Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesCRLComplete Response Letter

Complete Response Letter NDA 505b1 219195 (Nov 27, 2024)

Issued November 27, 2024

Issued

November 27, 2024

Application

NDA 505b1 • 219195

Review center

CDER

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Complete Response Letter

Response due November 27, 2025Requires resubmission addressing deficiencies.

Summary

The FDA has identified significant deficiencies in NDA 219195 for govorestat, concluding that the currently available evidence does not support the drug's effectiveness for treating CG, nor does it validate plasma galactitol as a reasonably likely surrogate endpoint for accelerated approval. The agency requires substantial evidence of effectiveness, including new adequate and well-controlled clinical trials, and comprehensive data to support galactitol's role as a surrogate endpoint.

Key points

  • Provide substantial evidence of effectiveness for govorestat for the treatment of CG.
  • Conduct at least one new adequate and well-controlled trial demonstrating an effect of govorestat on clinically meaningful endpoint(s) in subjects with CG.
  • If demonstrating effectiveness with one trial plus confirmatory evidence, consider conducting a well-designed and adequately powered nonclinical efficacy study in an animal model of CG demonstrating a robust effect of govorestat treatment at human-relevant exposures, assessed using validated assays, on clinically relevant neurobehavioral outcomes, histopathology, and metabolic markers of CG.
  • Consider evaluation of a clinically relevant functional endpoint(s) in studies.
  • Provide strong mechanistic evidence for the role of galactitol as the major mediator in the pathogenesis of the neurobehavioral symptoms of CG for accelerated approval consideration.
  • Adequately and comprehensively address evidence from published literature regarding plausible alternative toxic metabolites/pathophysiologic mechanisms of disease.
  • Determine and provide evidence to support a galactitol reduction response threshold that would be reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit.
  • For accelerated approval, provide substantial evidence of effectiveness of govorestat on the reasonably likely surrogate endpoint (RLSE) based on adequate and well-controlled clinical investigation(s) and confirmatory evidence, if a single trial is primary evidence.

Cited reasons

  • Lack of Substantial Evidence of Effectiveness from Clinical Trial
  • Inadequate Confirmatory Evidence and Issues with Reasonably Likely Surrogate Endpoint (RLSE)
  • Proprietary Name Resubmission Required
  • Safety Update Required
  • The application lacks substantial evidence of effectiveness for govorestat for the treatment of CG, primarily due to the failure of the pivotal clinical trial to meet statistical significance and significant data quality issues. Additionally, the evidence provided is insufficient to support plasma galactitol as a reasonably likely surrogate endpoint for accelerated approval, with nonclinical studies exhibiting technical limitations and design flaws. Procedural requirements for proprietary name resubmission and a safety update are also noted.

Recommended actions

  • Provide substantial evidence of effectiveness for govorestat for the treatment of CG.
  • Conduct at least one new adequate and well-controlled trial demonstrating an effect of govorestat on clinically meaningful endpoint(s) in subjects with CG.
  • If demonstrating effectiveness with one trial plus confirmatory evidence, consider conducting a well-designed and adequately powered nonclinical efficacy study in an animal model of CG demonstrating a robust effect of govorestat treatment at human-relevant exposures, assessed using validated assays, on clinically relevant neurobehavioral outcomes, histopathology, and metabolic markers of CG.
  • Consider evaluation of a clinically relevant functional endpoint(s) in studies.
  • Provide strong mechanistic evidence for the role of galactitol as the major mediator in the pathogenesis of the neurobehavioral symptoms of CG for accelerated approval consideration.
  • Adequately and comprehensively address evidence from published literature regarding plausible alternative toxic metabolites/pathophysiologic mechanisms of disease.
  • Determine and provide evidence to support a galactitol reduction response threshold that would be reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit.
  • For accelerated approval, provide substantial evidence of effectiveness of govorestat on the reasonably likely surrogate endpoint (RLSE) based on adequate and well-controlled clinical investigation(s) and confirmatory evidence, if a single trial is primary evidence.

Deficiency summary

The application lacks substantial evidence of effectiveness for govorestat for the treatment of CG, primarily due to the failure of the pivotal clinical trial to meet statistical significance and significant data quality issues. Additionally, the evidence provided is insufficient to support plasma galactitol as a reasonably likely surrogate endpoint for accelerated approval, with nonclinical studies exhibiting technical limitations and design flaws. Procedural requirements for proprietary name resubmission and a safety update are also noted.

Findings

Lack of Substantial Evidence of Effectiveness from Clinical Trial

Severity: major

Trial AT-007-1002 failed to achieve the prespecified criterion for statistical significance on global testing of primary endpoints and further analyses did not demonstrate convincing evidence of treatment effect. Significant data quality issues were also identified, precluding reliable assessment.

Recommended response: Conduct at least one new adequate and well-controlled trial demonstrating an effect of govorestat on clinically meaningful endpoint(s) in subjects with CG.

Inadequate Confirmatory Evidence and Issues with Reasonably Likely Surrogate Endpoint (RLSE)

Severity: major

The effect of govorestat on plasma galactitol and its correlation with clinical outcomes is inadequate as confirmatory evidence. There is limited evidence for galactitol being a major pathogenic driver of CG, with other metabolites and pathways potentially contributing. Nonclinical studies had significant technical limitations and design flaws, failing to show a robust, consistent, and sustained effect of galactitol changes on neurobehavioral outcomes. Correlation analyses showed weak and inconsistent associations, and the magnitude of galactitol reduction that would predict clinical benefit is unclear.

Recommended response: Provide strong mechanistic evidence for galactitol's role as the major mediator, address alternative toxic metabolites/pathophysiologic mechanisms, and determine/provide evidence for a galactitol reduction response threshold. Consider conducting a well-designed and adequately powered nonclinical efficacy study.

Proprietary Name Resubmission Required

Severity: minor

The proposed proprietary name was found conditionally acceptable but must be resubmitted when all application deficiencies have been resolved.

Recommended response: Resubmit the proposed proprietary name when responding to all identified deficiencies.

Safety Update Required

Severity: minor

A safety update, as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), must be included with the response to the deficiencies, incorporating new safety data from all nonclinical and clinical studies/trials.

Recommended response: Include a comprehensive safety update with the resubmission, detailing any significant changes or findings in the safety profile and presenting new safety data.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
NDA

Impact

Impact score
0.75
Estimated delay
365 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The primary theme is the lack of robust evidence for both direct clinical efficacy and the validity of a proposed surrogate endpoint (plasma galactitol) for accelerated approval, necessitating new clinical and nonclinical studies. This indicates a fundamental issue with the efficacy data package.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 25%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…