Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesCRLComplete Response Letter

Complete Response Letter NDA 505b1 217382 (Jun 2, 2025)

Issued June 2, 2025

Issued

June 2, 2025

Application

NDA 505b1 • 217382

Review center

CDER

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Complete Response Letter

Response due June 2, 2026Requires resubmission addressing deficiencies.

Summary

The FDA has issued a deficiency letter for NDA 217382 concerning Nutrilipid 20%. Key issues include the lack of an adequate scientific bridge between Nutrilipid 20% and Intralipid 20% due to statistically significant physicochemical differences and insufficient data on comparable drug capture capability. The application also has deficiencies in human factors validation studies, indicating unsafe user interface for critical tasks. The FDA reserves comment on proposed labeling until other issues are resolved and requests comprehensive updates to safety data, benefit-risk assessments, and clarification on the proposed indication, especially for pediatric use and non-life-threatening Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity (LAST).

Key points

  • Provide additional data demonstrating comparable drug capture capability between Nutrilipid 20% and Intralipid 20% to establish a scientific bridge for the proposed indication.
  • Provide justification as to why physicochemical differences between Nutrilipid 20% and Intralipid 20% do not affect the in vivo performance of the drug product for LAST treatment.
  • Provide justification to support the applicability of safety and effectiveness data from other lipid formulations or Intralipid concentrations to Nutrilipid 20%.
  • Provide detailed information regarding the published literature search strategy and methods in clinical summaries, including databases, search strings, terms, fields, dates, and inclusion/exclusion criteria.
  • Provide justification for the chosen search strategy and dates.
  • Provide justification for the selection and exclusion of literature references in safety and efficacy assessments, particularly for cases where lipid emulsion was not efficacious.
  • Describe methods used to evaluate for duplication of case reports.
  • Develop and implement additional risk controls, including device design and labeling, to address identified use errors and difficulties from the human factors validation study.

Cited reasons

  • Inadequate Scientific Bridge and Clinical Literature Justification
  • Human Factors Deficiencies and Risk of Medication Errors
  • Deficiencies in Clinical Safety Data Presentation
  • Insufficient Benefit-Risk Justification for LAST Treatment, especially in Pediatric Patients
  • Discrepancies in Proposed Labeling and Indication Statement
  • The FDA issued a Complete Response Letter for Nutrilipid 20% primarily due to the lack of a robust scientific bridge between Nutrilipid 20% and Intralipid 20% to support reliance on published literature for Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity (LAST) treatment. Significant human factors deficiencies were identified, indicating the proposed user interface does not support safe use and requires additional risk controls. Furthermore, the application requires comprehensive updates to clinical safety data presentation and a more thorough justification of the benefit-risk profile, especially for non-life-threatening LAST and pediatric populations. Minor labeling discrepancies were also noted.

Recommended actions

  • Provide additional data demonstrating comparable drug capture capability between Nutrilipid 20% and Intralipid 20% to establish a scientific bridge for the proposed indication.
  • Provide justification as to why physicochemical differences between Nutrilipid 20% and Intralipid 20% do not affect the in vivo performance of the drug product for LAST treatment.
  • Provide justification to support the applicability of safety and effectiveness data from other lipid formulations or Intralipid concentrations to Nutrilipid 20%.
  • Provide detailed information regarding the published literature search strategy and methods in clinical summaries, including databases, search strings, terms, fields, dates, and inclusion/exclusion criteria.
  • Provide justification for the chosen search strategy and dates.
  • Provide justification for the selection and exclusion of literature references in safety and efficacy assessments, particularly for cases where lipid emulsion was not efficacious.
  • Describe methods used to evaluate for duplication of case reports.
  • Develop and implement additional risk controls, including device design and labeling, to address identified use errors and difficulties from the human factors validation study.

Deficiency summary

The FDA issued a Complete Response Letter for Nutrilipid 20% primarily due to the lack of a robust scientific bridge between Nutrilipid 20% and Intralipid 20% to support reliance on published literature for Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity (LAST) treatment. Significant human factors deficiencies were identified, indicating the proposed user interface does not support safe use and requires additional risk controls. Furthermore, the application requires comprehensive updates to clinical safety data presentation and a more thorough justification of the benefit-risk profile, especially for non-life-threatening LAST and pediatric populations. Minor labeling discrepancies were also noted.

Findings

Inadequate Scientific Bridge and Clinical Literature Justification

Severity: major

The application failed to establish an adequate scientific bridge between Nutrilipid 20% and Intralipid 20% to justify reliance on published literature for LAST treatment, citing statistically significant physicochemical differences and insufficient justification for their in vivo performance impact. The clinical summaries also lacked detailed methodology for literature search strategies and justification for the applicability of external data.

Recommended response: Provide additional comparative data (e.g., drug capture capability) and robust justification for physicochemical differences not affecting in vivo performance. Detail the clinical literature search methodology, including databases, search strings, terms, dates, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and rationale for applicability of external data.

Human Factors Deficiencies and Risk of Medication Errors

Severity: major

The human factors validation study revealed several use errors and difficulties with critical tasks, indicating the proposed user interface does not support safe and effective use. Root causes included issues with infusion pump experience, dose calculation, high cognitive load, and confusion with Instructions for Use (IFU) and LAST Management Flow Process, necessitating additional risk controls.

Recommended response: Develop and implement additional risk controls, including device design modifications and relevant labels/labeling changes, to address identified use issues and reduce the risk of associated medication errors.

Deficiencies in Clinical Safety Data Presentation

Severity: major

The submission requires comprehensive updates and retabulations of safety data from new studies, combined with original application data. Specific requests include separate tables for adverse events for indications other than the proposed one, case report forms and narrative summaries for deaths and serious adverse events, and updated exposure information for clinical studies.

Recommended response: Provide comprehensive, updated safety data presentations, including combined tabulations, separate AE tables for other indications, and detailed case report forms/narrative summaries for critical safety events.

Insufficient Benefit-Risk Justification for LAST Treatment, especially in Pediatric Patients

Severity: major

Additional data and justification are required to support the benefit-risk profile of the therapy for non-life-threatening signs and symptoms of LAST, particularly in pediatric patients. The adequacy of published literature to support safety and effectiveness for pediatric LAST treatment is deferred until the scientific bridge is established, and current evidence is limited for non-life-threatening cases.

Recommended response: Provide additional data and robust justification for the benefit-risk profile, especially for non-life-threatening LAST and pediatric populations, considering the specific local anesthetics intended for the indication.

Discrepancies in Proposed Labeling and Indication Statement

Severity: minor

Discrepancies were noted in the proposed prescribing information regarding the indication statement (e.g., 'treatment' vs. 'adjunctive treatment') and the specific local anesthetic agents listed, requiring clarification and consistency across labeling documents.

Recommended response: Address discrepancies in the proposed indication statement and ensure consistency across all labeling documents. Review labeling against FDA resources and guidance, specifically regarding SPL format.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
NDA

Impact

Impact score
0.75
Estimated delay
270 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The Complete Response Letter highlights critical gaps in demonstrating product comparability, ensuring user safety through human factors, and providing adequate clinical data and benefit-risk justification, particularly for vulnerable populations. Labeling consistency also requires attention.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 25%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…