Assyro AI
US FDAUnited StatesCRLComplete Response Letter

Complete Response Letter NDA 505b1 219357 (Dec 23, 2024)

Issued December 23, 2024

Issued

December 23, 2024

Application

NDA 505b1 • 219357

Review center

CDER

Stage

Final Decision

Letter type

Complete Response Letter

Response due December 23, 2025Requires resubmission addressing deficiencies.

Summary

This FDA letter addresses deficiencies in New Drug Application (NDA) 219357, providing instructions for the applicant to resubmit the application. Key areas of focus include labeling, proprietary name, and a comprehensive safety update, along with general resubmission requirements and timelines.

Key points

  • Review labeling review resources, including regulations, guidance documents, and the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI).
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name after addressing all application deficiencies.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b) when responding to deficiencies.
  • The safety update must include data from all nonclinical and clinical studies/trials of the drug under consideration, regardless of indication, dosage form, or dose level.
  • Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile.
  • Incorporate new safety data into sections describing discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, and common adverse events.
  • Present new safety data from studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication using the same format as in the original submission.
  • Present tabulations of the new safety data combined with the original application data.

Cited reasons

  • Proprietary Name Resubmission Required
  • Comprehensive Safety Update Required
  • Insufficient Clinical Safety Data Presentation
  • Missing Worldwide Safety Experience Summary
  • Missing English Translations of Foreign Labeling
  • Labeling Comments Reserved
  • The application received a Complete Response due to significant deficiencies in the safety update, including inadequate presentation of clinical safety data, missing worldwide safety experience, and lack of English translations for foreign labeling. Labeling comments are reserved pending resolution of these issues.

Recommended actions

  • Review labeling review resources, including regulations, guidance documents, and the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI).
  • Resubmit the proposed proprietary name after addressing all application deficiencies.
  • Include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b) when responding to deficiencies.
  • The safety update must include data from all nonclinical and clinical studies/trials of the drug under consideration, regardless of indication, dosage form, or dose level.
  • Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile.
  • Incorporate new safety data into sections describing discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, and common adverse events.
  • Present new safety data from studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication using the same format as in the original submission.
  • Present tabulations of the new safety data combined with the original application data.

Deficiency summary

The application received a Complete Response due to significant deficiencies in the safety update, including inadequate presentation of clinical safety data, missing worldwide safety experience, and lack of English translations for foreign labeling. Labeling comments are reserved pending resolution of these issues.

Findings

Proprietary Name Resubmission Required

Severity: minor

The proposed proprietary name was found conditionally acceptable but requires resubmission when all application deficiencies are addressed.

Recommended response: Resubmit the proprietary name application concurrently with the complete response to all other deficiencies.

Comprehensive Safety Update Required

Severity: major

A comprehensive safety update, as described in 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), is required. This includes data from all nonclinical and clinical studies/trials regardless of indication, dosage form, or dose level.

Recommended response: Compile and submit a complete safety update covering all required aspects as per regulatory guidelines.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)

Insufficient Clinical Safety Data Presentation

Severity: major

Deficiencies in presenting clinical safety data include: describing significant changes in safety profile; incorporating new safety data into discontinuations, SAEs, and common AEs sections; presenting new safety data in the same format as original submission; tabulating new data combined with original data; comparing frequencies of AEs; providing separate tables for AEs in clinical trials for other indications; retabulating reasons for premature trial discontinuation; describing new trends; providing case report forms and narrative summaries for deaths/discontinuations due to AEs and for serious AEs; describing changes in common, less serious AEs; and providing updated exposure information.

Recommended response: Thoroughly review and re-present all clinical safety data, ensuring all specified elements are addressed, formatted correctly, and include comprehensive narratives and forms.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)

Missing Worldwide Safety Experience Summary

Severity: major

A summary of worldwide experience on the safety of this drug, including an updated estimate of use for drug marketed in other countries, is required.

Recommended response: Gather and compile all available worldwide safety data and usage estimates, presenting them in a comprehensive summary.

Cited: 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b)

Missing English Translations of Foreign Labeling

Severity: minor

English translations of current approved foreign labeling not previously submitted are required.

Recommended response: Obtain and submit certified English translations for all relevant foreign labeling.

Labeling Comments Reserved

Severity: info

Comments on the proposed Prescribing Information and Carton and Container Labeling are reserved until the application is otherwise adequate.

Recommended response: Address all other deficiencies first, then prepare for potential future labeling comments based on the updated application.

Regulatory context

Submission stage
final decision
Regulatory pathway
NDA

Impact

Impact score
0.75
Estimated delay
365 days
Estimated rework cost
$0
Subsequent action
resubmission

Strategic insights

The primary themes are insufficient clinical safety data and documentation, requiring a comprehensive safety update and proper presentation of global safety information before approval can be considered.

Regulatory change impact: Pending sponsor mitigation plan

Approval likelihood after response: 25%

Document viewer

Read the FDA letter and send context to the co-pilot at any time.

Loading document viewer…