefit-risk profile, especially for non-life-threatening LAST and pediatric populations, considering the specific local anesthetics intended for the indication.
Discrepancies in Proposed Labeling and Indication Statement
Severity: minorDiscrepancies were noted in the proposed prescribing information regarding the indication statement (e.g., 'treatment' vs. 'adjunctive treatment') and the specific local anesthetic agents listed, requiring clarification and consistency across labeling documents.
Recommended response: Address discrepancies in the proposed indication statement and ensure consistency across all labeling documents. Review labeling against FDA resources and guidance, specifically regarding SPL format.
Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)