Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesCRLComplete Response Letter

Complete Response Letter NDA 505b1 218258 (Jan 23, 2024)

Issued January 23, 2024

Issued

January 23, 2024

Application

NDA 505b1 • 218258

Review center

CDER

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Complete Response Letter

Response due January 22, 2025Requires resubmission addressing deficiencies.

Summary

This is a Complete Response Letter from the FDA to Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. for New Drug Application (NDA) 218258 for phenobarbital sodium injection. The FDA has determined that the application cannot be approved in its present form due to deficiencies in clinical data, abuse potential assessment, facility inspections, and other areas, and provides recommendations for addressing these issues.

Key points

  • Provide analyzable efficacy and safety datasets for independent FDA review, specifically for the NEOLEV2 study.
  • Discuss the contents and formats of the efficacy and safety information derived from the NEOLEV2 study with the FDA before resubmission.
  • Provide a detailed summary of the abuse potential and dependence liability of phenobarbital to support the scheduling proposal.
  • Include all abuse-related data for phenobarbital and other barbiturates, including epidemiological data, to support the proposed scheduling.
  • Ensure the abuse potential assessment provides cross-linkage to all other eCTD sections supporting conclusions.
  • If relying on the Agency’s prior findings for Sezaby, establish scientific appropriateness and provide appropriate patent certification or statement for each listed drug.
  • Review labeling review resources, including regulations, guidance documents, and the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI) checklist.
  • If revising labeling, use the SRPI checklist to ensure conformity with format items.

Cited reasons

  • Insufficient Analyzable Efficacy and Safety Datasets
  • Inadequate Abuse Potential Assessment
  • Unresolved Manufacturing Facility Inspection Observations
  • Required Safety Update for Resubmission
  • Biowaiver Request Contingent on Efficacy/Safety
  • Labeling Comments Reserved
  • The application for phenobarbital sodium injection received a Complete Response Letter due to insufficient analyzable efficacy and safety data, an inadequate abuse potential assessment, and unresolved manufacturing facility inspection observations. Labeling comments are reserved until these primary issues are addressed.

Recommended actions

  • Provide analyzable efficacy and safety datasets for independent FDA review, specifically for the NEOLEV2 study.
  • Discuss the contents and formats of the efficacy and safety information derived from the NEOLEV2 study with the FDA before resubmission.
  • Provide a detailed summary of the abuse potential and dependence liability of phenobarbital to support the scheduling proposal.
  • Include all abuse-related data for phenobarbital and other barbiturates, including epidemiological data, to support the proposed scheduling.
  • Ensure the abuse potential assessment provides cross-linkage to all other eCTD sections supporting conclusions.
  • If relying on the Agency’s prior findings for Sezaby, establish scientific appropriateness and provide appropriate patent certification or statement for each listed drug.
  • Review labeling review resources, including regulations, guidance documents, and the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI) checklist.
  • If revising labeling, use the SRPI checklist to ensure conformity with format items.

Deficiency summary

The application for phenobarbital sodium injection received a Complete Response Letter due to insufficient analyzable efficacy and safety data, an inadequate abuse potential assessment, and unresolved manufacturing facility inspection observations. Labeling comments are reserved until these primary issues are addressed.

Findings

Insufficient Analyzable Efficacy and Safety Datasets

Severity: critical

The application does not provide analyzable efficacy and safety datasets which would allow for independent review by the FDA. The key supporting reference (NEOLEV2 publication) lacks sufficiently detailed presentation of efficacy and safety data for independent analysis, preventing conclusions on effectiveness and safety. Preliminary assessment of a later amendment also identified deficiencies.

Recommended response: Sponsor must provide complete, analyzable efficacy and safety datasets, including raw data and detailed methodology, to allow for independent FDA verification of results. Engage in pre-resubmission discussions with the agency regarding data content and format.

Inadequate Abuse Potential Assessment

Severity: major

The abuse potential assessment needs to provide a detailed summary of phenobarbital's abuse potential and dependence liability, including all abuse-related data for phenobarbital and other barbiturates (e.g., epidemiological data). Cross-linkage to all other eCTD sections supporting conclusions is required. If relying on Sezaby, establish scientific appropriateness and provide patent certification/statement.

Recommended response: Revise the abuse potential assessment to include comprehensive data on phenobarbital and other barbiturates, ensuring proper cross-referencing within the eCTD. If relying on a listed drug, provide scientific justification and patent certification.

Unresolved Manufacturing Facility Inspection Observations

Severity: critical

Following pre-approval inspection of the manufacturing facility, FDA conveyed deficiencies. Satisfactory resolution of these observations is required before this NDA may be approved.

Recommended response: Address all deficiencies identified during the pre-approval inspection of the manufacturing facility and provide documentation of satisfactory resolution to the agency.

Required Safety Update for Resubmission

Severity: major

When responding to deficiencies, include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b). This includes describing significant changes, presenting new safety data, combining with original data, comparing frequencies, providing separate tables for other indications, retabulating premature discontinuations, providing case report forms/narratives for deaths/serious AEs, describing changes in common AEs, updating exposure information, summarizing worldwide experience, and providing English translations of foreign labeling.

Recommended response: Prepare a comprehensive safety update in accordance with 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), incorporating all new safety data, updated analyses, and required documentation for all clinical studies.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)

Biowaiver Request Contingent on Efficacy/Safety

Severity: info

The FDA’s recommendation on the approvability of your biowaiver request for the proposed Phenobarbital Sodium Injection 90 mg/mL is contingent on the submission of adequate and acceptable information/data showing evidence of acceptable safety and efficacy findings in the target patient population for the proposed indication. This is an additional comment and not an approvability issue.

Recommended response: Note that the biowaiver approval is dependent on resolving the primary clinical efficacy and safety deficiencies. No immediate action on the biowaiver itself is required until clinical data is sufficient.

Labeling Comments Reserved

Severity: info

FDA reserves comment on the proposed labeling until the application is otherwise adequate. The agency encourages review of labeling review resources and use of the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI) checklist.

Recommended response: Review FDA labeling resources and the SRPI checklist in preparation for future labeling revisions once clinical and manufacturing deficiencies are resolved.

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
505(b)(2)

Impact

Impact score
0.95
Estimated delay
365 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The primary issues preventing approval are the lack of independently verifiable clinical efficacy and safety data, an incomplete abuse potential assessment, and outstanding manufacturing quality concerns. Resolution of these core issues is required before the application can be reconsidered.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 5%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…