Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesCRLComplete Response Letter

Complete Response Letter NDA 505b1 218923 (Oct 10, 2024)

Issued October 10, 2024

Issued

October 10, 2024

Application

NDA 505b1 • 218923

Review center

CDER

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Complete Response Letter

Response due October 10, 2025Requires resubmission addressing deficiencies.

Summary

This FDA letter communicates deficiencies in NDA 218923, deferring clinical inspections and reserving comments on labeling and proprietary name until the application is otherwise adequate. It outlines specific requirements for a safety update, including detailed data presentation and analysis, and provides instructions for resubmission within one year, emphasizing that all deficiencies must be addressed.

Key points

  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name when responding to application deficiencies.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b) when responding to deficiencies.
  • Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile within the safety update.
  • Incorporate new safety data into sections describing discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, and common adverse events.
  • Present new safety data from studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication using the same format as the original submission.
  • Present tabulations of new safety data combined with original application data.
  • Include tables comparing frequencies of adverse events in the original application with retabulated frequencies.
  • Provide separate tables for frequencies of adverse events occurring in clinical trials for indications other than the proposed indication.

Cited reasons

  • Resubmission of Proprietary Name Required
  • Inadequate Comprehensive Safety Update
  • Deficiencies in Clinical Safety Data Presentation and Analysis
  • Missing Case Report Forms and Narrative Summaries for Adverse Events
  • Inadequate Updated Clinical Exposure Information
  • Absence of Worldwide Safety Experience Summary
  • Missing English Translations of Approved Foreign Labeling
  • Deferred Office of Study Integrity and Surveillance (OSIS) Inspections

Recommended actions

  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name when responding to application deficiencies.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b) when responding to deficiencies.
  • Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile within the safety update.
  • Incorporate new safety data into sections describing discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, and common adverse events.
  • Present new safety data from studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication using the same format as the original submission.
  • Present tabulations of new safety data combined with original application data.
  • Include tables comparing frequencies of adverse events in the original application with retabulated frequencies.
  • Provide separate tables for frequencies of adverse events occurring in clinical trials for indications other than the proposed indication.

Deficiency summary

The FDA issued a Complete Response Letter for NDA 218923 primarily due to significant deficiencies in the clinical safety data package. Key issues include the need for a comprehensive safety update as per 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), inadequate presentation and analysis of new and existing clinical safety data, missing case report forms and narrative summaries for adverse events, and a lack of worldwide safety experience summary. Additionally, updated clinical exposure information and English translations of foreign labeling are required. The proprietary name, though conditionally acceptable, needs resubmission. Clinical inspections were deferred due to travel restrictions.

Findings

Resubmission of Proprietary Name Required

Severity: minor

The proposed proprietary name was found conditionally acceptable but requires resubmission concurrently with the response to other application deficiencies.

Recommended response: Resubmit the proprietary name application along with the complete response to address all identified deficiencies.

Inadequate Comprehensive Safety Update

Severity: major

A comprehensive safety update is required, including data from all nonclinical and clinical studies/trials of the drug under consideration, regardless of indication, dosage form, or dose level, as described in 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b).

Recommended response: Compile and submit a complete safety update covering all relevant nonclinical and clinical data, ensuring full compliance with 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b).

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)

Deficiencies in Clinical Safety Data Presentation and Analysis

Severity: major

The submission lacks detailed descriptions of significant safety profile changes, proper presentation of new safety data (including combined tabulations and comparisons with original data), separate tables for adverse events in non-proposed indications, and retabulation of premature trial discontinuations with trend analysis. Additionally, changes in the incidence of common, less serious adverse events between new and original data must be described.

Recommended response: Conduct a thorough re-analysis and re-presentation of all clinical safety data, ensuring new data is integrated, compared, and presented clearly, addressing all specific requests for tabulations and trend analyses.

Missing Case Report Forms and Narrative Summaries for Adverse Events

Severity: major

Case report forms and narrative summaries are required for all subjects who died during a clinical trial or who did not complete a trial due to an adverse event. Narrative summaries for all serious adverse events are also required.

Recommended response: Collect and submit all requested case report forms and narrative summaries for deaths, discontinuations due to adverse events, and all serious adverse events.

Inadequate Updated Clinical Exposure Information

Severity: major

Updated exposure information for the clinical studies/trials, including the number of subjects and person-time, is required.

Recommended response: Provide comprehensive and updated exposure information for all clinical trials.

Absence of Worldwide Safety Experience Summary

Severity: major

A summary of worldwide experience on the safety of the drug, including an updated estimate of use for the drug marketed in other countries, is required.

Recommended response: Compile and submit a detailed summary of worldwide safety experience, including usage estimates from all countries where the drug is marketed.

Missing English Translations of Approved Foreign Labeling

Severity: major

English translations of all current approved foreign labeling not previously submitted are required.

Recommended response: Obtain and submit English translations for all current approved foreign labeling that has not yet been provided.

Deferred Office of Study Integrity and Surveillance (OSIS) Inspections

Severity: info

OSIS inspections were deferred during this review cycle due to travel restrictions and will be conducted upon resubmission. This is an informational note from the agency, not a deficiency requiring direct action by the sponsor, but it indicates a pending regulatory activity.

Recommended response: Prepare for potential OSIS inspections upon resubmission by ensuring all clinical site documentation and data are readily available and auditable.

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
NDA

Impact

Impact score
0.75
Estimated delay
545 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The primary themes of this Complete Response Letter are the critical need for a robust and comprehensively presented clinical safety data package, including detailed adverse event reporting and global safety experience. There are also significant data integrity and documentation gaps related to clinical trials and administrative requirements for labeling. The deferral of inspections indicates that even if data issues are resolved, further regulatory scrutiny is pending.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 25%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…